Quantcast
Channel: Clean Up City of St. Augustine, Florida
Viewing all 6438 articles
Browse latest View live

LAND SCAM LATEST: Florida Ethics Commission to investigate St. Augustine City officials over 91-93 Coquina Avenue

$
0
0


Florida Ethics Commission complaints have been filed against at least three officials responsible for the City of St. Augustine Commission voting to spend $469,000 to buy 91-93 Coquina Avenue.  The deal was inaccurately presented as necessary for flood control when all that was needed is a one week construction easement.   

The location is ver near the twice-flooded Davis Shores homes of the City Manager JOHN PAtRICK REGAN, P.E. and two City Commissioners.  

One whom, family law attorney and Vice Mayor LEANNA SPHIA AMARU FEEMAN, promiscuously promoted the deal on Facebook, stating that it would increase property values. 

The Florida Ethics Commission will determine the sufficiency of the complaints and hold probable cause hearings, with advocates for prosecution appointed by the Florida Attorney General. 

If probable cause is found, FEC would then send the cases to open public hearings before an independent Administrative Law Judge.   

Conflict of interest and other unethical conduct are among the issues in the sworn complaints.



LEANNA SOPHIA AMARU FREEMAN
(HCN)






EVIDENTLY, CONMAN JERRY CAMERON HAS NINE LIVES, LIKE A CAT: Flagler Commission Picks Jerry Cameron, Retired from St. Johns Government After Eclectic Career, Its Interim (FLAGLERLIVE)

$
0
0
Political chameleon JERRY THOMAS CAMERON RIDES AGAIN!





Flagler Commission Picks Jerry Cameron, Retired from St. Johns Government After Eclectic Career, Its Interim

 | FEBRUARY 18, 2019
Jerry Cameron at the end of one of his interviews with a county commissioner this morning. Hours later, the commission voted to select him interim manager. (c FlaglerLive)
Jerry Cameron at the end of one of his interviews with a county commissioner this morning. Hours later, the commission voted to select him interim manager. (c FlaglerLive)
Flagler County commissioners took little time in a special meeting this afternoon to select Jerry Cameron their interim administrator for the next half year or more. The vote was unanimous. Cameron replaces Craig Coffey, whom the commission forced to resign last month, and is expected to restore some semblance of leadership in an administration adrift for weeks.

Cameron, 73, is a retired community consultant whose eclectic career took him from police chief (in Irmo, S.C. and Fernandina Beach) to city manager to college faculty member and St. Johns County’s assistant county administrator for community services from 2006 to 2015, a job he left because he was in a state retirement program that required him to stop working in government for a period. He also has extensive private sector experience in construction, home-building, running a water-sports resort in the Caribbean, a Marina in St. Augustine and a Honda motorcycle shop.
Today’s was his “first job interview in over 30 years,” Cameron said. “Usually, “people seek me out, saying, ‘would you come do this.'”
Cameron was one of just two candidates left on a shortlist that last week had stood at four, from 16 applicants. But Glenn Irby, formerly the Apopka city manager, withdrew last week, saying he’d taken another job, and Mike Esposito, a special projects director for Flagler County, told commissioners late Sunday night in an email that he was withdrawing. Esposito said he would be focusing on his current job for now, and may apply for the permanent position. The fourth candidate who did make it through interviews today was Ted Lakey, 61, who’d been administrator in Jackson and Taylor counties.
The lunch interview set-up with the two candidates this afternoon, with all the county's directors facing Cameron and Lakey. (c FlaglerLive)
The lunch interview set-up with the two candidates this afternoon, with all the county’s directors facing Cameron and Lakey. (c FlaglerLive)
The five county commissioners each individually interviewed the two candidates in 45-minute sessions this morning. The sessions were open to the public and press, though only Commissioner Joe Mullins drew a small audience–Lynne Rosewater of the Hammock, and Flagler Chamber President Jorge Gutierrez.
The candidates then sat through a lunch-interview, with about three dozen people interviewing them simultaneously: The commissioners and the county’s directors and top staff. The two candidates side sat by side facing six rows of tables filled with directors and staffers facing them, with four of the five commissioners and the county attorney sitting in the first row. (Don O’Brien, the commission chairman, introduced the proceedings then sat at the last table, ceding the grounds for the staff to ask questions. There was not a single member of the public present, and only one reporter, though the meeting was publicly posted.)
Both Cameron and Lakey have understated, unassuming personalities, their demeanor calm and workmanlike, their humor, if at all audible, only a distant echo to their prosaic immersion in the sausage-making of government management. As they sat next to each other and addressed county directors and commissioners during lunch, a prime opportunity for each to try to one-up the other, neither did so, neither seemed inclined to want to do so, and neither seemed to have an interest in showing off, or showing up his competitor. They were clearly a bit stiff from the uncomfortable set-up, but neither seemed to need to be overly cautious in answering questions, fielding the questions comfortably, though answering them more generally than not.
In sum, they came across as sharp contrasts with Coffey, whose outsized personality sometimes became so sizable as to trip him. And neither gave the sense of being a micromanager, as Coffey tended to be with some departments (but not others).
Cameron said there are those who love him and those who hate him. “The ones that are part of the solution always love me, that’s kind of my style,” Cameron said. Department heads who have matters under control may not see him for two weeks, he said, suggesting that he’s not big on micromanaging.
“I’m on the same page with him, I’m not a micromanager,” Lakey said, describing himself as fair and straight-forward. He described himself as “an honest person, a fair person, someone you can always get a good answer from.”
As commissioners discussed whom to hire, it quickly became clear that Cameron was their choice, but Commissioner Charlie Ericksen, who was also leaning toward Cameron, proposed also hiring Lakey as the deputy county administrator.

Lakey with Commissioner Dave Sullivan during their one-on-one interview. (c FlaglerLive)
“If that’s doable, I would love that, but I’m not sure that’s doable,” Commissioner Greg Hansen said: the deputy position is an exclusively administrative position that’s under the purview of the administrator, not the commission.
“I would be in favor of Mr. Cameron,” O’Brien said. “Mr. Cameron has a little extra checking off the boxes with respect to experience in a coastal county and a larger county with a more complicated set of operations, so that’s the direction I’m coming down. It would be interesting to be able to hire both, but I was going to bring this up probably at our meeting this evening, but I think we ought to consider looking for a project manager, if you will,” for the sheriff’s operations center: he wants the commission’s next focus on hiring that individual.
Lakey and Cameron both sat in the room, at the Emergency Operations Center, as the commission discussed their fate before voting in a meeting that began at 3 p.m. this afternoon.
As a faculty member at the University of Florida’s Institute of Police Technology and Management, Cameron taught budgeting, management, body language, roadside interviewing, interrogating and ethics–subjects that, speaking with a reporter, he said might make some of his directors nervous.
Not that the county’s director needed priming to be nervous.
Matt Dunn, the county’s tourism director and one of its directors more anxious about his future locally–he was closely associated with Coffey’s administration–asked the two candidates what their experiences were, working for tourist development councils. They both answered flatteringly. “TDC did a good job in helping us with funding for beach restoration” and other developments that helped St. Augustine list it as a leading tourist destination, he said.
Cameron did not say what he told Mullins during his one-on-one interview a short time before. “TDC is a mess,” Mullins told Cameron. “That’s par for the course,” Cameron responded. Mullins’s perception is at the root of Dunn’s anxiety.
Roy Seiger, the county’s airport director, asked the pair about their longer-term plans in Flagler: would they apply for the permanent position?
“You want to take this first?” Cameron asked Lakey.
Cameron in his interview with Commissioner Joe Mullins, with Lynne Rosewater, left, and Chamber President Jorge Gutierrez. (c FlaglerLive)
Cameron in his interview with Commissioner Joe Mullins, with Lynne Rosewater, left, and Chamber President Jorge Gutierrez. (c FlaglerLive)
A president once said I guess it’s what your definition is,” Cameron then said, referring to Bill Clinton’s famous paraphrase on the verb “is.” Cameron did not give a precise time, but said he is taking the job with the understanding that his time is limited, and that he will help make the transition for the next, more permanent manager. In one-on-one interview, he had been more precise, placing a three-year limit on his tenure in Flagler, thus suggesting that he would be all in to take the permanent job. Of course, Flagler Beach held on to its interim manager, Bernie Murphy, for four years until his exit in late 2010.
Then there was this from Adam Mengle, the county’s planning director: “Are you a leader or a manager, what’s the difference, and which one do you think we’re looking for here.”
Mengle did not get clear answers. “A leader,” Cameron said, “is someone you want to follow.” There is a management component to leadership, he said, such as bringing people with different agendas together. The most important resource, he said, is an organization’s people. “Leadership is exactly that, it’s developing people that want to follow you.” He did not say which he thought Flagler’s directors are looking for–a manager or a leader.
Lakey said “you have to be both,” and pretty much left it at that.
Holly Albanese, the county’s library director, asked how the two candidates saw the role of a public library: of course, both candidates spoke highly of public libraries. But then Albanese raised the question of the homeless camp pitched in the woods behind the library, and what the candidates would do about its consequences.
Lakey asked whether social agencies or programs locally could work with the county to help. But he didn’t have much else to offer. “What we don’t have here is a homeless shelter,” Albanese clarified.
“The homeless issue is an enigma,” Cameron said. “Unfortunately you are limited in the way of legislation on what you can do with those,” he continued, with other complications adding to the challenge when it comes to housing. With camps, “the only solution we really found that relieved the pressure was two-fold. We filtered the computers, so that cut down on the demand for computers, and we hired a security guard. That made things a lot more pleasant for people that worked at the library.” (The county library computers are filtered.)
Commissioners didn’t rehash their own one-on-one interviews when they took up their agenda at 3 p.m. They complimented both applicants, discussed the position of deputy, opened the floor to public participation–there was none–then took the vote.
Cameron and Lakey, who’d sat next to each other during the proceedings, shook hands, then Cameron–who wore a Paul Harris pin on his lapel, signifying he was in the Rotary Club’s Paul Harris Club two times over) had a conversation at the first station of his next months’ calvary: the county attorney and the human resources director.
On his way home 30 miles to the north, he was likely to listen to the book on his phone currently: the original Epic of Gilgamesh. (He described himself as a voracious reader. The print book on his nightstand currently is Alex Epstein’s “The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels.”)
The special meeting was over in 14 minutes.
Cameron, left, and Lakey. (c FlaglerLive)
Cameron, left, and Lakey. (c FlaglerLive)
Print Friendly, PDF & Email


6 Responses for “Flagler Commission Picks Jerry Cameron, Retired from St. Johns Government After Eclectic Career, Its Interim”

  1. Concerned Citizen says:
    All of this over an Interim position?
    Why is the County wasting time and money hiring an Interim manager? We have multiple projects going on that need over sight. We also have damage from Coffey Gate that needs fixing.
    The BOCC clearly shows now that it lacks the capability of making decisions on it.s own. It let Coffey lead it by the nose for years and now look where we are.
    I thought Florida also had a mandatory retirement age? I guess when you hire illegally double dipping Admin Assistants you aren’t really worried about laws.
    In regards to the homeless situation I’m a bit confused.
    If those people are living there illegally and are using drugs why not have them removed? They are trespassing and squatting along with using illegal narcotics. Why are you afraid of dong your job and enforcing the law?
    I understand that there needs to be a place for them to go however behind a County facility used by children is not the place for it. I have several friends who have stopped letting their kids go to the library alone. Kind of sad really that you can’t use a public facility because of safety concerns.
    I maintain commercial properties that have been affected by homeless people and can attest to the mess they make and the disrespect they show. These business owners have to call us in to clean up (which costs money) or face fines by unsympathetic code enforcement. And these are not big businesses with a lot of overhead so how is that fair?
    We find the same mess time after time. Discarded trash, human waste and drug paraphernalia. It’s disgusting an unsafe when you have to deal with it.
    With all the money you waste on other projects you could open several decent sized shelters. Clean out that camp and enforce laws for once.
  2. Concerned Citizen says:
    Concerned Citizen i agree with you on everything you said !!! I have a problem myself there is a sine and Pine Lakes parkway North the is broken from the first hurricane on 2016 i call the city numerous times they tolde me the city don’t have the money i also went to city offices same thing no money i stop by the sine and took pictures it’s the lightbulb that is broken .can someone tel me what to do. for the city to came on fix this problem meanwhile i see brand new sines going all over the city THANK YOU !!!!!!
  3. ConstantlyAmazed says:
    I read an article in the Palm Coast Observer yesterday which reported that Commissioner O’Brien was bit by a dog while walking through the camp.
  4. Percy's mother says:
    Re the comments/questions put forth by Holly Albanese about the homeless camp in the woods adjacent to the public library . . .
    Does Ms. Albanese want the homeless gone?
    or, when she mentioned there isn’t a homeless shelter here, was she alluding to needing to create a homeless shelter in Palm Coast?
  5. Trailer Bob says:
    Concerned Citizen, you nailed it. In Palm Coast, if you have a sign on your work truck, you cannot even park it in your driveway, but the homeless can choose to live where they wish, regardless of who owns the property? Please explain that logic for us…
  6. Fiscal says:
    This candidate is too old and has no education.
    Good luck with that!
    Isnt he also receiving a pension and now wants another steep salary?
    Nice

LEAVE A REPLY

 
 
More stories on FlaglerLive

Read Michael Cohen’s full prepared testimony on Trump’s Russia plans, WikiLeaks email dump. (PBS News Hour)

$
0
0







Read Michael Cohen’s full prepared testimony on Trump’s Russia plans, WikiLeaks email dump

 
“How’s it going in Russia?”
That was Donald Trump’s question, asked “at least a half dozen times” of his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, while on the campaign trail in 2016, according to prepared testimony Cohen plans to deliver to a House committee today. The president’s oft-repeated question referred to negotiations over a Moscow Tower project that Cohen said continued during the 2016 campaign.
In his remarks, Cohen also calls Trump “racist” and a “conman,” and says that he played a role in helping Trump cover up details ranging from the president’s Vietnam deferments and SAT scores to his extramarital affair with an adult actress.
House committee members will likely be most interested in Cohen’s claims that Trump was aware that Roger Stone, an adviser to the campaign, was in touch with WikiLeaks in an effort to obtain hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.
Cohen also said he does not know of any “direct evidence” that Trump or his campaign had colluded with Russia.
“But, I have my suspicions,” he said in his statement.
Read Cohen’s full testimony below:
###
TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL D. COHEN COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FEBRUARY 27, 2019
Chairman Cummings, Ranking Member Jordan, and Members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me here today.
I have asked this Committee to ensure that my family be protected from Presidential threats, and that the Committee be sensitive to the questions pertaining to ongoing investigations. Thank you for your help and for your understanding.
I am here under oath to correct the record, to answer the Committee’s questions truthfully, and to offer the American people what I know about President Trump.
I recognize that some of you may doubt and attack me on my credibility. It is for this reason that I have incorporated into this opening statement documents that are irrefutable, and demonstrate that the information you will hear is accurate and truthful.
Never in a million years did I imagine, when I accepted a job in 2007 to work for Donald Trump, that he would one day run for President, launch a campaign on a platform of hate and intolerance, and actually win. I regret the day I said “yes” to Mr. Trump. I regret all the help and support I gave him along the way.
I am ashamed of my own failings, and I publicly accepted responsibility for them by pleading guilty in the Southern District of New York.
I am ashamed of my weakness and misplaced loyalty – of the things I did for Mr. Trump in an effort to protect and promote him.
I am ashamed that I chose to take part in concealing Mr. Trump’s illicit acts rather than listening to my own conscience.
I am ashamed because I know what Mr. Trump is.
He is a racist.
He is a conman.
He is a cheat.
He was a presidential candidate who knew that Roger Stone was talking with Julian Assange about a WikiLeaks drop of Democratic National Committee emails.
I will explain each in a few moments.
I am providing the Committee today with several documents. These include:
  • A copy of a check Mr. Trump wrote from his personal bank account – after he became president – to reimburse me for the hush money payments I made to cover up his affair with an adult film star and prevent damage to his campaign;
  • Copies of financial statements for 2011 – 2013 that he gave to such institutions as Deutsche Bank;
  • A copy of an article with Mr. Trump’s handwriting on it that reported on the auction of a portrait of himself – he arranged for the bidder ahead of time and then reimbursed the bidder from the account of his non-profit charitable foundation, with the picture now hanging in one of his country clubs; and
  • Copies of letters I wrote at Mr. Trump’s direction that threatened his high school, colleges, and the College Board not to release his grades or SAT scores.
I hope my appearance here today, my guilty plea, and my work with law enforcement agencies are steps along a path of redemption that will restore faith in me and help this country understand our president better.
Before going further, I want to apologize to each of you and to Congress as a whole.
The last time I appeared before Congress, I came to protect Mr. Trump.
Today, I’m here to tell the truth about Mr. Trump.
I lied to Congress about when Mr. Trump stopped negotiating the Moscow Tower project in Russia. I stated that we stopped negotiating in January 2016. That was false – our negotiations continued for months later during the campaign.
Mr. Trump did not directly tell me to lie to Congress. That’s not how he operates.
In conversations we had during the campaign, at the same time I was actively negotiating in Russia for him, he would look me in the eye and tell me there’s no business in Russia and then go out and lie to the American people by saying the same thing. In his way, he was telling me to lie.
There were at least a half-dozen times between the Iowa Caucus in January 2016 and the end of June when he would ask me “How’s it going in Russia?” – referring to the Moscow Tower project.
You need to know that Mr. Trump’s personal lawyers reviewed and edited my statement to Congress about the timing of the Moscow Tower negotiations before I gave it.
To be clear: Mr. Trump knew of and directed the Trump Moscow negotiations throughout the campaign and lied about it. He lied about it because he never expected to win the election. He also lied about it because he stood to make hundreds of millions of dollars on the Moscow real estate project.
And so I lied about it, too – because Mr. Trump had made clear to me, through his personal statements to me that we both knew were false and through his lies to the country, that he wanted me to lie. And he made it clear to me because his personal attorneys reviewed my statement before I gave it to Congress.
Over the past two years, I have been smeared as “a rat” by the President of the United States. The truth is much different, and let me take a brief moment to introduce myself.
My name is Michael Dean Cohen.
I am a blessed husband of 24 years and a father to an incredible daughter and son. When I married my wife, I promised her that I would love her, cherish her, and protect her. As my father said countless times throughout my childhood, “you my wife, and you my children, are the air that I breathe.”
To my Laura, my Sami, and my Jake, there is nothing I wouldn’t do to protect you.
I have always tried to live a life of loyalty, friendship, generosity, and compassion – qualities my parents ingrained in my siblings and me since childhood. My father survived the Holocaust thanks to the compassion and selfless acts of others. He was helped by many who put themselves in harm’s way to do what they knew was right. 
That is why my first instinct has always been to help those in need. Mom and Dad … I am sorry that I let you down. As many people that know me best would say, I am the person they would call at 3 a.m. if they needed help. I proudly remember being the emergency contact for many of my children’s friends when they were growing up because their parents knew that I would drop everything and care for them as if they were my own.
Yet, last fall I pled guilty in federal court to felonies for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in coordination with Individual #1.
For the record: Individual #1 is President Donald J. Trump.
It is painful to admit that I was motivated by ambition at times. It is even more painful to admit that many times I ignored my conscience and acted loyal to a man when I should not have. Sitting here today, it seems unbelievable that I was so mesmerized by Donald Trump that I was willing to do things for him that I knew were absolutely wrong.
For that reason, I have come here to apologize to my family, to the government, and to the American people.
Accordingly, let me now tell you about Mr. Trump.
I got to know him very well, working very closely with him for more than 10 years, as his Executive Vice President and Special Counsel and then personal attorney when he became President. When I first met Mr. Trump, he was a successful entrepreneur, a real estate giant, and an icon. Being around Mr. Trump was intoxicating. When you were in his presence, you felt like you were involved in something greater than yourself — that you were somehow changing the world.
I wound up touting the Trump narrative for over a decade. That was my job. Always stay on message. Always defend. It monopolized my life. At first, I worked mostly on real estate developments and other business transactions. 
Shortly thereafter, Mr. Trump brought me into his personal life and private dealings. Over time, I saw his true character revealed.
Mr. Trump is an enigma. He is complicated, as am I. He has both good and bad, as do we all. But the bad far outweighs the good, and since taking office, he has become the worst version of himself. He is capable of behaving kindly, but he is not kind. He is capable of committing acts of generosity, but he is not generous. He is capable of being loyal, but he is fundamentally disloyal.
Donald Trump is a man who ran for office to make his brand great, not to make our country great. He had no desire or intention to lead this nation – only to market himself and to build his wealth and power. Mr. Trump would often say, this campaign was going to be the “greatest infomercial in political history.”
He never expected to win the primary. He never expected to win the general election. The campaign – for him – was always a marketing opportunity.
I knew early on in my work for Mr. Trump that he would direct me to lie to further his business interests. I am ashamed to say, that when it was for a real estate mogul in the private sector, I considered it trivial. As the President, I consider it significant and dangerous.
But in the mix, lying for Mr. Trump was normalized, and no one around him questioned it. In fairness, no one around him today questions it, either.
A lot of people have asked me about whether Mr. Trump knew about the release of the hacked Democratic National Committee emails ahead of time. The answer is yes.
As I earlier stated, Mr. Trump knew from Roger Stone in advance about the WikiLeaks drop of emails.
In July 2016, days before the Democratic convention, I was in Mr. Trump’s office when his secretary announced that Roger Stone was on the phone. Mr. Trump put Mr. Stone on the speakerphone. Mr. Stone told Mr. Trump that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and that Mr. Assange told Mr. Stone that, within a couple of days, there would be a massive dump of emails that would damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
Mr. Trump responded by stating to the effect of “wouldn’t that be great.”
Mr. Trump is a racist. The country has seen Mr. Trump court white supremacists and bigots. You have heard him call poorer countries “shitholes.”
In private, he is even worse.
He once asked me if I could name a country run by a black person that wasn’t a “shithole.” This was when Barack Obama was President of the United States. 
While we were once driving through a struggling neighborhood in Chicago, he commented that only black people could live that way. And, he told me that black people would never vote for him because they were too stupid.
And yet I continued to work for him.
Mr. Trump is a cheat.
As previously stated, I’m giving the Committee today three years of President Trump’s financial statements, from 2011-2013, which he gave to Deutsche Bank to inquire about a loan to buy the Buffalo Bills and to Forbes. These are Exhibits 1a, 1b, and 1c to my testimony.
It was my experience that Mr. Trump inflated his total assets when it served his purposes, such as trying to be listed among the wealthiest people in Forbes, and deflated his assets to reduce his real estate taxes.
I am sharing with you two newspaper articles, side by side, that are examples of Mr. Trump inflating and deflating his assets, as I said, to suit his financial interests. These are Exhibit 2 to my testimony.
As I noted, I’m giving the Committee today an article he wrote on, and sent me, that reported on an auction of a portrait of Mr. Trump. This is Exhibit 3A to my testimony.
Mr. Trump directed me to find a straw bidder to purchase a portrait of him that was being auctioned at an Art Hamptons Event. The objective was to ensure that his portrait, which was going to be auctioned last, would go for the highest price of any portrait that afternoon. The portrait was purchased by the fake bidder for $60,000. Mr. Trump directed the Trump Foundation, which is supposed to be a charitable organization, to repay the fake bidder, despite keeping the art for himself. Please see Exhibit 3B to my testimony.
And it should come as no surprise that one of my more common responsibilities was that Mr. Trump directed me to call business owners, many of whom were small businesses, that were owed money for their services and told them no payment or a reduced payment would be coming. When I advised Mr. Trump of my success, he actually reveled in it.
And yet, I continued to work for him. 
Mr. Trump is a conman.
He asked me to pay off an adult film star with whom he had an affair, and to lie to his wife about it, which I did. 
Lying to the First Lady is one of my biggest regrets. She is a kind, good person. I respect her greatly – and she
did not deserve that.
I am giving the Committee today a copy of the $130,000 wire transfer from me to Ms. Clifford’s attorney during the closing days of the presidential campaign that was demanded by Ms. Clifford to maintain her silence about her affair with Mr. Trump. This is Exhibit 4 to my testimony.
Mr. Trump directed me to use my own personal funds from a Home Equity Line of Credit to avoid any money being traced back to him that could negatively impact his campaign. I did that, too – without bothering to consider whether that was improper, much less whether it was the right thing to do or how it would impact me, my family, or the public.
I am going to jail in part because of my decision to help Mr. Trump hide that payment from the American people before they voted a few days later.
As Exhibit 5 to my testimony shows, I am providing a copy of a $35,000
check that President Trump personally signed from his personal bank account on August 1, 2017 – when he was President of the United States – pursuant to the cover-up, which was the basis of my guilty plea, to reimburse me – the word used by Mr. Trump’s TV lawyer — for the illegal hush money I paid on his behalf. This $35,000 check was one of 11 check installments that was paid throughout the year – while he was President.
The President of the United States thus wrote a personal check for the payment of hush money as part of a criminal scheme to violate campaign finance laws. You can find the details of that scheme, directed by Mr. Trump, in the pleadings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
So picture this scene – in February 2017, one month into his presidency, I’m visiting President Trump in the Oval Office for the first time. It’s truly awe-inspiring, he’s showing me around and pointing to different paintings, and he says to me something to the effect of … Don’t worry, Michael, your January and February reimbursement checks are coming. They were FedExed from New York and it takes a while for that to get through the White House system. As he promised, I received the first check for the reimbursement of $70,000 not long thereafter.
When I say conman, I’m talking about a man who declares himself brilliant but directed me to threaten his high school, his colleges, and the College Board to never release his grades or SAT scores.
As I mentioned, I’m giving the Committee today copies of a letter I sent at Mr. Trump’s direction threatening these schools with civil and criminal actions if Mr. Trump’s grades or SAT scores were ever disclosed without his permission. These are Exhibit 6.
The irony wasn’t lost on me at the time that Mr. Trump in 2011 had strongly criticized President Obama for not releasing his grades. As you can see in Exhibit 7, Mr. Trump declared “Let him show his records” after calling President Obama “a terrible student.”
The sad fact is that I never heard Mr. Trump say anything in private that led me to believe he loved our nation or wanted to make it better. In fact, he did the opposite.
When telling me in 2008 that he was cutting employees’ salaries in half – including mine – he showed me what he claimed was a $10 million IRS tax refund, and he said that he could not believe how stupid the government was for giving “someone like him” that much money back.
During the campaign, Mr. Trump said he did not consider Vietnam Veteran, and Prisoner of War, Senator John McCain to be “a hero” because he likes people who weren’t captured. At the same time, Mr. Trump tasked me to handle the negative press surrounding his medical deferment from the Vietnam draft.
Mr. Trump claimed it was because of a bone spur, but when I asked for medical records, he gave me none and said there was no surgery. He told me not to answer the specific questions by reporters but rather offer simply the fact that he received a medical deferment.
He finished the conversation with the following comment. “You think I’m stupid, I wasn’t going to Vietnam.”
I find it ironic, President Trump, that you are in Vietnam right now.
And yet, I continued to work for him.
Questions have been raised about whether I know of direct evidence that Mr. Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia. I do not. I want to be clear. But, I have my suspicions.
Sometime in the summer of 2017, I read all over the media that there had been a meeting in Trump Tower in June 2016 involving Don Jr. and others from the campaign with Russians, including a representative of the Russian government, and an email setting up the meeting with the subject line, “Dirt on Hillary Clinton.” Something clicked in my mind. 
I remember being in the room with Mr. Trump, probably in early June 2016, when something peculiar happened. Don Jr. came into the room and walked behind his father’s desk – which in itself was unusual. People didn’t just walk behind Mr. Trump’s desk to talk to him. I recalled Don Jr. leaning over to his father and speaking in a low voice, which I could clearly hear, and saying: “The meeting is all set.” I remember Mr. Trump saying, “Ok good … let me know.”
What struck me as I looked back and thought about that exchange between Don Jr. and his father was, first, that Mr. Trump had frequently told me and others that his son Don Jr. had the worst judgment of anyone in the world. And also, that Don Jr. would never set up any meeting of any significance alone – and certainly not without checking with his father.
I also knew that nothing went on in Trump world, especially the campaign, without Mr. Trump’s knowledge and approval. So, I concluded that Don Jr. was referring to that June 2016 Trump Tower meeting about dirt on Hillary with the Russian representative when he walked behind his dad’s desk that day — and that Mr. Trump knew that was the meeting Don Jr. was talking about when he said, “That’s good … let me know.”
Over the past year or so, I have done some real soul searching. I see now that my ambition and the intoxication of Trump power had much to do with the bad decisions I made.
To you, Chairman Cummings, Ranking Member Jordan, the other members of this Committee, and the other members of the House and Senate, I am sorry for my lies and for lying to Congress.
To our nation, I am sorry for actively working to hide from you the truth about Mr. Trump when you needed it most. 
For those who question my motives for being here today, I understand. I have lied, but I am not a liar. I have done bad things, but I am not a bad man. I have fixed things, but I am no longer your “fixer,” Mr. Trump.
I am going to prison and have shattered the safety and security that I tried so hard to provide for my family. My testimony certainly does not diminish the pain I caused my family and friends – nothing can do that. And I have never asked for, nor would I accept, a pardon from President Trump.
And, by coming today, I have caused my family to be the target of personal, scurrilous attacks by the President and his lawyer – trying to intimidate me from appearing before this panel. Mr. Trump called me a “rat” for choosing to tell the truth – much like a mobster would do when one of his men decides to cooperate with the government.
As Exhibit 8 shows, I have provided the Committee with copies of Tweets that Mr. Trump posted, attacking me and my family – only someone burying his head in the sand would not recognize them for what they are: encouragement to someone to do harm to me and my family.
I never imagined that he would engage in vicious, false attacks on my family – and unleash his TV-lawyer to do the same. I hope this committee and all members of Congress on both sides of the aisle will make it clear:
As a nation, we should not tolerate attempts to intimidate witnesses before congress and attacks on family are out of bounds and not acceptable.
I wish to especially thank Speaker Pelosi for her statements in Exhibit 9 to protect this institution and me, and the Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Adam Schiff and Chairman Cummings for likewise defending this institution and my family against the attacks by Mr. Trump, and also the many Republicans who have admonished the President as well.
I am not a perfect man. I have done things I am not proud of, and I will live with the consequences of my actions for the rest of my life.
But today, I get to decide the example I set for my children and how I attempt to change how history will remember me. I may not be able to change the past, but I can do right by the American people here today.
Thank you for your attention. I am happy to answer the Committee’s questions.

What's next? Heroic Reform St. Augustine Mayor Nancy Shaver Resigns, After Stroke

$
0
0
Moments after the end of a contentious meeting -- one that she said came "close to character assassination" by unethical Vice Mayor LEANNA SOPHIA AMARU FREEMAN -- heroic St. Augustine Mayor Nancy Shaver suffered a stroke, resigning to recover from the stroke and a second bout of breast cancer.  

Our hearts are broken and we pray for Nancy Shaver's speedy recovery

Illegitimi non carborundum.  Venceremos. 

Here's what's next, from City PR machine:





March 1, 2019

Five FAQs regarding filling the vacancy of the office of mayor
What happens next?

With Nancy Shaver’s announcement on Thursday, February 28 that she resigned her office as St. Augustine Mayor, the clock started running for the remaining four members of the City Commission to select a replacement to complete that term of office. Following are some of the most asked questions about that process.

When will the new mayor be selected?
The City Charter gives the remaining commissioners 10 days to appoint a replacement, otherwise the Governor will fill the vacancy. The commission will initiate that process at a special meeting on Monday, March 4 at 9:00am in The Alcazar Room, City Hall, 75 King St. The meeting is open to the public and will be broadcast live on GTV/Comcast channel 3 and streamed live at www.CityStAugTV.com where it will be available for on-demand viewing the next day.

Who is qualified to be appointed to fill out the term?
There are no qualifications for the new mayor above those required for anyone who would have sought the office through a regular election, being anyone who is a qualified elector, i.e. a resident of the city and of voting age. 

Why doesn’t the vice mayor automatically fill the position?
The City Charter provides that the vice mayor, or another commissioner, may fill in for the mayor during temporary absences, but not automatically fill the office in the event of a permanent vacancy, such as in case of a resignation. 

When will the new mayor take office?
The new mayor takes office immediately after being selected by the commission’s majority vote and being sworn into office which must occur within the 10-day window allowed by the City Charter. The new mayor is selected to complete the current term of office which expires on December 7, 2020, the first Monday in December following the next regular election.

Does the mayor have powers not afforded other members of the commission?
Since St. Augustine has a city manager form of government, as opposed to a strong mayor form, the position of mayor is largely ceremonial with the city’s day-to-day operations being handled by the city manager. The position of mayor, in this form of government, carries no more authority that the other members of the commission, although the mayor does chair commission meetings and signs official documents on behalf of the commission. Also, the mayor is often the most visible member of the commission largely by virtue of being most often called upon to represent the city at formal events.
_______________________
CityStAug News
City of St. Augustine, FL  / Public Affairs Department
Phn: 904.825.1004 / P.O.Box 210 / St. Augustine, FL 32085-0210

Like Us:     www.Facebook.com/CityStAug
__________________________________________
Please Note: Florida has a very broad Public Records Law. 
Unless specifically exempt by state law, written communications 
to city officials or staff regarding official city business are public 
records available to the public and media upon request. If your 
email communication is related to official government business, 
it may therefore be subject to public disclosure.

Chris Strickland’s 2016 resignation came via sharp-worded texts to Shoar (SAR)

$
0
0



















We, the People of St. Johns County have "lost confidence" in thin-skinned Sheriff DAVID SHOAR, who legally changed his name from "HOAR" in 1994, was elected Sheriff in 2004 and we hope will be out the door in 2020.

It's time for him to go.


Chris Strickland’s 2016 resignation came via sharp-worded texts to Shoar 

By Jared Keever
St. Augustine Record
March 2-3, 2019





A long serving member of the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office now vying for the county’s top law enforcement post appears to have had an acrimonious break with the agency that he wants to lead.
That’s the picture painted in a nine-page document from the personnel file of Chris Strickland — a document that makes clear Strickland will be running without the endorsement of St. Johns County Sheriff David Shoar in the upcoming race for his office.
Strickland, who resigned from his post as director of the Office of the Sheriff in 2016, announced his candidacy for Sheriff in early January.
Shoar is expected to retire at the end of this, his fourth, term.
During a brief interview with The Record shortly after his announcement, Strickland said that while he chose to resign 27 years into his career, becoming Sheriff had always been a goal of his. He also said at the time that he counted Shoar as a friend, though he acknowledged “differences in philosophies” between them.
But the document, authored by Shoar and labeled a “memorandum for record” details a series of heated text messages that Strickland sent to Shoar in July 2016 that resulted in an abrupt resignation.
That memo, which was placed in Strickland’s file roughly four months after the resignation, also suggests that Shoar had lost confidence in Strickland’s effectiveness as a leader and it includes another text message, sent in October 2016, in which Strickland signaled his intent to run for office in 2020 and suggested that he still felt animosity toward Shoar.
“Don’t be mistaken, I will run for sheriff of this county in the next term because I’ve earned every crumb of it,” Strickland wrote to Shoar on Oct. 10, 2016. “I’ve earned it with every bit of my blood, sweat and tears. Again, you don’t need to respond to this. I will be there with or without your support, it means nothing to me who you support.”
That came just days after Hurricane Matthew and after Shoar had reached out to Strickland to make sure his family was prepared for the storm. The two, according to the messages included in the file, exchanged a few pleasant words before the mood again turned dark.
About three months earlier, on July 18, 2016, the two appear to have agreed to go their separate ways, with Strickland continuing to support Shoar, who at the time was running for re-election against Debra Maynard. They also agreed to say that Strickland had left simply to “pursue other interests.”
Text messages exchanged the night before though suggest that hard feelings would likely remain.
Those messages were exchanged after Strickland lashed out at the agency’s former undersheriff, Joel Bolante, after Bolante sent a one-line email to deputies wishing them well.
In that email Strickland said Bolante, who had retired more than a year earlier, “committed atrocities on the people of this sheriff’s office unparalleled to some of the most narcissistic leaders of our time.”
A subsequent exchange between Bolante and Strickland is also included in the document in which Bolante tells Strickland that the only “atrocity” he committed “was holding undeserving and incapable people such as yourself accountable.”
(In a brief phone interview on Friday, Bolante declined to talk at length about any tension between him and Strickland and offered only that he thought his own email “kind of speaks for itself” and that his job at the Sheriff’s Office was to “make sure people were doing their job and to hold those accountable who were not.”)
As the email exchange between Bolante and Strickland was taking place, Strickland also sent a copy of his initial email to Shoar via text message saying “if that cost me my job, just tell me.”
“I’m not going to apologize for what I said to him or how I feel about him,” he wrote. “It would be the same as pledging allegiance to ISIS.”
According to the document, that text was sent at 5:21 p.m. There is no response from Shoar listed.
Two hours later, Strickland sent Shoar another text attacking him for not responding.
“If you believe what Joel believes in, then f--- you and him,” he wrote. “Send Rick to come get my car and my equipment tomorrow and have Becky process my paperwork.”
More than two hours later, around 10 p.m., Shoar responded saying he had read the emails exchanged between Strickland and Bolante as well as the texts Strickland sent to him.
“Your resignation is accepted effective immediately,” Shoar wrote.
At midnight, Strickland responded, “F--- you.”
Two hours later, Strickland sent a lengthy text to Shoar apologizing for the previous message and that he knew he “can’t expect to talk to the sheriff like I did and keep a job.”
He pledged to continue to support Shoar through that year’s race for the Sheriff’s Office.
In Shoar’s memo, dated Dec. 1, 2016, he called Strickland’s first email to Bolante “outrageous and bizarre.”
Earlier in the memo, Shoar also takes issue with Strickland’s job performance as a newly appointed director and says that after Strickland missed a hurricane preparedness exercise earlier in that year he had made up his mind to demote him, though Strickland resigned before that happened.
Asked Thursday about the document in his personnel file, Strickland said he had not seen it, though he was not surprised to learn that it was there. He said a copy of it had been sent to him via certified mail but he did not pick it up because he “wasn’t interested in seeing it.”
Asked if he would like to be provided a copy so he could see if the portrayal of the exchanges was fair, he declined, and stood by anything he said.
“To be honest with you I put all that behind me,” he said. “And I can just give you a blanket statement: If it was said in there, and I said it, then it needed to be said. And that is about the best way I can describe what happened there.”
When read a synopsis of the conversation that led to his resignation, Strickland said he believed there were messages left out of the exchange (in a brief interview, Shoar said the exchange is complete), but reiterated that he stood by what he said to Shoar and said that he believes Bolante “is not a virtuous man.”
“For the record, I don’t any have regrets about what I said to him. He needed to hear it and he needed to hear it in the manner that he heard it,” he said of his conversation with Shoar.
He added later that it was important to note that all of it happened over text message “because David refused to call me and talk to me like a man.”
Strickland has put $25,000 of his own money behind his campaign and raised roughly $17,000 from others since announcing his intention to run. His financial report for the month of February has not been filed.
No other viable candidate has entered the race.

ABRUPT RESIGNATION: ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH CITY COMMISSIONER RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN Abdicates, Unexpectedly, Without Telling His Wife. Anyone wonder why?

$
0
0


Controversial St. Augustine Beach City Commissioner RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN abruptly resigned shortly before Commissioners adjourned for the evening of March 5, 2019, a day when the City's paid parking plan fizzled to an abrupt halt.




Sep 13, 2017 - In honor of StAugustine Beach Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN's possible illegal dumping contaminated pool water into storm sewer, with ...
Sep 20, 2018 - Lazy StAugustine Beach City Commissioner RICH O'BRIEN, a/k/a RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN, is the only Commissioner who refuses to ...
Mar 2, 2018 - SAB's ex-Mayor, controversial Commissioner RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN faces a proposed censure resolution at the March 5, 2018 St.
Jul 22, 2017 - Twice-fined lawbreaking recidivist reprobate StAugustine Beach Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN describes himself as the "man in a ...
Nov 1, 2016 - This is why controversial StAugustine Beach Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIENobtained an ex parte injunction and wants to silence ...
May 20, 2017 - In response, Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN told the Record: "I'M DONE." He's not running again. The Record and citizens should ask if Mr.
May 23, 2017 - Will controversial StAugustine Beach Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN be ordered to tear down one of two McMansions he's building on F ...
Jul 6, 2017 - StAugustine Beach Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN's four colleagues voted 3 -1 July 5th to fine him $25,000, require him to tear down part ...
Oct 24, 2018 - Commissioner and former StAugustine Beach Mayor RICHARD BURTT O' BRIENstill faces a probable cause hearing on ethics charges over ...

Jun 5, 2017 - Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN of StAugustine Beach has not responded to questions about his illegally encroaching 2.9 feet on a ...

Help Preserve and Protect Democracy and Our Quality of Life in St. Augustine, Florida

$
0
0
Check out the March 20, 2019 Folio Weekly Magazine cover story. Help support my independent investigative reporting and zealous public interest advocacy to preserve and protect Our Nation's Oldest City and environs, its history, nature, governmental integrity and the public fisc. Help me to continue to expose flummery, dupery, nincompoopery, waste, fraud, abuse, maladministration, misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance and no-bid contracts. Help us learn and speak the truth to power.
Why this matters: Since 2005, We, the People have won some 70+ public interest victories here in St. Augustine and St. Johns County, including ending City's illegal solid waste dumping, ending City's illegal sewage pollution and winning significant First Amendment and Gay rights victories. Help us continue. www.gofundme.com/edslavin




Flagler Beach Kills Paid Parking Proposal for the City: ‘We Don’t Have a Parking Problem’. (FlaglerLive.com)

$
0
0
Flagler Beach rejected this corporate con job, and so should St. Augustine Beach.

QUO VOBIS VIDETOR?

(WHAT DO Y'ALL RECKON?)



From FlaglerLive.com:



Flagler Beach Kills Paid Parking Proposal for the City: ‘We Don’t Have a Parking Problem’

 | MARCH 15, 2019
What parking problem? (© FlaglerLive)
What parking problem? (© FlaglerLive)
“The news tomorrow needs to be no paid parking in Flagler Beach,” City Commissioner Rick Belhumeur told his colleagues on the commission during Thursday evening’s meeting. 

So it is: the Flagler Beach City Commission killed any further attempt at a paid-parking scheme in the city, shelving a study that was proposing to create a cumbersome system of meter-maids, paid and monitored parking in the city’s core, and that would potentially generate $300,000 in revenue over three years. But the city would have seen hardly any of that money. Rather, the money would have paid whatever management company the city would have had to engage to run its parking system and its various complications. (See a fuller analysis of the study here.)
Three times Commissioner Eric Cooley Thursday evening asked for a clear consensus from his colleagues to pout the study and any further discussion of paid parking to rest. “I just wanted to clear the air of the parking thing and just say we all looked at the findings, we saw it’s not fiscally feasible, the juice isn’t worth the squeeze,” Cooley said. 
Commissioners agreed. “For now,” said Commissioner Marshall Shupe, a veteran of those discussions, which have a cicada-like regularity to them. “It’ll come back in five years.” 
“That’s five years of not hearing about it,” Cooley said. 
The city will pay more attention to signage, however, and to more clearly advertising its existing free parking lots (it has five of them). The parking report, however, seemed to commissioners out of sync with the city’s needs and realities. 
“I don’t think we have a parking problem, and certainly this isn’t going to repair any parking problem if we did. It’s going to create more,” Belhumeur said. 
“I don’t think that report that we got shows that we ought to do anything,” Mealy said of the Walker Consultants report, which was presented to commissioners in January. “I don’t see putting more money into more studies to make it work like some people want it to work. I think we’ll just say finally we don’t have a parking issue and we don’t do this.” 
“My take on that is similar but I wasn’t really looking at it as money-making,” Shupe said, “because I didn’t think we were going to get rich over it, that’s for sure. My take is, do we have a parking a parking problem, and if we do, where can we adapt our resources to improve that, if there is indeed a problem.” But he was opposed to following any of the report’s recommendations. “I’m not even 49 percent agreeable with that,” he said. “I think it was a shot in the dark to get as far as I’m concerned an authentic–if you will–study done by somebody with reputable background and that type of thing. I think it was a good report, but I don’t think it works for this city or the residents. A couple of times a year it’s a problem, but people have put up with that for 40 or 50 years and they’ll probably put up for that for another 40 or 50 if they have to wait an hour and a half to leave after a parade.” 
Commissioner Kim Carney said this isn’t the year to be experimenting with paid parking anyway, given the yearlong construction on A1A. She was critical of the report’s “snapshot in time” approach, which she said was not grounded in local realities, “and I surely didn’t expect somebody to come back and tell me I needed to hire an outside person to do this,” she said. She doesn’t think the city has a parking problem, either, “but I can tell you there were some recommendations from that parking committee like signage and GPS and getting our parking on the internet so people know where to go, that we do have to deal with, whether it’s going to be metered parking to raise money or not, that’s fine. But we still need to get into the next century so that when people come here they know there are other lots to go to.” 
Mayor Linda Provencher was proposing to incorporate such proposals in a coming goal-setting session. But City Manager Larry Newsom said as soon as he took the job in the city he added the addresses of the city’s parking lots on the city’s website, along with a map. He concedes that Flagler Beach isn’t Sign City, but recalled that “when I first got here signage was a taboo world, because I walked into a city that basically said that we don’t like signs. We want to limit signs.”
Earlier in the afternoon the commission held a separate meeting to swear-in Belhumeur and Mealy, who were both re-elected last week. The commission then selected its next chair, replacing Belhumeur. Belhumeur nominated Carney. Cooley nominated Shupe. Carney seconded her own nomination, Mealy seconded the nomination for Shupe. The city attorney then said each proposal would have to be voted on in turn, starting with Carney’s. 
Cooley was first up in the roll call. He paused a very long time, trying to decide whether he was for Carney or not. “Heck, I like either of them,” he said. As for Carney’s nomination: “I’m not opposed to it.” But he had nominated Shupe. He ended up saying yes to the Carney nomination, likely unaware that that would seal it for her: Belhumeur and Carney voted yes, too, while Shupe and Mealy voted no. There was another awkward moment when commissioners thought they’d get to vote again on the Shupe nomination. 
No, Drew Smith said, since Carney got the majority, that was the end of it. She was the new chair. 
Nominations for the largely ceremonial post are not usually that contentious, or weird. They are in this case because Shupe and Mealy have memories of Carney’s previous chairmanship, which unsettled the commission enough that one of its members attempted to boot her off the chair. The attempt failed at the end of a contentious meeting featuring a wave of public support for Carney. 
Shupe won the vice-chairmanship unanimously, lining him up for next year’s chairmanship.






"First They Came for the Artists -- Attorney Thomas Cushman defends constitutional rights of homeless in St. Augustine’s latest moral panic," by Ed Slavin & Georgio Valentino (Folio Weekly, March 20, 2019)

$
0
0
Honored to share a cover story byline with Folio Weekly Magazine Editor Georgio Valentino in this week's edition of Folio.  Venceremos!



FOLIO FEATURE

First They Came for the Artists

Attorney Thomas Cushman defends constitutional rights of homeless in St. Augustine’s latest moral panic

Posted 
Jennifer, a Stage-4 cancer patient, was sitting with her cat on a leash in the courtyard of St. Augustine’s Lightner Museum and City Hall. Then she got sick. When St. Augustine police arrived on the scene, without even performing a wellness check, officers seized her bottle of green tea, claiming it smelled like vodka. We’ll never know. They poured it out on the spot, thus destroying the “evidence,” and transported her to jail, where a Breathalyzer test revealed a blood-alcohol level of ... zero.
Jennifer remained incarcerated for 36 hours. Then she walked from the jail to attorney Thomas Cushman’s office. Jennifer refused to plead guilty, and a jury convicted her of violating the city’s open-container ordinance. An officer had testified that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement refuses to accept or process container bottles for alcohol and that officers are trained to pour out alleged alcohol evidence and not preserve it.
Assistant City Attorney John Cary—performing in front of his first jury—asked Judge Charles Tinlin to throw the book at Jennifer for her brazen refusal to cop a plea. The judge wisely refused, sentencing her to time served. No city records support any claim of FDLE refusal to test container contents in alcohol possession cases, or SAPD instructions to destroy evidence in open-container cases before trial, at the time of arrest.
Homelessness, vagrancy and panhandling are facets of an issue that is reaching moral-panic proportions in the Ancient City. SAPD’s response has been a mixed bag, sometimes overstepping its bounds and sometimes being accused by local hardliners of indulging the indigent population. Tom Cushman and other longtime residents see the current “crisis” as the sequel to another culture war waged at the close of the 20th century, this one against the archetypal degenerate: the artist. Did St. Augustine’s relentless 25-year campaign to criminalize anyone drawing, singing, playing music, painting or entertaining on St. George Street contribute to increased panhandling while tarnishing its ambience and authenticity?
***
Anthea Churchman, a living historian, has lived and worked in St. Augustine since 1983, when historic-oriented entertainers populated St. George Street with hammered dulcimers, fiddlers, colonial puppetry and artists with easels.
“There were very few panhandlers on St. George until after the city adopted the street performer ordinance, making art and music a crime,” she recalled.
“The city created a vacuum,” said Helena Sala, a visual artist who successfully sued St. Augustine for First Amendment violations. “It’s a political situation.”
“Homeless” and “panhandlers” are not synonyms. “There’s a lot of compassion for the truly homeless, people down on their luck,” Sala said. She calls many panhandlers “opportunists” creating a “racket.”
St. George Street was once alive with buskers, music, artists, fun and spontaneity. But by 1996, the talented artists, musicians and buskers were called “vermin” and “gypsies” by then-Mayor Claude Leonard “Len” Weeks Jr., a commercial landlord. That’s when the itty-bitty city began passing ordinances banning art and music on St. Augustine’s historic streets.
City burghers criminalized singing, playing music, painting, drawing and entertaining along St. George Street, citing spurious public safety concerns. People were allegedly blocking sidewalks and having a good time being entertained as their partners shopped in the once-hip shops on the popular pedestrian street. The authorities promised alternative venues for street entertainment, including the Plaza de la Constitución. Promises were broken, leading to litigation.
Now, after several lawsuits, the city’s odd anti-artist ordinances remain—holdovers from Weeks’ Kulturkampf. 
St. George Street has lost its historic charm and heritage-related stores; it is dominated by kitsch commerce and panhandlers.
***
Yes, the artists were replaced by panhandlers, both on the street and in the crosshairs of city authorities—and vigilantes.
“The actions of the city over the years has taken a toll on the number of artists willing to face jail and fight for their rights,” Cushman told Folio Weekly. “And the artists have, to a certain extent, been replaced by poor, hungry individuals, victims of hard financial times. This is a more complex problem than the artists have fought, and sometimes the city’s response has been better, sometimes not.”
As evidence of the latter, in 2018, St. Augustine hired Michael Kahn, the same lawyer who crafted the anti-artist ordinances—which created the panhandling problem—to save the day. No outside peer review, no law professors, just another con job.
“Kahn was hired to clean up the mess that he created,” said Sala.
Peripatetic, self-promoting Melbourne constitutional lawyer Michael Kahn has billed the city of St. Augustine at least $204,509.26 for legal work to criminalize art and music on St. George Street, running off buskers and artists and musicians, and regulating adult entertainment.
The city’s modus operandi has been to create “crises” by non-enforcement, then seek draconian legislation to remedy them. During 2017-’18, after a Tampa federal court upheld panhandlers’ First Amendment rights, authorities in St. Augustine went more than eight months without enforcing its aggressive panhandling ordinance. Kahn concocted his latest ordinance as a First Amendment workaround, and he charged the city $25,000 for it (with a rider stipulating that he would be paid $300/hour to defend it in court). Then-Mayor Nancy Shaver candidly called the agreement a “loss leader.”
Among the witnesses called by Kahn at his 2018 panhandling hearing was Weeks, who helped Kahn cause the panhandling problem in the first place. The former mayor testified that a homeless man urinated outside the window of his office on Cuna Street. He then showed photos of a man sleeping on the ground. (The man later died.)
Another witness, Roy Hinman, M.D., expertly testified to the potential public health risks posed by feces and urine left in public spaces.
Kahn’s ordinance passed, but none of Dr. Hinman’s recommendations appear to have been implemented. Nor was the ordinance amended to remove a possibly unconstitutional provision: a ban on panhandling free speech within 20 feet of any business entrance. The prohibition could run afoul of McCullen v. Coakley, the Supreme Court’s decision against a Massachusetts law banning people within 35 feet of an abortion clinic. Neither the city nor Kahn ever responded to years of questions about that legal precedent.
There are more sweeping precedents as well. In the landmark 1972 case, Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, the Supreme Court unanimously struck down Jacksonville’s criminal vagrancy law as unconstitutional. Justice William O. Douglas delivered the lyrical decision, citing Henry David Thoreau and Walt Whitman—supporters of nonconformity—and finding the law was “void for vagueness” because it “encouraged arbitrary arrests and convictions” and did not place citizens on notice of what conduct was prohibited.
(Turns out, Jacksonville Ordinance Code § 257 criminalized bohemians with a too-broad brush: “Rogues and vagabonds, or dissolute persons who go about begging; common gamblers, persons who use juggling or unlawful games or plays, common drunkards, common night walkers, thieves, pilferers or pickpockets, traders in stolen property, lewd, wanton and lascivious persons, keepers of gambling places, common railers and brawlers, persons wandering or strolling around from place to place without any lawful purpose or object, habitual loafers, disorderly persons, persons neglecting all lawful business and habitually spending their time by frequenting houses of ill fame, gaming houses, or places where alcoholic beverages are sold or served, persons able to work but habitually living upon the earnings of their wives or minor children shall be deemed vagrants and, upon conviction in the Municipal Court shall be punished as provided for Class D offenses.”)
***
As draconian as Kahn’s ordinance is, local vigilantes want to go even further. Enter St. Augustine Vagrant Watch & St. Augustine Citizen Night Watch—two names for one Facebook group. Moderators Wade Ross and Evelyn Hammock were called as witnesses when Kahn pitched his ordinance in 2018. Ross, Hammock and other members remain active, harassing and gossiping about people downtown. Like Jacksonville’s unconstitutional ordinance, these vigilantes use the archaic term “vagrant” to smear the targets of their ire.
Some vagrant-watchers are more active than others. Hammock was arrested just before midnight Feb. 14, 2019. She was patrolling the grounds of the city-owned Lightner Museum and City Hall with a Ruger pistol (and a valid concealed-carry permit), apparently looking for sleeping homeless people to report or confront. The State Attorney has since dismissed the charges.
Why is Vagrant Watch so aggressive? Members believe that the St. Augustine Police Department isn’t enforcing Kahn’s ordinance as robustly as it should. SAPD Chief Barry Fox emphasizes empathy, social services, warnings and citations, not the mass arrest of homeless people for victimless crimes. As Lincolnville resident Mark Frazier said, “It’s time to solve our problems rather than try to arrest our way out of them.”
As a result, hardliners like Vagrant Watch are now accusing the city of being too merciful with people experiencing homelessness. St. Augustine is, after all, an internationally recognized “Compassionate City,” one of the first.
On Feb. 27, 2019, Vagrant Watch went so far as to appeal to scandal-ridden St. Johns County Sheriff David Shoar, asking him to send deputies to make the arrests it claims SAPD will not. Shoar demurred.
One city lawman quipped that the vigilantes would “like to round up the homeless, put them on cattle cars and send them to concentration camps.”
As if on cue, a letter published in The St. Augustine Record on March 18 stated, "I think it is about time that county and city leaders, as well as the police department and Sheriff's Office, do their jobs and get rid of the homeless."
***
Subjected to illegal arrests, fired from jobs when employers learn they’re homeless, priced out of affordable housing by dodgy developers, stalked by vigilantes: Welcome to the world of the poor and homeless in St. Augustine, Florida. Five million tourists visit annually, yet workers seek living wages and affordable housing in vain.
Solutions to homelessness and panhandling—separate but related problems—continue to evade local leaders, who refuse to even discuss living-wage laws, rent control and enforcement requirements for affordable housing.

Investigations underway into sexual misconduct allegations at Florida National Guard One of those named is the guard’s deputy commander, who is eligible to take over when the current leader retires April 6. -- Gov. Ron DeSantis hasn’t announced a replacement yet. (Tampa Bay Times)

$
0
0
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MUST INVESTIGATE THE FLORIDA NATIONAL GUARD, HEADQUARTERED HERE IN ST. AUGUSTINE.



Investigations underway into sexual misconduct allegations at Florida National Guard

One of those named is the guard’s deputy commander, who is eligible to take over when the current leader retires April 6. Gov. Ron DeSantis hasn’t announced a replacement yet.
Published Earlier Today
Updated 3 hours ago

Worth Knowing.
Worth Subscribing.99¢ for the first month
Maj. Gen. Michael Calhoun retires April 6 as commander of the Florida National Guard and Gov. Ron DeSantis will name a replacement.
But the search comes while the guard — some 12,000 soldiers and airmen who deploy to combat zones and help at home in natural disasters — is facing ongoing investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct and coverups that date back a decade, the Tampa Bay Times has learned.
Among the allegations: that an officer joked he would hang a sign-up sheet outside the office of a female contractor so people could sign up for sexual favors from her in 15-minute increments.
Some of the allegations are spelled out in an email to a state lawmaker written by Maj. Elliot Potter, a Tampa-based officer in the Florida National Guard’s Judge Advocate General Corps. Potter researched the allegations and forwarded them to his superiors. A copy of his email was obtained by the Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
One man Potter accuses in a coverup is the guard’s No. 2 in command, Brig. Gen. Mike Canzoneri, who is among a group of officers eligible to replace Calhoun.
According to Potter, Canzoneri and another officer “have actively concealed evidence of sexual misconduct and other violence committed against soldiers of the Florida National Guard.”
DeSantis, a former attorney with the Navy Judge Advocate General, said through a spokeswoman that he could not comment on an ongoing investigation. Canzoneri also declined to comment.
As of this week, DeSantis had not announced Calhoun’s replacement.
Potter sent his email to state Sen. Lauren Book, a Broward County Democrat. Book told the governor in a Jan. 16 letter that she was “inclined to believe” Potter. Investigations are underway at both the state and federal level, said Book spokeswoman Claire VanSusteren. 
In a statement to the Times earlier this month, Calhoun, the Florida National Guard leader, declined comment on specifics of any investigation, but said, “we are deeply troubled by these allegations.”
ADVERTISEMENT
“We expect all of our members to demonstrate our values,” Calhoun said, “including honor, integrity and respect for self and others — and will continue to take necessary steps to ensure we are held to the highest standards so that we are worthy of the faith and trust the public places in us.”
• • •
Among the people whose complaints fueled the investigations is Shira Callahan, a 46-year-old former civilian contractor for the guard who has filed sworn statements with the guard’s Inspector General’s Office. Callahan alleges a pattern of sexual misconduct and other wrongdoing by guard soldiers and leaders.
She said in an October 2017 sworn statement that Canzoneri came up to her during a break in a 2011 conference and “slowly ran his hand from one side of my bare shoulder to the other.”
She also said Canzoneri made sexual gestures to a female bartender during the same conference and ended a two-year affair he had with a female soldier then transferred the soldier after she refused to have sex with his friends.
What’s more, Callahan accused Canzoneri of covering up for another officer she named in her complaints — Lt. Col. Scott L. Taylor.
As a result of Callahan’s allegations, Taylor was found to have “created an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment” for her, according to a September 2017 letter from Army Col. Leslie F. Caballero, inspector general with the Florida National Guard.
Caballero called it “conduct that brings discredit to the Florida National Guard.”
Those findings, signed off on by Calhoun, also included recommendations for changes in guard policies. They include ensuring that everyone considered for key positions is thoroughly screened and that personnel pass along information to commanders about “problem soldiers.”
Six months after Caballero’s letter, on May 1, Taylor was named division chief at the Florida National Guard Joint Force Headquarters — the latest in a series of rank and job promotions despite complaints against him from Callahan and others.
In another of those complaints, former Sgt. Maj. Alan Rizzo — who acknowledged he and Taylor had a history of “bad blood” — said he was “extremely concerned about the close personal relationship between” Taylor and Canzoneri.
Callahan said she cannot understand Taylor’s rise in the ranks.
She sees parallels between allegations against the Florida National Guard and the fear of coming forward expressed earlier this month by Arizona Sen. Martha McSally. A pioneering combat pilot, McSally told a Senate hearing that she never reported she was raped by a superior officer when she served in the Air Force because she didn't trust the system.
Said Callahan, “Had she reported her assault, I have no doubt she would have been re-victimized all over again. Leadership may say what is expected in broad strokes ... but their day-to-day actions and attitudes demonstrate a reluctance to bring about real change towards a systemic problem.”
Taylor, in a phone interview, denied the allegations against him and said he does not have a close relationship with Canzoneri. 
He said he has been targeted by a small group of former guard personnel whom he had disciplined. They’re out to ruin his reputation through the military’s complaints process, he said, filing more than 200 complaints against him.
“These individuals,” Taylor said, “have weaponized the process.”
He said he has statements from 10 witnesses rebutting the allegations against him but did not provide the statements. He later stopped returning messages from the Times.
• • •
It was in his role as a judge advocate general attorney that Potter received complaints against Canzoneri.
ADVERTISEMENT
He undertook a review and later learned that it overlapped with allegations against Taylor. The allegations come from people who all are friends, Callahan said. They include her, two former Florida Army National Guard soldiers, and the wife of one of the soldiers.
Callahan described the incident involving the sexual sign-up sheet during a recorded interview in June with Army Lt. Col. Adam Calderon. Calderon had been directed by Maj. Gen. Calhoun to investigate Taylor. 
As Taylor stood outside Callahan’s office one day, she said, he told a group of soldiers that he planned to post the sheet on her door “with 15-minute increments so that the entire battalion” could get sexual favors from her.
“But it came with the caveat that he couldn’t just stop it there,” she said during the interview, “that the number one spot was reserved for him ...”
She told Calderon about her communications with Potter regarding Potter’s research into Canzoneri, saying the lawyer “was not interested in anything having to deal with Taylor at first until he realized that you could not have one issue without the other.”
Potter, she said, submitted the results of his review “up the chain” to the Defense Department’s Office of Inspector General. 
Potter declined to comment for this story. Calderon confirmed the conversation with Callahan but declined to comment on its specifics or the results of his findings.
A Florida National Guard chaplain with whom Callahan also spoke, Army Col. Glenn Finch, said in a phone interview that he found Callahan credible.
“I believe her to be truthful,” Finch said. “She has no reason to lie, she has nothing to gain. I have a lot of respect for her and her courage.”
Callahan’s first request for action was to the guard’s inspector general, filed in March 2015. She said Taylor sexually harassed her in June 2011, and she reported incidents alleged to have involved Taylor with other people, among them: reports from two female soldiers that Taylor solicited sex from them via email in August 2012; sexual harassment of a male soldier in a shower in September 2012; and a physical assault against a female Army non-commissioned officer.
Callahan said in an interview that the complaints about email solicitations came to her in role as family support assistant to the guard. The male soldier filed a separate action request over the shower incident. The non-commissioned officer denied in an interview with the Times that Taylor assaulted her, saying they were just horsing around.
ADVERTISEMENT
• • •
The status of investigations into the Florida National Guard has been unclear during the first months of 2019.
On Feb. 7, the state Department of Military Affairs told Sen. Book that a three-week review had turned up no evidence of wrongdoing by Canzoneri or by a second officer accused of a coverup — Maj. Terrence Gorman. Gorman is the department’s deputy general counsel. The department provides management oversight of the guard.
About two weeks later, Callahan filed a sworn statement with Potter.
She reiterated her earlier complaints that Taylor had sexually harassed her and “generally harassed” others in her unit — and added that Gorman had advised her not to record or report the harassment “as it would ‘blackball’ me (Callahan) within the battalion.”
Asked by Potter if she believed Gorman was attempting to “protect the alleged perpetrator,” Callahan answered, “Yes. Absolutely.”
Gorman declined to comment for this story. 
Meantime, unsatisfied with the response from the Department of Military Affairs, Book asked how the department had reached its conclusions clearing Canzoneri and Gorman. The answer she received: An investigation is still ongoing.
Senior news researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report. Contact Howard Altman at haltman@tampabay.com. Follow@haltman.

ADVERTISEME

Investigations underway into sexual misconduct allegations at Florida National Guard

One of those named is the guard’s deputy commander, who is eligible to take over when the current leader retires April 6. Gov. Ron DeSantis hasn’t announced a replacement yet.
Published Earlier Today
Updated 3 hours ago

Worth Knowing.
Worth Subscribing.99¢ for the first month
Maj. Gen. Michael Calhoun retires April 6 as commander of the Florida National Guard and Gov. Ron DeSantis will name a replacement.
But the search comes while the guard — some 12,000 soldiers and airmen who deploy to combat zones and help at home in natural disasters — is facing ongoing investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct and coverups that date back a decade, the Tampa Bay Times has learned.
Among the allegations: that an officer joked he would hang a sign-up sheet outside the office of a female contractor so people could sign up for sexual favors from her in 15-minute increments.
Some of the allegations are spelled out in an email to a state lawmaker written by Maj. Elliot Potter, a Tampa-based officer in the Florida National Guard’s Judge Advocate General Corps. Potter researched the allegations and forwarded them to his superiors. A copy of his email was obtained by the Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
One man Potter accuses in a coverup is the guard’s No. 2 in command, Brig. Gen. Mike Canzoneri, who is among a group of officers eligible to replace Calhoun.
According to Potter, Canzoneri and another officer “have actively concealed evidence of sexual misconduct and other violence committed against soldiers of the Florida National Guard.”
DeSantis, a former attorney with the Navy Judge Advocate General, said through a spokeswoman that he could not comment on an ongoing investigation. Canzoneri also declined to comment.
As of this week, DeSantis had not announced Calhoun’s replacement.
Potter sent his email to state Sen. Lauren Book, a Broward County Democrat. Book told the governor in a Jan. 16 letter that she was “inclined to believe” Potter. Investigations are underway at both the state and federal level, said Book spokeswoman Claire VanSusteren. 
In a statement to the Times earlier this month, Calhoun, the Florida National Guard leader, declined comment on specifics of any investigation, but said, “we are deeply troubled by these allegations.”
ADVERTISEMENT
“We expect all of our members to demonstrate our values,” Calhoun said, “including honor, integrity and respect for self and others — and will continue to take necessary steps to ensure we are held to the highest standards so that we are worthy of the faith and trust the public places in us.”
• • •
Among the people whose complaints fueled the investigations is Shira Callahan, a 46-year-old former civilian contractor for the guard who has filed sworn statements with the guard’s Inspector General’s Office. Callahan alleges a pattern of sexual misconduct and other wrongdoing by guard soldiers and leaders.
She said in an October 2017 sworn statement that Canzoneri came up to her during a break in a 2011 conference and “slowly ran his hand from one side of my bare shoulder to the other.”
She also said Canzoneri made sexual gestures to a female bartender during the same conference and ended a two-year affair he had with a female soldier then transferred the soldier after she refused to have sex with his friends.
What’s more, Callahan accused Canzoneri of covering up for another officer she named in her complaints — Lt. Col. Scott L. Taylor.
As a result of Callahan’s allegations, Taylor was found to have “created an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment” for her, according to a September 2017 letter from Army Col. Leslie F. Caballero, inspector general with the Florida National Guard.
Caballero called it “conduct that brings discredit to the Florida National Guard.”
Those findings, signed off on by Calhoun, also included recommendations for changes in guard policies. They include ensuring that everyone considered for key positions is thoroughly screened and that personnel pass along information to commanders about “problem soldiers.”
Six months after Caballero’s letter, on May 1, Taylor was named division chief at the Florida National Guard Joint Force Headquarters — the latest in a series of rank and job promotions despite complaints against him from Callahan and others.
In another of those complaints, former Sgt. Maj. Alan Rizzo — who acknowledged he and Taylor had a history of “bad blood” — said he was “extremely concerned about the close personal relationship between” Taylor and Canzoneri.
Callahan said she cannot understand Taylor’s rise in the ranks.
She sees parallels between allegations against the Florida National Guard and the fear of coming forward expressed earlier this month by Arizona Sen. Martha McSally. A pioneering combat pilot, McSally told a Senate hearing that she never reported she was raped by a superior officer when she served in the Air Force because she didn't trust the system.
Said Callahan, “Had she reported her assault, I have no doubt she would have been re-victimized all over again. Leadership may say what is expected in broad strokes ... but their day-to-day actions and attitudes demonstrate a reluctance to bring about real change towards a systemic problem.”
Taylor, in a phone interview, denied the allegations against him and said he does not have a close relationship with Canzoneri. 
He said he has been targeted by a small group of former guard personnel whom he had disciplined. They’re out to ruin his reputation through the military’s complaints process, he said, filing more than 200 complaints against him.
“These individuals,” Taylor said, “have weaponized the process.”
He said he has statements from 10 witnesses rebutting the allegations against him but did not provide the statements. He later stopped returning messages from the Times.
• • •
It was in his role as a judge advocate general attorney that Potter received complaints against Canzoneri.
ADVERTISEMENT
He undertook a review and later learned that it overlapped with allegations against Taylor. The allegations come from people who all are friends, Callahan said. They include her, two former Florida Army National Guard soldiers, and the wife of one of the soldiers.
Callahan described the incident involving the sexual sign-up sheet during a recorded interview in June with Army Lt. Col. Adam Calderon. Calderon had been directed by Maj. Gen. Calhoun to investigate Taylor. 
As Taylor stood outside Callahan’s office one day, she said, he told a group of soldiers that he planned to post the sheet on her door “with 15-minute increments so that the entire battalion” could get sexual favors from her.
“But it came with the caveat that he couldn’t just stop it there,” she said during the interview, “that the number one spot was reserved for him ...”
She told Calderon about her communications with Potter regarding Potter’s research into Canzoneri, saying the lawyer “was not interested in anything having to deal with Taylor at first until he realized that you could not have one issue without the other.”
Potter, she said, submitted the results of his review “up the chain” to the Defense Department’s Office of Inspector General. 
Potter declined to comment for this story. Calderon confirmed the conversation with Callahan but declined to comment on its specifics or the results of his findings.
A Florida National Guard chaplain with whom Callahan also spoke, Army Col. Glenn Finch, said in a phone interview that he found Callahan credible.
“I believe her to be truthful,” Finch said. “She has no reason to lie, she has nothing to gain. I have a lot of respect for her and her courage.”
Callahan’s first request for action was to the guard’s inspector general, filed in March 2015. She said Taylor sexually harassed her in June 2011, and she reported incidents alleged to have involved Taylor with other people, among them: reports from two female soldiers that Taylor solicited sex from them via email in August 2012; sexual harassment of a male soldier in a shower in September 2012; and a physical assault against a female Army non-commissioned officer.
Callahan said in an interview that the complaints about email solicitations came to her in role as family support assistant to the guard. The male soldier filed a separate action request over the shower incident. The non-commissioned officer denied in an interview with the Times that Taylor assaulted her, saying they were just horsing around.
ADVERTISEMENT
• • •
The status of investigations into the Florida National Guard has been unclear during the first months of 2019.
On Feb. 7, the state Department of Military Affairs told Sen. Book that a three-week review had turned up no evidence of wrongdoing by Canzoneri or by a second officer accused of a coverup — Maj. Terrence Gorman. Gorman is the department’s deputy general counsel. The department provides management oversight of the guard.
About two weeks later, Callahan filed a sworn statement with Potter.
She reiterated her earlier complaints that Taylor had sexually harassed her and “generally harassed” others in her unit — and added that Gorman had advised her not to record or report the harassment “as it would ‘blackball’ me (Callahan) within the battalion.”
Asked by Potter if she believed Gorman was attempting to “protect the alleged perpetrator,” Callahan answered, “Yes. Absolutely.”
Gorman declined to comment for this story. 
Meantime, unsatisfied with the response from the Department of Military Affairs, Book asked how the department had reached its conclusions clearing Canzoneri and Gorman. The answer she received: An investigation is still ongoing.
Senior news researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report. Contact Howard Altman at haltman@tampabay.com. Follow@haltman.

ADVERTISEME

FBI and FDLE: NOTICE THE DATE ON THIS DOCUMENT RE: SHERIFF DAVID SHOAR'S TRAINING CENTER

$
0
0





St. Johns County Sheriff’s Tactical Training Center – Civil Engineering Design Services Phase I
RAM is pleased to have been named as the Engineer-of-Record for the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Training Center Project Phase 1 which includes permitting and construction documents preparation, beginning with the earthwork, for the 49-acre site.
This task includes the completion of design and preparation of construction documents for the identified elements of the Phase I portion of the Site Plan. The design will adhere to the requirements identified in the approved P.U.D. 2014-16, per Ordinance 2015-7; and St. Johns County Development requirements.

For more information on the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office, please visit their website at: http://www.sjso.org/

DOJ, FBI, Governor DeSANTIS, FDLE must investigate possibly illegal spending by Sheriff DAVID SHOAR

$
0
0


Commissioners raise concerns about early work on Sheriff's Office training center
By Jared Keever
Posted Mar 27, 2019 at 12:01 AM
St. Augustine Record



Just a little more than a month after they voted to fund the construction of a training center for the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office, county commissioners have raised questions about work done on the property ahead of that vote.

The issue came up at the end of the commissioner’s March 19 meeting when Commissioner Jimmy Johns said he had been contacted by Jacksonville-based engineering firm RAM with concerns that they had been told they were “precluded from participating in the design build process” of the $15 million project because they had already provided some form of “design services” in the early phases of the work.

“I simply passed that on to staff and it’s become a lot more complicated,” he said.

What Johns said he got back from county staff was a collection of documents consisting of a timeline “and documentation to back up that timeline that’s thicker than our agenda book.”

“My primary concern is that, in summary, it appears that the board did not approve funding for the Sheriff’s facility in our budget, the Sheriff used funds from some other sources to have design work performed, I was never made privy to that design work related to a roadway to the future Sheriff’s facilities in conversations with staff or the Sheriff’s Office when discussing the $15 million item,” he said. “And that’s why I am asking questions.”

That set the stage for a roughly 15-minute conversation that ended with commissioners voting unanimously to have County administration send a letter to the St. Johns County Clerk of Court & Comptroller’s Office asking the Inspector General there to look into the matter.

During the course of that conversation Commissioner Jeb Smith referenced an estimated $700,000 that Sheriff David Shoar said in an October presentation that his agency had spent on site preparation to get the roughly 50-acre plot of land, which is owned by the county, ready for the project.

Of that, according to documents that he had been provided by Johns, $59,000 had been paid by the Sheriff’s Office to RAM, Smith said.

“Where did the funding come from?” he said.


Reached by phone early Tuesday afternoon, Smith said his concern was that, although the commissioners originally gave the green light for the project back in 2015, it was his understanding that getting started on the work was contingent on funding — the final vote for which didn’t come until their meeting on Feb. 5 of this year.

“But the Sheriff went ahead and started in on the project and he funded it,” said Smith, who voted against the funding measure.

In addition, he said that he had not seen any accounting for proceeds from timber sales on 53 acres that had been cleared.

Shoar, in a phone interview later Tuesday evening, said his agency did everything they were supposed to and took issue with the notion that the 2015 vote didn’t give him the go-ahead to get to work on prepping the land.



He called much of what Johns said at the meeting “unintelligible nonsense” and pointed out that all of the money spent out of his own agency, the land clearing, and a water management permit that had been secured was all disclosed at his October presentation and it should come as no surprise to Johns, an engineer, that the permit could not have been secured without the work of an engineer.

Asked about that on Tuesday, Johns said that “we can all sit down and have this conversation but I don’t want to he-said, she-said over the phone.”

And although Shoar said he knew that both Johns and Smith said they weren’t alleging that anything improper had taken place, he also took issue with the way the topic was brought up at the end of a meeting with no one from his agency present to defend it.


“I take great offense to the way it was done,” he said. “In my opinion they tried to cast aspersions on the project.”

Shoar said it was his opinion that Johns and Smith had both obstructed the project.

Johns, who did vote to approve the funding in February, “has moved the goal post” since the beginning, Shoar said.

The entire item will likely come back up at the commission’s April 2 meeting.

County Attorney Patrick McCormack said early Tuesday that he had been researching what the clerk has jurisdiction to review when another constitutional office, like the Sheriff’s Offic,e is involved and that the letter had not been drafted.

He also said that after a preliminary review of RAM’s involvement in the early stages of the project — following Johns’ raising of concerns — it is not entirely clear that they will be ineligible to participate in future work.

In a followup phone conversation, McCormack said that, though the letter still had not been drafted, he had spoken directly with the Clerk’s Office and said it is “anticipated” they will “review the matter” in so far as “compliance or non-compliance with the county’s purchasing and land development regulations” are concerned.

“That will be reviewed and reported on,” he said.





SJR State College Faculty Votes UNION by 83-27 vote, St. Augustine Record reports it one month later

$
0
0







From United Faculty of Florida Facebook post, February 26, 2019:



BREAKING NEWS!
The faculty of St. Johns River State College (SJRSC) have spoken and by a vote of 83-27 establish the newest chapter of the United Faculty of Florida (UFF). The vote count followed a three-week period of secret balloting by mail and was certified today by the Florida Public Employees Relations Commission. In all, 77 percent of the faculty voted in the election.
Sandra Dotson-Kirn, SJRSC Nursing Instructor:
“This is a huge move in the right direction, improving communication between administrators and employees. I see positive things happening in the future for both!”
Clay Moore, SJRSC Faculty Senate President, Biological Sciences Professor:
“Having a chapter of United Faculty of Florida at SJR State is another important step forward for the faculty and their collaboration with the administration in the shared governance of the college.”
Dr. Bruce Fox, SJRSC Spanish Professor:
“I am very excited that we will now have a faculty union here at SJR State! This is not at all a repudiation of our administrators or an ‘us-versus-them’ movement. This unionization effort has been about developing and enhancing shared governance and establishing collective bargaining as legal equals under Florida’s Constitution.”
Dr. Karen Morian, President of UFF:
“I congratulate the St. Johns River State College faculty as it becomes our 31st chapter, as well as the 14th Florida college, to become part of United Faculty of Florida. Each of these faculty union drives were initiated by local faculty, not union staff or state union leaders. No one outside of their institutions collected any cards. They all filed with nearly double the required authorizations and majority membership. This is historic and a national example to the labor movement. We are thrilled to add their passion, expertise and professionalism to our efforts to improve higher education in the state of Florida." 
Background:
St. Johns River faculty join faculty at Pasco-Hernando State College, Lake Sumter State College, Tallahassee Community College, State College of Florida (Manatee-Sarasota) and Florida Polytechnic University in voting for union representation since 2016. In all, the United Faculty of Florida has grown from 25 to 31 chapters since 2016 as faculty and higher education professionals realize that higher education needs the collective voices of faculty to support high quality education and to promote adequate and fair funding for our public institutions.
SJRSC serves Putnam, Clay and St. Johns counties, which include Palatka, St. Augustine and Orange Park. It is known for being the location of the Florida School of the Arts (Floarts). Opened in 1976, Floarts is one of the premier public art colleges in Florida. SJR State awards its students technical certificates, A.A., A.S. and B.A. degrees. The college is also known for its excellent nursing program, and recently started an LPN certificate. Faculty have published articles in high-profile scholarly academic journals, books by academic and commercial presses, as well as presenting at conferences focused on teaching innovations.
Join me in Welcoming our new members!



From St. Augustine Record, March 29, 2019, page one, below fold

SJR State faculty union forms
By Travis Gibson



There was one phrase that kept coming up when St. Johns River State College Organizing Committee Co-Chair and professor J. Maggio spoke to The Record about the recent formation of a faculty union at the school — shared governance.

“The No. 1 thing we wanted was shared governance,” Maggio said in a phone interview Wednesday. “Some felt rules coming down from the administration, which were not all bad, they came down from the administration with no consultation from the faculty.”

In a February vote, the faculty voted overwhelmingly (83-27) to form the newest chapter of the United Faculty of Florida. In all, about 77 percent of the 141-person faculty voted in the election. The union process from discussion to vote took about two years, said Maggio, a political science professor at the school. Maggio said that although the administration didn’t see a need for a union, they were also non-confrontational during the process, which isn’t always the case when workers attempt to form a union.

“They did not put up an anti-union fight, which was surprising,” Maggio said. “Compared to other places they behaved in a very congenial way. There were no complaints from the union committee on what they did.”

SJR State President Joe Pickens said that was a conscious decision.

“I didn’t think there was a need to try to oppose the union formation,” Pickens told The Record. “As the leader of the college the best way to lead the college it to respect the process and let the faculty decide.”

The union hopes to keep its positive working relationship going as it moves forward to address some of the main concerns of faculty members. One of those issues is pay and the fact that there is no rubric for getting raises, Maggio said.


“There is no way that faculty can get a raise outside of benevolence of the trustees,” Maggio said. “One way they would get around it is they would give one-time Christmas bonuses, but that doesn’t build on salary over time.”

He said the lack of structured raises has led to issues. For example, Maggio said a recent new hire who had been an adjunct professor for 11 years came in and made more money than a professor that had worked SJR State for the last 15 years.


Maggio said the union is exploring the possibility of merit or seniority based raises and plans to bring those ideas to the negotiating table in the future. The union also hopes to push for more academic autonomy and the formation of a more formal grievance process.

The formation of the union at SJR State follows a recent trend around the state. Pasco-Hernando State College, Lake Sumter State College, Tallahassee Community College, State College of Florida (Manatee-Sarasota) and Florida Polytechnic University have all voted to form a union since 2016, growing the number of United Faculty of Florida chapters to 31.

“They all filed with nearly double the required authorizations and majority membership. This is historic and a national example to the labor movement,” said Dr. Karen Morian, President of UFF. “We are thrilled to add their passion, expertise and professionalism to our efforts to improve higher education in the state of Florida.”





Legislature’s planned toll road project could benefit Florida’s richest man (Florida Phoenix)

$
0
0








Legislature’s planned road project could benefit Florida’s richest man

The approved master development plan
Thomas Peterffy
A push in the state Legislature for a new toll road system through North-Central Florida could benefit the richest man in Florida.
Thomas Peterffy, reportedly a member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club and a resident of Billionaire’s Row in Palm Beach, bought about 561,000 acres in 2015 – a tract the size of Rhode Island – in the rural Panhandle, including land in Lafayette, Dixie and Taylor counties.  A large swath of the land includes an already-approved massive development corridor in rural Taylor County which envisions intense residential and commercial building.  It’s very rural now, but a new toll road would bring traffic and infrastructure – including connections for water, sewer and telecommunications – to the region.
Peterffy, as well as the two wealthy men who sold him the land five years ago, have given hundreds of thousands of dollars to Florida Republican political committees and candidates, state records show. Peterffy gave $310,000 to the Friends of Ron DeSantis and to a Republican political action committee called the Fund for Florida’s Future in 2017-2018. Peterffy is listed by Forbes as the 25th richest person in America.
The exact corridor for the toll roads – a top priority of Republican state Senate President Bill Galvano from Bradenton – isn’t yet mapped out for the public. But, generally, the plan calls for:
– A “Suncoast Connector” highway to extend the Suncoast Parkway from north of Tampa up to North Florida’s Jefferson County, along the Georgia border.
– A highway to link Polk County to Collier County, the “Southwest Central Florida Corridor.”
– A “Northern Turnpike connector” to extend the Florida Turnpike northwest from I-75 in Wildwood to the Suncoast Parkway on the state’s west coast.
Under the plan, drivers would have to pay to travel through an area they once used for free.
The Tampa-to-Georgia portion of the toll road network could go through the huge tract that was master-planned years ago by a consultant to Taylor County and approved by Florida’s now-defunct land-planning agency, the Department of Community Affairs, under former Gov. Charlie Crist.
Land in the area has long been controlled by various Republican campaign donors. The land Peterffy owns now was held by Bush family political contributors Robert Day and Howard Leach. Leach was Ambassador to France under President George W. Bush. He gave $100,000 to Friends of Ron DeSantis last year.
The polluting Georgia Pacific wood cellulose mill that sits on Taylor County’s fouled Fenholloway River is owned by Republican mega-donors Charles and David Koch. Bo Taff, a former state official for Gov. Jeb Bush, was tapped to shepherd Taylor County’s development approvals.
Peterffy bought the land in 2015, through his company Four Rivers Land & Timber. The master development plan came with the property, and it allows over 45,000 mixed-use development acres,  25,600 residential units and more than 10 million square feet of industrial and non-residential land use, according to county economic development records.
Florida Senate President Galvano said through spokeswoman Katie Betta that he doesn’t know Peterffy, and pointed out that the exact path of the proposed roads isn’t known yet. Betta said that will be determined later, after input from local governments and state agencies.
Republican state Sen. Tom Lee, a homebuilder who represents parts of Hillsborough, Pasco and Polk counties, is sponsoring the bill in the legislature to create the new regional toll road system. He said he does not know Peterffy.
Lee told lawmakers at a recent committee meeting that one of the goals is to spur development in rural areas that growth has passed by. Dave Cullen, a lobbyist for the Sierra Club, called the toll-road plan “a recipe for sprawl.”
“That’s all you need for exploding development, because the land would be comparatively cheap,” Cullen said, “and they’ll come put in as many houses as they can sell as quickly as possible, and this state will suffer.”
The legislation projects that the new toll roads would open a decade from now, but the state would start spending millions to plan them as soon as next year.  The Senate bill says the project would cost $45 million in FY 2020, $90 million in 2021 and then $135 million annually through 2030, a total of more than $1.3 billion, which would then pay for a state turnpike bond to pay for program.
In touting the toll road plan, Senate President Galvano said that rural areas face a problem “because so often those communities get forgotten, economically and otherwise.”
According to Florida Trend magazine, Peterffy also bought a 32,000-acre tract in Highlands County several years ago. That area is a possible route for the new planned toll road connector to link Polk and Collier counties. The land once belonged to the heirs of citrus magnate Ben Hill Griffin, Jr.
Galvano told the Tampa Bay Times last month that the idea for the toll road plan came to him after he held discussions with the Florida Transportation Builders Association, which represents state road and bridge builders, and the Florida Chamber of Commerce. Both groups contributed to his Innovate Florida political action committee when he was running for Senate president.
No one from Peterffy’s Four Rivers Land & Development company would comment for this story.
Peterffy made his money by creating electronic trading networks (Interactive Brokers) for the stock market. An immigrant who came to America from Hungary, he spent millions in 2016 on political television ads during the Trump campaign urging people to vote Republican and issuing a warning about the dangers of socialism.
Two years ago, he sold the largest estate in pricey Greenwich, Connecticut for $21 million, and this year bought a $22 million four-bed apartment on Fifth Avenue overlooking Central Park. His Palm Beach estate is on South Ocean Drive, near Trump’s Mar-a-Lago.
Even with a master development plan in place, it may be hard to attract people to come to live in Taylor County. That’s because the Foley cellulose mill there – owned by Procter & Gamble for years and now owned by Koch Industries subsidiary Georgia Pacific – has caused massive industrial waste pollution in the Fenholloway River, including a wide “dead zone” where the river empties into the Gulf. In 1947, the state designated the spring-fed Fenholloway as the only Florida river officially set aside for industrial use. Under a special law, any company there could dump whatever it wanted into the river.  In the 1990s, the state confirmed that groundwater in the area is contaminated with pulp mill chemicals, including some private wells. Georgia Pacific has a plan to build a pipeline to the river’s mouth to dispose of the mill’s industrial waste there, closer to the Gulf. The mill is legally allowed to discharge 50 million gallons of wastewater a day.
Reporter Mitch Perry contributed to this story. 

GUEST COLUMN: Bury S.R. 313 plan — once and for all. (SAR)

$
0
0
I agree with Mr. Johnson, and have spoken out against this insipid project, which is supported by rebarbative roadbuilders and misguided other-directed elected officials. The project threatens to destroy Twelve Mile Swamp, a national treasure that needs to be included in the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore.



By Tim Johnson / St. Augustine
Posted Mar 31, 2019 at 2:01 AM

Here we go again. The No. 1 transportation priority for St. Johns County is a 1980s styled boondoggle known as State Road 313. The concept for this project has been around for more than 30 years but has never been close to being fully funded. I wonder why? Is the need really pressing? Evidently not.

Rep. Cyndi Stevenson is requesting $5.2 million to further the S.R. 313 project. As the FDOT notes: “FPI# 210230-2: The southern segment of SR 313 is approximately 4 miles long and begins at S.R. 207 and ends at S.R. 16. Currently the design plans are at 30 percent and design is on hold, right-of-way is ongoing and there is currently no construction funding.”

What will $5.2 million get the county? More designs for a six-lane highway that will culminate in the decimation of wooded areas, marshlands and ponds, while the surrounding areas are devoured by ever-expanding housing developments?


Let’s be clear about the costs. $5.2 million is not going to cover the cost of this ill-placed, poorly conceived autobahn. Estimates over the years have suggested the price will be well over 10 times the amount requested by Rep. Stevenson. Is this where the State Legislature wants to direct funding in the midst of budgetary restraints and the more pressing transportation needs in the northern part of St. Johns County and within the city of St. Augustine? How will this project alleviate traffic concerns in St. Augustine, when more and more people want to get into the city and not around it as the plans for S.R. 313 contends? Over the years many citizens have expressed grave concerns about this project by supporting the “Stop 313” movement. They will continue to do so as long as they continue to believe that reasonable budgetary and environmental arguments will convince elected officials to give up on a project dating back to the 1980s. Nostalgia for 80s music and television shows is understandable, but not for outdated highway plans. We can do better; indeed, much better for the citizens of this marvelous county.

Who benefits from less drama? by Capt. Lee Geanuleas, U.S.N. (Ret.). (HCN)

$
0
0


I agree wit Capt. Lee Geanuleas's riposte to yet another misguided St. Augustine Record editorial.

Heroic Mayor Nancy Shaver did such a good job holding City Hall denizen-doormats for contractors and developers accountable that she was re-elected twice in landslides. Now the Establishment would like to alter or abolish the job of Mayor.

"Hypocrisy is the compliment that vice pays to virtue." -- Francois de La Rochefoucauld




Guest: Who benefits from less drama?

March 20, 2019

Lee Geanuleas
St. Augustine, FL

Special to Historic City News

On March 9, 2019 The St Augustine Record published an editorial titled “Tracy is the right person at the right time,” extolling the selection of former Mayor-Commissioner Tracy Upchurch to fill the remainder of Mayor Nancy Shaver’s term. Mayor Shaver resigned after suffering a stroke on February 25th at the end of an emotional City Commission meeting.

Along with citing the new mayor’s strong record of public service, the editorial predicted that with the departure of Shaver and the arrival of Upchurch, “the drama” at City Commission meetings was “likely to take a break.” The editorial went on to criticize former Mayor Shaver as, “pushing her own agenda” and trying to, “enjoin other Commissioners to fall in line.” The Record’s message was that with a change of mayors, peace and gentility would grace the discourse among St Augustine’s only elected officials.

While I don’t know Mayor Upchurch, his record certainly elicits respect for his professional accomplishments and public service. My concern is not necessarily with the new mayor, but with the editorial’s implications that good government should be pleasant, gentile and not involve passionate debate, disagreement and commitment to strongly held beliefs of what is right for the people of the city. The Record’s editorial might lead one to believe the city is being governed best when it’s Commissioners all hug each and sing Kumbaya at the end of each meeting.

While that vision may be attractive to some, particularly those who don’t want tough questions asked about, for example, ever-increasing traffic congestion or a planned unit development (PUD) application, it reflects an unrealistic understanding of how government operates. Even in a small city like St Augustine there will be conflicting interests and at virtually every Commission meeting, questions arise weighing the interests of one party against those of another.

For example, a developer wants the city to approve a PUD that will financially benefit him or her, create an attraction for tourists, and add to the city’s property tax revenue. But it is likely that same development will negatively impact the lives of the residents living next to it and add to congestion. As is usually the case, a rational person could argue either side of the issue and there is no one “right answer.” And given the room allowed by City Code for subjective judgement, it would not be unusual for Commissioners to differ in their opinions of what’s right. One Commissioner might view the additional tax revenue as the most important aspect while another might prioritize the neighbor’s quality of life.

Should we expect the city’s elected representatives to stifle their opinions on deciding these types of questions in favor of faux-consensus and feel-good camaraderie? Or, should we want Commissioners willing to take a stand on behalf of what they believe is right? And what if that means one of five Commissioners is not “on board” with the others? Should we expect that person to pretend, for the sake of some utopian vision of local government, that he or she doesn’t believe what they believe? Of course not.

With so much political angst at the national level, it is understandable for people to want peace and good feelings to reign at the local level. But, it’s important to remember that even the founding of the American republic was fraught with intense political disagreement and strong personal animosities – animosities that make anything witnessed in St Augustine’s Alcazar Room seem like a kindergarten spat. Jefferson and Hamilton hated each other, yet both contributed in significant ways to our great country. Should we condemn Thomas Jefferson, principal author of the Declaration of Independence and our third president, for the rancor he showed Hamilton? Should we disown Alexander Hamilton’s extraordinary contributions to the modern federal system because he intentionally created political “drama?” I should hope not.

Contrary to the myths we tell ourselves about our system of government, it’s all about politics, and politics is tough business, at all levels. Whether you’re voting on a fifty-billion-dollar federal appropriation or a deciding on whether to spend $500,000 in precious city reserve funds for a neighborhood park, there will be those who benefit and those who do not. And, who benefits and who does not, involves politics.

In the example of the neighborhood park, there are “winners” who live nearby, who get to enjoy the park and an improved quality of life. But there are “losers” too, like those who must suffer another year driving down a severely pot-holed street or those unable to get city Code Enforcement to respond to a violation because of chronic staffing short-falls.

If you were to buy The Record’s vision of city government, a Commissioner who sincerely believed that the neighborhood park money would be better spent elsewhere and dared to speak out about it, is considered someone “pushing their own agenda.” And remember, because of Florida’s sunshine laws, there is no opportunity for Commissioners to speak privately about issues with each other. Every conversation must occur in “the sunshine,” in public and in front of the cameras. So, the only opportunity for a Commissioner to convince the others to “fall in line,” is to make the case as best he or she can in public at a Commission meeting.

That’s what Nancy Shaver did on the question of the Coquina Avenue park acquisition; she tried to convince her colleagues and the citizens of the city that the City Commission’s initial vote in favor of the purchase was based on bad information and needed to be reconsidered.

Apparently, The Record frowns upon this sort of behavior by someone elected to represent the citizens of the city. But, unfortunately, they don’t provide an alternative course of action.

On more than one occasion during her mayoral tenure, Nancy Shaver took an independent approach. Often she was the only Commissioner asking tough questions, such as why a commercial PUD should be allowed in a residential neighborhood, or why a developer already approved to build a hotel with underground parking couldn’t build what was approved and now, without justification, needed to consume more of a vital historic preservation district or, as she did at her final meeting, asking for an explanation of why the Commission had been misinformed by city staff on the question of legal access to a storm water outfall that lead to a grievously flawed vote.

While the other Commissioners often were quick and happy to agree with virtually everything served up to them by City Manager John Regan, Shaver could usually be counted on to push back. Yes, her questions might have been unwelcomed – even embarrassing to some. Perhaps she didn’t get the “shut up and go along with the agenda” memo and viewed her duty as promoting greater government transparency and protecting the interests of city residents. Regardless, it is likely those who profit from the city’s ever-expanding tourism industry and ceaseless development didn’t appreciate her approach.

Nancy Shaver would ask tough questions and was often criticized, sometimes harshly, by her fellow Commissioners for doing so. You might recall one Commissioner getting angry and petulantly storming out of a Commission meeting four years ago after Shaver questioned three no-bid 450th Commemoration contracts. The animosity by that Commissioner persisted even until Nancy Shaver’s final meeting on February 25th.

It’s interesting to note that those contracts never did get audited. Shaver was the lone voice demanding accountability for over $3 million worth of expenditures for the 450th Commemoration.

There is no question that Mayor Shaver’s approach to issues sometimes led to tension, disagreement and, occasionally, “drama.” But it was drama born out of a strong belief that the interests of city residents deserved as much representation in the City Commission as those of developers, the tourism industry and the college. If her questions and push for transparency made others uncomfortable, then you might take that as validation of her approach. That some, like The Record, are now celebrating the anticipated lack of “drama” at City Commission meetings probably tells you more about where they stand on the question of protecting residential interests in this city and who’s paying their bills. Probably safe to conclude that less “drama” really means less “transparency,” and that’s the last thing residents of St Augustine should want.

As mentioned above, I don’t know Mayor Upchurch and sincerely wish him well. I hope he will not view his job as “going along to get along” or as just choir conductor for the Commission’s bi-monthly singing of Kumbaya. Because If Mayor Upchurch embraces the vision of city government endorsed by The Record then, at least until the next election, city residents will have no champion of transparency on the Commission and the opaqueness of city decision making will certainly increase. This will require city residents to become more engaged, more vigilant and more demanding of answers.

I truly hope Mayor Upchurch brings to the government, not only his impressive experience in public office, but a fierce independence and a willingness to ruffle a few feathers on behalf of the people who live in the City of St Augustine. If he does, let’s hope the new mayor receives better treatment from our local newspaper than did his predecessor.

St. Augustine commissioner supports change to mayor’s role. (SAR)

$
0
0


Seeking to eliminate "turbulence,""confusion" and "inefficiency," flatulent first-year freshman St. Augustine City Commissioner JOHN OTHA VALDES wants to eliminate voters' rights to elect their own mayor, also suggesting non-resident business and property owners be given the right to vote.    Valdes, 70, a third-generation Florida construction contractor, was fined a mere $224 by the Code Enforcement Board in 2016 after demolishing a Washington Street home after being denied a permit, after telling the building inspector, "I could make it fall down." 

After 1550 days of obstructing beloved reform Mayor Nancy Shaver, the bad-ole-boys want "their " town back.  Valdes moved to St. Augustine in 1992 after selling his Saudi Arabian construction firm to his Saudi and British partners.   Mayor Tracy Wilson Upchurch, "elected" by Commissioners March 4 (after Mayor Shaver resigned February 28 after suffering a stroke), without meaningful public comment, refused to allow public comment in response to Valdes' proposals,  refusing to call on two citizens who raised their hands.  

Conservative Upchurch,  former mayor, corporate lawyer scion and director and current Flager College history and law professor,  was the UF law school roommate of disgraced ex-Mayor Joseph Lester Boles, Jr., whom Shaver defeated in 2014.  Mayor Shaver was re-elected in 2016 and 2018 by landslides. 


Heroic Mayor Nancy Shaver did such a good job holding City Hall denizen-doormats for contractors and developers accountable that she was re-elected twice in landslides. Now the Establishment would like to alter or abolish the job of Mayor.


"Hypocrisy is the compliment that vice pays to virtue." -- Francois de La Rochefoucauld


Mayor Tracy Upchurch, a lawyer, refused to call on two citizens who raised their hands and wanted to respond. How gauche and louche. Violated First Amendment and F.S. 286. Uncouth, unkind, discourteous. Owners and controllers want "their" City back and loathed and undermined beloved reform Mayor Nancy Shaver for 1550 days, ending in her stroke and now want to abolish the job. Nasty other-directed puppets need to go.


NO RESPONSE to messages that I left for TRACY WILSON UPCHURCH and JOHN OTHA VALDES.


As William F. Buckley, Jr. once said, "Why does baloney reject the grinder?"






St. Augustine commissioner supports change to mayor’s role.
By Sheldon Gardner
Posted at 2:01 AM
April 4, 2019
St. Augustine Record

St. Augustine Commissioner John Valdes said it’s time for the city to talk about changing the role of mayor, including the possibility of eliminating the title.

Valdes made the comment Wednesday as commissioners met to kick off a comprehensive review of the city charter.

Having an elected mayor is confusing for some residents, especially those who come from places where mayors wield more power, Valdes said. He also said he views the title as a way to create a “power base that really doesn’t exist.”

The mayor controls Commission meetings and is the ceremonial face of the city, but the mayor has the same voting power as others on the Commission. The city manager handles the city’s daily operations and is responsible for implementing policies set by the Commission.

“You have a mayor’s seat that really amounts to running meetings and, (to) use the old adage, kissing babies. ... At the end of the day, sometimes having a mayor that puts on the cloak of a big-city mayor causes turbulence that wouldn’t necessarily be there,” Valdes said.

Valdes said he would prefer that the Commission have a chairperson and that the title rotate based on a “non-political” criteria, such as time in office.

The city charter sets the foundation for how the city operates, including rules for elections, the powers of the city, the governmental structure and powers and duties of city officials.

The city charter changed in 2006 to set the current manner of handling the mayor’s seat, which is a two-year term and an elected position. Other members of the Commission serve four-year terms.

If commissioners were to move forward with changing the mayor’s seat, the decision would go to city residents for a vote.


Other changes to the charter also require a referendum, including any change to form of government and terms of elected offices, City Clerk Darlene Galambos said. The city has until June 2020 to place items in a referendum, she said.

Some changes can be done by ordinance, Galambos said.

The city had a charter review in the ’80s, she said. There’s no city requirement for the charter to be reviewed.

Commissioners had mixed opinions about changing the role of mayor.

Vice Mayor Leanna Freeman said she would like commissioners to choose the mayor every year.

Commissioner Nancy Sikes-Kline said she had mixed opinions.

“Honestly, what I think concerns me the most about that suggestion is that (it) weights the power to the city manager and staff,” Sikes-Kline said. “I think it kind of takes away from the powers of the Commission, essentially.”


Valdes disagreed, saying there would still be five elected commissioners.


Mayor Tracy Upchurch said the change in charter of how the mayor’s seat is handled came after a previous Commission removed the mayor, which offended residents.

He said he would hate to see the title of mayor go away, and there’s value to having a mayor in a place like St. Augustine.

“My sense is that most people like the idea of electing the mayor,” he said.

Mayor Nancy Shaver, who resigned in February because of a stroke, had been accused of overstepping her authority.

Former Vice Mayor Todd Neville called out Shaver after she sent a letter, without Commission consent, asking the U.S. Army Corps to study the feasibility of closing the St. Augustine Inlet to help address flooding issues. She withdrew the request after getting pushback from commissioners.

Lopez said she plans to bring back research on possible policy changes and other points of the charter review as early as May.


Commissioner Roxanne Horvath was not at the meeting because of an illness, Upchurch said.

Other topics to be considered:

• Commissioners supported further discussing changing the residency requirements for City Commission candidates. Commissioners just have to be city residents to qualify.

Possibilities include requiring candidates to be residents for at least a year or loosening residency requirements so that someone could move to the city after being elected.

Valdes asked for information about whether the city can give voting power to people who own property in the city but don’t live in the city.

• Commissioners supported changing the time frame required to fill a vacancy on the Commission.

When Shaver resigned, commissioners had 10 days to fill the post or the decision would have gone to the governor. The city did not name candidates until the meeting where commissioners chose Upchurch as Shaver’s replacement.

Commissioners supported changing the deadline to 30 days, which will allow more time to provide information to the public.

• Lopez provided a document to the Commission before the meeting and reviewed it page-by-page on Wednesday. The document suggested many changes to the charter, including deleting redundant or obsolete rules or those preempted by state law, adding language that reflects current practices and adding female pronouns to the charter. The current charter, because of when it was written, uses male pronouns, Lopez said.

























April 5, 1999: Landmark Farver v. Carpenter jury verdict in Anderson County, Tenn. Circuit Court

$
0
0





On this day in 1999, 20 years ago, we won a landmark jury verdict in Sherrie Graham Farver v. Dr. Kenneth Carpenter, M.D. in Anderson County, Tenn. Circuit Court.

The Department of Energy's malfeasant psychiatrist called Sherrie "paranoid, delusional and psychotic" for raising environmental health concerns about K-25 plant cyanide exposures, ending her security clearance and career in radiation protection in Oak Ridge, Tenn. nuclear plants then operated by Lockheed Martin. Verdict upheld on appeal. DOE's unAmerican abuse of psychiatry to attack ethical employees was rightly condemned by twelve local jurors. Great day.

The Oak Ridge oligarchy of atomic blunderers was angry. Suspended 2004. Disbarred 2006. Hope to get LLM and get my license back one day. Currently a goverment watchdog in St. Augustine, Florida.

Contributions gratefully accepted. www.gofundme.com/edslavin

Here's the Farver v. Carpenter decision from the Tennessee Court of Appeals (tortfeasor was permission to appeal denied by Tennessee Supreme Court -- my brief in that Court was only one page long, inspired by reading about some Abraham Lincoln appellate briefs worthy of the name "brief"):  https://casetext.com/case/farver-v-carpenter

Ernest Frederick "Fritz" Hollings, R.I.P.

$
0
0
The gracious, witty, evolving progressive Senator "Fritz" Hollings had suzerainty over my first workplace, commencing as a volunteer on August 29, 1974.   After RFK died, Senator Hollings graciously and generously lent or donated one of his five Russell Senate Office Building suite rooms to Senator Ted Kennedy for his mailroom.  My nickname there was "Fast Eddie," for the speed with which I could walk to and from the Senate's three Capitol press galleries, read and sort mail, and other office for EMK

Senator Hollings was a stalwart defender of tort victims' rights against "tort deform" and the wealthy corporate tortfeasors' lobby.  When he last ran for re-election, in 1998, his republican opponent challenged him to take a drug test. Senator Hollings replied, "I'LL TAKE A DRUG TEST WHEN HE TAKES AN IQ TEST."

We shall miss him.



Ernest Hollings, 97, a South Carolina Senator Who Evolved, Is Dead

Senator Ernest F. Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina, in 1967. After touring poor areas of his state, he said in the Senate, “We’ve got work to do in our own backyard, just as anybody who’s candid knows he has work in his own backyard, and I’d rather clean it up than cover it up.”CreditHenry Griffin/Associated Press Photo
Image
Senator Ernest F. Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina, in 1967. After touring poor areas of his state, he said in the Senate, “We’ve got work to do in our own backyard, just as anybody who’s candid knows he has work in his own backyard, and I’d rather clean it up than cover it up.”CreditCreditHenry Griffin/Associated Press Photo
Ernest F. Hollings, a silver-haired South Carolina Democrat who served 38 years in the United States Senate in an era of rising prosperity and often painful accommodation to racial tolerance in his state and across the South, died on Saturday at his home in Isle of Palms, S.C. He was 97.
His former press secretary, Andy Brack, confirmed his death.
Like his colleague Strom Thurmond, South Carolina’s senior senator, Mr. Hollings became governor, ran for president and was a revered populist who took care of the military, business interests and the folks back home.
Together, they were the nation’s longest-serving Senate pair from one state. When Mr. Thurmond died in 2003 at 100, he had been the Senate’s longest-tenured member after 48 years in office. Moreover, Mr. Hollings was junior senator for 36 years, itself a record, and his tenure of 38 years and 55 days, including more than two years fulfilling the term of a senator who died in office, made him the eighth longest-serving senator.
Mr. Thurmond, a Democrat who switched to the Republican Party, never relented in his opposition to full equality for black Americans. Mr. Hollings, while remaining a fiscal conservative, evolved into a social moderate, riding winds of change that swept the South as proponents of civil rights won court cases, staged protests and endured brutalities that shocked the nation’s conscience.
ADVERTISEMENT
Having grown up in segregated Charleston, attended a segregated college and served in a segregated army, Mr. Hollings had little contact with poor black people and initially opposed civil rights legislation. Guided by N.A.A.C.P. officials, he toured poor black and white areas of his state in 1968 and 1969, and what he saw shocked him: rat-infested slums where families subsisted on grits and greens; children infected with worms, living in shacks without lights, heat or water; a mentally disabled mother of 10 who had never heard of food stamps.
“There is hunger in South Carolina,” a solemn Mr. Hollings told a Senate committee. “I know as a public servant I am late to the problem,” adding, “We’ve got work to do in our own backyard, just as anybody who’s candid knows he has work in his own backyard, and I’d rather clean it up than cover it up.”
Mr. Hollings, right, with Senator John McCain of Arizona during a hearing of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.CreditScott J. Ferrell/CQ Roll Call, via Getty Images
Image
Mr. Hollings, right, with Senator John McCain of Arizona during a hearing of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.CreditScott J. Ferrell/CQ Roll Call, via Getty Images
The News and Courier of Charleston reported, “Senators, members of the press corps and visitors packed in the hearing room watched and listened in disbelief as Hollings detailed dozens of tragically poignant scenes of human suffering in his state.”
Despite their differences, Mr. Hollings and Mr. Thurmond had a relatively good relationship, collaborating on legislation and projects to benefit education, employment, textiles, tourism and other industries and small businesses in South Carolina.
ADVERTISEMENT
Tall and trim, with a military bearing and a Charleston Tidewater drawl, Mr. Hollings, who was known as Fritz, began his career in 1949 as a state legislator and an orthodox segregationist, flying the Confederate battle flag, defending school segregation and denouncing the N.A.A.C.P. as subversive, illegal and “against our way of life in the South.”
But by 1963, ending his governorship, he accepted integration at Clemson University. “South Carolina is running out of courts,” he told state legislators. “This General Assembly must make clear South Carolina’s choice, a government of laws rather than a government of men. This should be done with dignity.” Weeks later, Harvey Gantt enrolled at Clemson without incident as its first black student.
By 1984, during a hopeless campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, he called himself a centrist, “strong on defense and liberal on social issues.” He built his campaign around a spending freeze but endorsed racial amity, the fight against poverty and a shift away from the Reagan administration’s use of military force and covert operations in Central America.
And by 2005, when he left the Senate, Mr. Hollings had established a long record of support for civil rights. He had also endorsed the Rev. Jesse Jackson for president in 1988, and had voted in 1991 to confirm Clarence Thomas as the second black justice of the Supreme Court.
Mr. Hollings with his wife, Patricia, and their children, Helen and Michael, in 1958 as they were preparing to move into the governor’s mansion in Columbia, S.C.CreditAssociated Press
Image
Mr. Hollings with his wife, Patricia, and their children, Helen and Michael, in 1958 as they were preparing to move into the governor’s mansion in Columbia, S.C.CreditAssociated Press
Reminded by Mike Wallace, in a 2004 interview on “60 Minutes” on CBS, that he had voted against the 1967 nomination of Thurgood Marshall as the first black Supreme Court justice, Mr. Hollings expressed regret, but offered an excuse. “I couldn’t get re-elected,” he said. “That’s the honest answer. If I had voted for him, I might as well withdraw from the race. It was political.”
Ernest Frederick Hollings was born in Charleston, S.C., on Jan. 1, 1922, to Adolph G. and Wilhelmine (Meyer) Hollings. His family of paper mill proprietors went bankrupt in the Depression. He attended public schools, but was raised in an affluent neighborhood now on the National Register of Historic Places. He graduated in 1942 from The Citadel, the military college in Charleston. In World War II, he was an Army artillery combat officer in North Africa, France and Germany and was discharged a captain in 1945.
Correction: 
An earlier version of a picture caption with this obituary referred incorrectly to the members of the Senate Commerce Committee shown in a 2002 photograph with Mr. Hollings. One of them, Peter Fitzgerald, is a Republican; they are not all Democrats.
Keith Schneider and Sarah Mervosh contributed reporting.

936.000 gallons of City of St Augustine sewage spills! -- "Florida reckons with ‘sewer crisis’" (GateHouse Florida)

$
0
0
Good reporting.  City and county officials need to be haled into court an questioned by environmental crimes prosecutors and grand juries at the state and federal level.





By Daphne Chen
GateHouse Florida

By Jennifer Borresen
Graphics Editor

By Josh Salman
GateHouse Media

Posted Apr 13, 2019 at 7:54 PM
Updated Apr 13, 2019 at 7:54 PM

More than 900,000 gallons of raw sewage flowed into Sarasota Bay after a violent December storm forced open a city pipe.

Summer rain in Daytona Beach and equipment failure in Jacksonville each prompted more than a quarter-million gallons of human waste to spill from sewers last year.

In Boca Raton, a pressurized pipe gushed out nearly 50,000 gallons of untreated wastewater, while another 55,000 gallons spewed from a DeFuniak Springs manhole into nearby Bruce Creek.

And in St. Augustine over about the past five years, the city has had sewage spills that total close to 936,000 gallons, with more than 780,000 gallons going into water, according to city documents.

These sewage spills are emblematic of failing wastewater systems across Florida, which is grappling with aging infrastructure and no clear solutions for funding a fix.

During the past decade, deteriorating sewers have released 1.6 billion gallons of wastewater, much of it polluting the state’s estuaries and oceans, according to a GateHouse Media analysis of state environmental data.

More than 370 million gallons of that was completely untreated.

Experts say the sewage has fed the blue-green algae blooms wreaking havoc on Florida estuaries and exacerbated red tide in the Gulf of Mexico. Amid historic growth, environmentalists fear it will only get worse.

LEARN MORE

Go to http://gatehousenews.com/sewers to see interactive features explaining the scope of Florida’s “sewer crisis.”

“We are at a point where sewers need to be replaced and have been for some time now,” said Glenn Compton, chairman of Manasota-88, an environmental advocacy organization in Southwest Florida. “Until the local governments make it a priority, we are going to continue seeing these spills. Something needs to be done.”

GateHouse Media obtained data on all sewage spills statewide since the start of 2009 from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

An analysis of those reported spills shows Florida’s sewers failed nearly 23,000 times over the past 10 years — a clip of more than six sewer spills each day.

The systems leaked enough human waste to fill about 2,400 Olympic-size swimming pools.

The top cause for the spills was breakage, often from tree root intrusion and exacerbated by the deterioration of aging lines, nearing 80 years old in some communities. Flooding and power loss from storms also pounded the systems in coastal areas, causing massive amounts of sewage to flow out.

Households contributed by rinsing fats such as bacon grease down the sink and flushing baby wipes, which can clog pipes and force ruptures — like the one that pushed 80,000 gallons of untreated wastewater into Bradenton’s Wares Creek in January.

Utility officials recognize the problem but say their hands are tied. They’re trying to extend the life of sewers with patchwork repairs. That’s because it could require hundreds of billions of dollars to bring the state’s older infrastructure up to modern standards, experts estimate.


“It’s really hard to get ahead of it,” said Bill Riebe, utilities director for the City of Sarasota. “It’s better to invest early, so you’re not in that fire drill. But it’s a monumental task.”

“It boils down to money,” he said. “The pipe is all underground, so it’s out of sight, out of mind. Nobody bothers with utilities until they don’t work.”

‘Very expensive to replace’

Most sewers in Florida use gravity to usher waste from homes and businesses to neighborhood lift stations, where it is stored and pumped into pressurized mains, which then take the sewage to the treatment plant.

Municipalities have hundreds of miles of these sewer lines buried beneath ground.

When Florida first introduced sewers, it was common for the pipes to be made from baked clay. Cast iron later became the standard and now it’s mostly PVC plastic.

But many systems throughout the state are still using those older lines — leaving them more susceptible to damage.


Human wastewater contains hazardous hydrogen sulfide, created by the human body during food digestion and responsible for the odor from decay. Hydrogen sulfide can be highly corrosive, eating away at sewer pipes over time. Depending on when a municipality was developed, many of these sewers are now flirting with their 75-year lifespan.

“We really have a sewer crisis in the state of Florida,” said Lisa Rinaman, the St. Johns Riverkeeper. “There’s an extreme need to have a comprehensive, holistic discussion. When you have a state growing like Florida, this isn’t going to get any better if we’re not dealing with it comprehensively.”

It’s not a problem unique to Florida. The nation’s wastewater infrastructure was rated as a D+ on a report card from the American Society of Civil Engineers. Florida was given a C.

“The infrastructure is getting older, it’s very expensive to replace and people don’t think about it, or don’t want to pay a bigger sewer bill,” said Rebecca Shelton, a member of ASCE’s Committee on America’s Infrastructure who worked on the wastewater report card. “There’s still a long ways to go.”

In a state surrounded by salt water, the consequences magnify.

Some 980 million gallons of wastewater from reported spills have entered Florida waterways during the past decade alone. That includes about 220 million gallons of raw sewage, according to DEP data.

The blue-green algae blooms that have become commonplace in areas including Palm Beach, Stuart and Lake Okeechobee feed directly off the nutrients in this wastewater, utility officials told GateHouse Media.


And although scientists want to see more research on the impacts to naturally-occurring red tide, most experts agree that human fecal matter can potentially exacerbate the spread.

“If you think about what’s in the wastewater, much of it contains nitrogen and phosphate — two of the driving forces behind the formation and proliferation of algae blooms,” said Jerry Phillips, a former attorney with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, who worked on cases involving wastewater violations. “And when the nutrients meet red tide, it just explodes.”

‘A lot of old pipes’

Aside from age, sewers also take a beating from Florida’s storms.

When power goes out during heavy rain, lift stations without a generator will shut down. People are still flushing their toilets, but that water is not pumped into the main lines. Instead, it backs up and overflows at the lift station — usually through the manhole cover.

Rain also finds its way into sewage pipes, overwhelming the systems with more volume than the lines can handle. It’s called infiltration and inflow — and it can produce massive sewage leaks during hurricanes, like 2017′s Irma, which pounded the state’s west coast and forced a massive evacuation.

During Hurricane Irma, floodwaters damaged parts of St. Johns County and sewage flowed from St. Augustine’s wastewater system into nearby water bodies. The spills, which mostly came from power failures, released about 388,116 gallons of sewage from the wastewater system, according to city records. Of that, the city estimates about 380,416 gallons went into waterways include the San Sebastian River, the Matanzas River, Quarry Creek and Hospital Creek.

Storms even contribute to pollution from reclaimed water — treated wastewater used for things like irrigation — when rain forces the storage tanks to overflow. Although reclaimed water is less harmful than raw sewage, it can still contain toxins.

The Department of Environmental Protection says it tries to focus on outreach before a storm to ensure utilities are prepared. The agency also will levy fines for wastewater violations.

“The Department’s focus is working with facilities on the front end so services are restored as soon as possible, and in the case of wastewater facilities, to ensure spills are prevented,” a DEP spokesman wrote in an email statement.

Since 2009, rain and power losses produced unpermitted releases totaling nearly 1 billion gallons of wastewater.

Nowhere was harder hit than the Tampa Bay region.

The DEP’s Southwest regulatory district — which includes seven counties from Manatee up to Citrus and east to Polk — was responsible for 56 percent of the total sewage spilled during the past decade.

That’s nearly 10 times more wastewater than was spilled in the Southeast district — comprising Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and the entire Treasure Coast, records show.

Environmentalists point to a lack of proper maintenance and an unwillingness from local governments to spend money to replace aging sewer lines.

“Maintaining a sewage infrastructure is one of the government’s basic requirements,” said Justin Bloom, executive director of the Suncoast Waterkeeper, which litigated St. Petersburg and Gulfport over sewer issues. “What’s happened over the past few decades, the municipalities have let their sewage infrastructure deteriorate.”

Last year, Fort Lauderdale officials approved a plan to borrow $200 million to fix the city’s failing sewage systems.

The City of Sarasota spends about $14 million a year for basic sewer maintenance, with $64 million in capital improvement projects on the books related to wastewater. In Sarasota alone, the utility director estimates it would cost up to $4 billion to replace the entire wastewater and utilities system.

Across the state, it could be hundreds of billions.

But the longer municipalities wait, the more the cost will add up, while the environmental toll mounts, said Sen. Joe Gruters, R-Sarasota, who sponsored legislation under consideration this session that would fine utilities up to $2 per gallon of sewage spilled.

“I just could not believe the massive amount of damage we’re doing,” Gruters said. “We have a lot of infrastructure issues in this state — and a lot of old pipes — but it’s unacceptable.

“We are failing our state.”

St. Augustine Record reporter Sheldon Gardner contributed to this report.

Viewing all 6438 articles
Browse latest View live