Quantcast
Channel: Clean Up City of St. Augustine, Florida
Viewing all 6454 articles
Browse latest View live

Don't let developers steal our County pier and park --- "St. Augustine Beach’s possible takeover of county’s Pier Park still in the air; farmers market in limbo" (SAR)

$
0
0
Blurred ethical lines on St. Johns County Ocean and Fishing Pier.  Watch the ancien regime lie, cheat and try to use flummery to help developers steal our park and pier.  Just say no.  The pier was constructed with a special tax voted in a 1982 referendum.  The property is not for sale.

Enough corruption.

No more secretive collusion with the Ardids and Key International on any void-for-vagueness "Private/Public Partnership" (sic), subject of 2014 and 2017 meetings between maladroit St. Augustine Beach City Manager BRUCE MAX ROYLE, other-directed St. Johns County Administrator MICHAEL DAVID WANCHICK, and two successive Mayors of St. Augustine Beach, ANDREA SAMUELS and RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN.




Posted December 22, 2017 05:35 am - Updated December 22, 2017 05:44 am
By JAKE MARTIN jake.martin@staugustine.com
St. Augustine Beach’s possible takeover of county’s Pier Park still in the air; farmers market in limbo



CHRISTINA.KELSO@STAUGUSTINE.COM People walk to the beach from the packed St. Johns County Pier parking lot on June 29. The city of St. Augustine Beach is considering taking ownership of the lot and other parts of the property from the county.

PETER.WILLOTT@STAUGUSTINE.COM A man on a standup paddleboard travels under the St. Johns County Ocean and Fishing Pier in St. Augustine Beach on Thursday.


St. Johns County is looking to rid itself of the pier parking lot and its surroundings, minus the pier itself and the gift shop. The city of St. Augustine Beach has expressed interest in the property, but has yet to make a decision.

County Administrator Michael Wanchick says the parking lot will remain a parking lot either way and it will need to become a paid lot, without exemptions for retirees or residents, in order to remain sustainable for either government to manage and maintain.

“We’ve got to start minimizing or curtailing our losses and increasing our revenues,” he said at Tuesday’s commission meeting. “We’ve got to bring this in for a landing one way or another.”

Wanchick said the county’s Beach Services is losing $1 million a year and that $50,000 of that deficit is coming off the parking lot.

The county’s Parks and Recreation has already curtailed events sponsored by the county in Pier Park, and Wanchick said he’d like to do the same with the farmers market and other events “because it’s a parking lot.” He said the county also wants to implement an off-beach parking fee to recoup the costs of maintaining the property, but this consideration has been put on hold until the ownership question is resolved.

He said while there’s a “revenue component” to the county’s concerns, there’s also a plain lack of parking.

Wanchick said the county fields phone calls and emails “on a regular basis” about why the lot is used for special events, such as the Wednesday farmers market, and called it a “legitimate question.” He said he and staff are also concerned with the variances the city has allowed new development in the area around the pier with regard to parking and the effect that will have on the facility.

Additionally, Wanchick said the county deals with ADA complaints and other citizen complaints regarding the operation of the market by the St. Augustine Beach Civic Association, which has a long-standing contract with the county to manage the market and use the facility free of cost. He said the county’s legal office estimates it has put in $6,000 of staff time “just to manage” these complaints, and that does not include his time or that of County Attorney Patrick McCormack, or that of Beach Services.

Bill Jones, president of the Civic Association, told The Record on Thursday the county doesn’t give the Civic Association anything it wouldn’t give other non-profits running a farmers market. He said there have been other such markets elsewhere in the county that did not last as long as the one at the pier has and that didn’t pay rent to the county. He said the complaints are “bogus” and come entirely from a small group of individuals with a gripe against him and his organization.

Jones said he doesn’t know where else the market would be successful but the pier. But that doesn’t seem to align with the county’s vision.

Wanchick outlined two scenarios for commissioners.

Scenario One: The county retains ownership of the property, removes events from the parking lot and turns it back into a full-time parking lot, but with fees. He said the changes shouldn’t affect the Concerts by the Sea, which take place at the pavilion at Pier Park. He said the farmers market could be relocated to the St. Augustine Amphitheatre or elsewhere.

Scenario Two: The county gives the property to the city with the condition the parking lot remains a parking lot “and then they can operationalize it anyway they want, and they can deal with the ADA complaints and other complaints that have been coming in.”

“It’s become a very black and white issue,” he added.

Commissioner Paul Waldron said he doesn’t want to give the property away to St. Augustine Beach, which he said has had “ample time” to look at the logistics. He questioned what happens if the city takes it over, fails to do upkeep or can no longer maintain it and the property ends up back in the county’s hands in disrepair.

He said there are public-private partnerships the county can pursue. He also said the county should put out its own request for proposals for the Wednesday farmers market to be held in a new location, such as the Amphitheatre.

“If it’s the same group, so be it, but they have to pay,” Waldron said. “If there’s a complaint, they’re liable.”

Commission Chair Henry Dean expressed interest in conveying the property to the city because the farmers market has become “sort of an iconic figure” to the area’s residents and visitors. He said vendors rely on that market for a portion of their living expenses. He defended the location of the market due to its “unique” setting, overlooking the ocean, but also acknowledged parking is at a premium.

Dean said he was confident the city would take good care of the property under the conditions and restrictions to be set by the county. He said the city has told him and Wanchick it will try to come up with a way to make a public-private partnership happen or find another solution.

“We’ll have our hands full with the county pier,” Dean told fellow commissioners. “This doesn’t even address the pier issues.”

Estimates for rebuilding the aging pier are between $10 million and $14 million. Officials from both governments have said their agencies don’t have the money on their own to build a pier.

The future of the pier and parking lot were discussed about six months ago at a joint meeting between the two governments. The city continues to ask for more time to consider the potential conveyance of the Pier Park property.

At the Dec. 5 meeting of the St. Augustine Beach Commission, City Manager Max Royle said he and his staff would be crunching the numbers on costs of managing and maintaining the volleyball courts, pavilion, and parking lot. He said the intent would be to keep the area “as it is today.”

“We can’t afford to do striping and painting, and landscaping and all that,” he said.

Royle said the city has to determine what it would charge the people using those facilities in order to recoup the costs and build up a reserve for larger capital expenses later on. Beach commissioners touched on the possibilities of charging for parking, reserving the volleyball courts or using the pavilion for special events.

Meanwhile, the Wednesday farmers market is in a kind of limbo.

County commissioners on Tuesday unanimously voted to once again extend the county’s contract with the Civic Association to continue managing the market, but they added a $500 weekly fee in order to recoup costs. The extension is for two months, from the end of January to the end of March.

During this time, the county is hoping the city will come back with a decision on how it would like to proceed. Wanchick said if the city wants to take over the property, it can then continue with the Civic Association or put out its own request for proposals for management of the market.

Commissioner Jeb Smith said there’s a cost that needs to be recouped, but he wanted to be sure they’re working with a “legitimate cost.” Dean expressed some concern about negotiating a two-month agreement with fees, predicting the county would face a bit of “headwind” with the Civic Association over the holidays.

Commissioner Jimmy Johns said he could understand maybe 15 years ago the parking lot may not have been used to the extent it is today, hence the long-standing contract with no fees going back to the county. However, he said the county now needs to be breaking even on its quality-of-life assets.

Commissioner Jay Morris said breaking even, at least in the private sector, means you’re dead in the water before you know it.

“I would charge a minimum $500 a week, which I think is going to shock the hell out of them,” he said. “It’s been a free ride and then, just for two months, to do that … But I’m all in favor of that.”

Morris said he doesn’t think the city will ultimately take the property. He said either way he agrees with Wanchick’s assessment that parking fees are coming.

Jones said in a letter Wednesday to Dean and fellow commissioners his organization was “grateful” for the extension, but concerned about the quick math that led to the $500-a-week figure, down from “what appeared to be a very arbitrary number of $1,000 a week, which is 100 percent plus of our gross weekly revenue.”

“After some discussion, the final number ended up being 50 percent of our total gross revenue,” Jones continued. “This number is unreasonable when compared to the 30 percent figure charged to the operators of the Saturday market.”

He also took issue with his non-profit being charged a higher percentage than the for-profit running the Saturday market.

“If we had been aware this item was going to be discussed, we could have made the Commissioners aware of this discrepancy,” Jones wrote, requesting the item be revisited in January.

Wanchick had clarified to commissioners prior to the vote the Civic Association’s use of the parking lot was not fully responsible for the $50,000-a-year deficit in maintaining it. He said “only a portion” of that could be attributable to the farmers market, but didn’t provide an estimate.

The item was not advertised prior to Tuesday’s meeting, but was instead tacked onto the end of the agenda at Wanchick’s request at the head of the meeting. Additionally, no public comment was invited, although this was toward the end of a lengthy meeting, and it is unclear whether any members of the public were even in attendance.

Jones told The Record he felt the market has become a “political football” in the back and forth between the county and the city.

He said the Civic Association approached the county with an offer to help provide paved parking for as many as 65 vehicles along a public easement on Pope Road, but never heard back. Instead, within the last couple months, “No Parking” signs went up.




 Comments
k
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

1. Vote possibly illegal and invalid under F.S. 286.0144. Not advertised. No public comment. Civic Association could sue and win injunctive relief and attorney fees, but statute does not allow it to overturn vote. Thanks to Jake Martin for another thorough article. Watch the 12/2017 Commission meeting video (additional item 2) for a 47 minute discussion, showing that Commissioners listened to longstanding public concerns (while getting insufficient legal advice from County Attorney Patrick McCormack on 286.0144 compliance).
2. The Salt Life Food Shack restaurant and Embassy Suites Hotel got SAB city zoning variances for insufficient parking, County Commissioners noted Tuesday. Free parking subsidizes those crafty businesses. SAB's inept City management crated the parking problem at the pier and park.
3. The wealthy absentee landowners of the excessively large Embassy Suites Hotel, Key International, Inc. of Miami -- controlled by Messrs. Jose, Diego and Inigo Ardid and represented by Akerman Senterfitt law firm managing partner Niesen Kasdkin (former Miami Beach Mayor) -- have had secret meetings with County and City, first with Mayor Andrew Samuels and County Administrator Wanchick about the pier and park, and most recently with Mayor Richard Burtt O'Brien. This secrecy stinks on ice, on growth hormones. In the words of Daniel Patrick Moynihan, "Secrecy is for losers." We have a Right to Know. Don't steal our pier and park.
4. Commissioner James K. Johns was right. Letting SABCA have free use of the parking lot for events was a $50,000 plus subsidy from taxpayers, for years. But where is the data on alleged complaints? I want to read it.
5. The St. Augustine Beach Civic Association is a wolf in sheep's clothing, bossed by St. Johns County Sheriff's Office Civil Process Supervisor William Jones, an angry man against whom several internal affairs complaints have been sustained on material falsehoods to supervisors and SABPD. SABCA President William Jones, and EVP Robert Samuels have attacked, defamed and smeared concerned citizens questioning SABCA, including City Mayor-elect Undine George and former Mayor Edward George. In addition to unaudited profits from a dodgy PAC/501c4, other unanswered questions involve Tourist Development Council subsidy of Concerts by the Sea, alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, intimidation, harassment and arrests of persons engaged in First Amendment protected activity, and use of SABCA as a recruiting ground for pro-developer policies and candidates. In 2015, SABCA made a $500 contribution to a PAC supporting developers' successful campaign in a special one-issue election to raise sales taxes for schools, instead of raising impact fees. (Investment of $189,000 resulted in avoiding $150,000,000 in impact fees and taxes, or a Return on Investment of 33,200%!) Past City and County Commissioners have neglected their fiduciary duties with fawning obeisance and no-bid, unfair, free or $1/year use of government property by bully SJSO supervisor William Jones' SABCA group.
6. Keep asking questions. Demand answers. Expect democracy. It takes a village. We are working to root out corruption, waste, fraud, abuse, flummery, dupery and nincompoopery. Yes we can!
7. Thanks to Mayor-elect Undine George, Commissioner Maggie Kostka, Tom Reynolds, Rosetta Bailey, Merrill Roland et al.
LikeReply1m
Tom Reynolds · 

THIS GIVING AWAY A $5,000,000.00, (THAT'S RIGHT 5 MILLION DOLLARS) PIECE OF COUNTY PROPERTY TO ST AUGUSTINE BEACH IS CRAZY, DERELICTION, and FULL BLOWN STUPID on STERIODS!

WTF .........( WHAT THE FOOLISHNESS)!

IT SHOULD BE CLEAR TO THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THAT THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CAN'T MANAGE ANYTHING PERIOD!

IT'S-A PARKING LOT MIKE E ....... SWEEP, STRIPE, CUT A LITTLE GRASS, and THAT'S IT! IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE PAVED NOW AND WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAVED FOR MANY MANY YEARS!

SARQUOTE:
“We can’t afford to do striping and painting, and landscaping and all that,” he said....See More
LikeReply14hEdited
Richard Mathews
Pay toilets coming soon to the city?
LikeReply14h
Eve Slaven
{ 18 } - YEARS the St. Augustine Beach UnCivic
ASSociation has NOT Paid 1 Penny in RENT, ELECTRIC, WATER, BATHROOMS, TRASH REMOVAL, CLEAN UP of the Parking Lot, POLICE Directing Traffic for (4) Hours Every WEDNESDAY on A1A -( 52 ) WEEKS a YEAR.
70~ 90 Vendors . 50 % of them from OUT of OUR
County. NO RETUN to St. John’s County.UNLICENSED and PAYING NO TAXES !
FOOD VENDORS without FOOD HANDLERS
HEALTH CERTIFICATES, Eew / YUK !.
Abusing the HANDICAP by BLOCKING HANDICAP PARKING to Allow Unlicensed Food Vendor to Sell CORNDOGS!.
SABCA BOARD of DIRECTORS *** REFUSAL***
to OPEN THEIR FINANCIAL BO...See More
LikeReply2h
Jack Tigman
Why were the parking lots OK as free parking for all these years, until now? Municipal spending creep is a huge issue, everywhere. Spend, spend, spend, bulk up more and more obligations... Then, when the economic winds blow and there's some shift in property tax revenue, they scramble to monetize municipal services that were formerly free to justify an absurd spending regime and hope nobody bothers to notice the root cause. It's not the parking lot that's unsustainable. It's a spending budget that's making them believe people can't park a car without paying money to some stupid municipal office.

MEDIOCRITY LOVES COMPANY?: DONALD TRUMP ENDORSES REP. RONALD DEON DESANTIS (R-FL6/KOCH INDUSTRIES) FOR FLORIDA GOVERNOR -- BEFORE HE EVEN ANNOUNCES!

$
0
0

Donald Trump endorsement shakes up Florida governor’s race
Anthony Man
Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel
December 22, 2017 5:05 PM


As he arrived in South Florida on Friday, President Donald Trump shook up the 2018 Florida governor’s race by heaping praise on one of the Republicans who wants the job, Congressman Ron DeSantis.

Trump delivered the early Christmas present to DeSantis via his favorite communications medium: Twitter.

“Congressman Ron DeSantis is a brilliant young leader, Yale and then Harvard Law, who would make a GREAT Governor of Florida. He loves our Country and is a true FIGHTER!” the president wrote as he landed at Palm Beach International Airport.

Trump might have gotten some inspiration for his tweet from his second favorite form of communication: Fox News.

A report from the pool of reporters traveling to PBIA with Trump on Air Force One said that Fox News was playing on the cabin televisions. Toward the end of the flight, a segment with DeSantis was featured.

Trump arrives for Mar-a-Lago holiday visit
The president is spending the coming days at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, which the Trump administration calls the Winter White House.

DeSantis, who hasn’t officially announced his candidacy, thanked Trump in a press release with the headline, “President Trump Backs Ron DeSantis for Governor of Florida.”

“I’m grateful to have the president’s support and appreciate what he has done,” DeSantis said, adding praise for Trump achievements that have pleased conservatives: recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, signing the tax reform legislation, and appointing conservative judges.

DeSantis, a Republican from Ponte Vedra Beach, has been a strong supporter of Trump.

In August, he proposed cutting off funding for special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election.


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
Congressman Ron DeSantis is a brilliant young leader, Yale and then Harvard Law, who would make a GREAT Governor of Florida. He loves our Country and is a true FIGHTER!
1:40 PM - Dec 22, 2017
8,781 8,781 Replies 11,329 11,329 Retweets 48,684 48,684 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
DeSantis’ proposal, which went nowhere, would have stopped money for the investigation 180 days after it becomes law. And it would have prevented Mueller from investigating “matters” that occurred before Trump announced his presidential campaign.

Also in August, DeSantis used an appearance at the Palm Beach County Republican Party’s annual lobsterfest to advertise his pro-Trump credentials.

As he delivered a combination political speech and invocation, the big screens at the front of the room flashed a picture of DeSantis, his wife, their infant daughter, the president and First Lady Melania Trump outside the White House.

DeSantis said the president complimented his wife on her appearance.

At that Palm Beach County appearance, and at events throughout the state, DeSantis has been laying the groundwork for a 2018 candidacy for the Republican nomination to run for governor.

He’s known for railing against big government and Democrats, and is one of the most conservative members of the House.

No distancing from Donald Trump
U.S. Rep. Ron DeSantis of Ponte Vedra Beach, a possible candidate for governor who said a formal announcement about his 2018 plans is a “couple of months” away, saw political advantage in advertising his pro-President Donald Trump credentials at the Palm Beach County Republican Party’s lobsterfest in Boca Raton on Aug. 17, 2017.

When DeSantis delivered a combination political speech and invocation, the big screens at the front of the room flashed a picture of DeSantis, his wife, their infant daughter, the president and the first lady outside the White House during what he said was a recent visit.

He said the president complimented his wife on her appearance. (Anthony Man)
DeSantis made no secret that his political ambitions are higher than Congress.

He was running for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in 2016, but his plans were derailed when U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., lost the presidential nomination — to Trump — and decided to run for re-election.

DeSantis got out of Rubio’s way and ran for re-election to his congressional seat.

Steve Schale, a prominent Florida Democratic strategist, said on Twitter that a Trump endorsement doesn’t guarantee success. Several of candidates the president has endorsed recently in statewide primary and general election contests have gone on to defeat.

“Based on Trump recent success in picking candidates, this might be the kiss of death. Though given Trump's incredibly thin skin & long memory, it's not surprising,” Schale wrote on Twitter.

'We need to save the country,' conservative U.S. Senate candidate tells Broward activists
Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam, a former member of Congress, also is seeking the Republican nomination in 2018.

Richard Corcoran, speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, is expected to run, but like DeSantis, hasn’t announced his candidacy.

A fourth Republican, state Sen. Jack Latvala, is a candidate. But he’s announced his resignation from the Legislature over a sexual harassment scandal that may have involved trading sex for official legislative action.





Rising seas: Coastal waters threaten Florida’s historic resources (SAR/GateHouse Florida)

$
0
0
Enacting the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore will help us get the resources to preserve and protect St. Augustine's history and nature forever.



















Posted December 23, 2017 06:13 am
By Dinah Voyles Pulver & Dale White
Rising seas: Coastal waters threaten Florida’s historic resources


The Castillo de San Marcos withstood two sieges in 330 years and changed hands five times, but its latest invader — the rising Atlantic Ocean — threatens to erode the historic St. Augustine fortress.


The coquina shell walls of the oldest masonry fort in the United States once absorbed cannonballs but is susceptible to the buffetings of the sea.

On the other side of the state, Egmont Key, elevation 6 feet, was named one of the state’s 11 most endangered places this year by the Florida Trust for Historic Preservation because rising seas threaten to submerge the island. Just outside Tampa Bay in the Gulf of Mexico, the island holds sacred significance for the Seminole Tribe of Florida. It also contains the ruins of another Spanish-American era fort.

“It’s the first project that we’ve placed on our annual endangered list because it’s endangered by sea level rise,” said Clay Henderson, trust president earlier this year when the key was added to the list.

Like the St. Augustine fort and Egmont Key, thousands of Florida’s heritage sites are vulnerable to rising seas, said Henderson, executive director of Stetson University’s Institute for Water and Environmental Resilience. “Jupiter Lighthouse, Fort Zachary Taylor in Key West, Fort Jefferson and Fort Pickens in Pensacola — all of these places are threatened.”

“When you look at St. Augustine, the oldest city in existence in our country, and it’s flooded twice in the last year, these are real threats,” he said. “They’re no longer academic and off in the future. They’re in real time.”

Growing concerns

Similar concerns are growing across the state and country as experts begin to assess what could be damaged or lost and how soon that could happen. In some places, damage already is occurring.

Federal scientists say seas in parts of Florida have risen about a third of an inch a year over the past decade. Mid-range forecasts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration indicate seas could rise anywhere from 13 to 39 inches in Florida by 2070 and as much as 72 inches by 2100.

Native American burial mounds, antebellum mansions, cemeteries, cracker-era cabins and even more-contemporary but unique-to-Florida architecture could be submerged if they’re not somehow salvaged.

Not everything will be saved, said Lorrie Muldowney, a trust board member and former head of Sarasota County’s Historical Resources Department. “We’ll have to make choices.”

Efforts to save heritage sites will compete for attention and money with the scramble to shore up roads, utilities and neighborhoods against the rising water.

A team of scientists led by David Anderson with the University of Tennessee recently analyzed an index of thousands of archaeological and historic sites across the Southeastern U.S. They concluded roughly 3.3 feet of sea level rise could submerge 19,676 archaeological sites in the region.

It would result in the loss of a substantial portion of the “historic period of human habitation of the coastal margin in the Southeastern United States,” concluded the study, published in late November in the journal PLOS One.

The study’s authors, also from Northern Kentucky and Indiana universities, added that many resources, including Native American sites, might be missing from the Digital Index of North American Archaeology.

If, or when, the higher-end predictions for sea-level rise materialize, the number of resources and historical sites threatened rises exponentially. Florida — low, flat and surrounded by water — stands to see the biggest losses.

Neither the state nor the federal government could provide a specific list of Florida’s most threatened historical resources. But the Trust for Historic Preservation cites a 2013 state study that estimated 16,015 historical resources in Florida could be affected by a 39-inch rise in sea level. That number would rise to nearly 35,000 with a six-foot rise in sea level, the Trust stated.

The realization of the magnitude of resources at risk has gotten the attention of the archaeological and historic preservation communities. State and national conferences the past three years have compared challenges and strategies, exploring measures such as living shorelines, sea walls, elevation and relocation. Professionals and volunteers interested in archaeology and historic preservation have launched a comprehensive effort to document and monitor the expected impacts to known historic sites in Florida.

But while the experts say they’ve seen interest increase exponentially, action plans and solutions aren’t materializing as quickly.

The Florida Public Archaeology Network is focusing on building partnerships with land management agencies around the state and hopes to work with cities and counties to document historical resources, said Della Scott-Ireton, associate director of the network. But at this point, she said, “there are a lot of people with their heads in the sand, even as coastal sites already are eroding.”

“It’s mind-boggling to me,” said Scott-Ireton. “It’s not about belief. It’s happening.”

Coastal and riverfront communities in Jacksonville have seen incremental sea level rise since the 1920s, said Adrienne Burke, executive director of Riverside Avondale, a Jacksonville nonprofit dedicated to preserving one of the state’s largest historic districts. Recent studies have shown sea level has risen faster over the past decade.

“Any additional sea level rise exacerbates flooding and storm surge,” she said. “It’s something we need to be having discussions about and getting people prepared and asking questions about what that means for our neighborhoods.”

It will have economic, environmental and social impacts, she said. “I feel like at this point there are more questions than answers.”

So far, the chief strategy seems to be “abandonment in place,” said Sarah Miller, northeast/east Central Florida regional director for the Archaeology Network. She’s based at Flagler College in St. Augustine, one of the network’s eight locations around the state.

Location, location, location

Many of Florida’s resources are vulnerable because the state’s cultural and architectural history is so closely associated with its seas, bays, rivers and other waterways.

Prehistoric tribes, European explorers, plantation owners and territory-staking pioneers settled near the shores. They fished the estuaries and traveled by dugout canoes, sailboats or steamships, relying on waterways as their highways long before roads and railways traversed the peninsula.

“If we think back, historically, those waterways would have been routes of communication and resource-rich places that would have made a lot of sense to have population close to them,” said Paul Backhouse, tribal historic preservation officer for the Seminole Tribe of Florida and director of its Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum.

“Even today, our densest populations are close to coastlines, and it was no different in the past with Native American society,” Backhouse said.

Two years ago, in a downtown Pensacola neighborhood, local historians and archaeologists uncovered evidence confirming the remains of the oldest multi-year European settlement in the U.S. Don Tristan de Luna founded the Spanish colony in 1559, six years before St. Augustine was established. The ill-fated settlement was hit by a hurricane a month into its existence, sinking its six ships just five weeks after the 1,500 settlers arrived. The settlement survived only two years.

Now, as sea levels continue inching higher, historians wonder what damage future hurricanes could wreak on other historical resources. Already the experts say they see increased damage from higher tides with passing storms and seasonal high tides.

And there’s more. The projected number of at-risk historic sites mentioned in the various studies doesn’t factor in storm surge, said Sara Ayers-Rigsby, a Florida Public Archaeology Network director at Florida Atlantic University.

Surging seas

When Hurricane Matthew and Hurricane Irma struck within 11 months of each other in 2016 and 2017, seawater surged into St. Augustine, up to the lighthouse on Egmont Key, and impacted other historic properties around the state.

Matthew was a wake-up call for many Floridians, but especially in St. Augustine, said Leslee Keys, director of historic preservation and special initiatives at Flagler College. Water swirled up through the breezeways in the Hotel Ponce de Leon.

When Irma arrived 11 months later, folks in historic downtown St. Augustine were ready, Keys said, rigging handmade door dams to help keep the water out.

South of St. Augustine, Fort Matanzas has been closed for much of the past 16 months. The fort itself is undamaged, but storm surge from the two hurricanes, Matthew and Irma, heavily damaged the ferry docks where boats take visitors to the tiny, historic fort on Rattlesnake Island.

Surge impacts also have been seen at Fort Pickens on the northern Gulf coast and the nearby Gulf Island National Seashore. The seashore includes remains of a Native American site, a Civil War battlefield and the Persidio Isla De Santa Rosa, a Spanish settlement built in the Pensacola area after the area was recaptured from the French. The settlement existed from about 1722 to 1750.

Despite already being submerged, the state’s many shipwrecks also are vulnerable.

“We think because they are already submerged we don’t have to worry about that,” said Miller. But rising water temperatures and increases in salinity caused by rising seas could expedite deterioration of the sunken vessels, she said. For archaeologists checking on wrecks, “no-compression dives will become compression dives.”

Three shipwrecks identified as belonging to the de Luna party were recovered in 1992, but changes in salinity or turbulence can impact the ships. After Hurricane Matthew, Ayers-Rigsby said archaeologists discovered that a shipwreck near St. Augustine shifted about 1,000 feet.

Aside from storm surges, nuisance flooding from higher-than-normal tides or heavy rainfall is occurring more often, Keys said. In St. Augustine, the city is working “very hard to try to repair the storm drains,” she said, and talking about adding a resiliency action plan to its historic preservation plan.

Cemeteries may prove to be an especially heartbreaking challenge for historians. At least 630 historic cemeteries are in perilous locations, threatened by increasing storm surges.

Some cemeteries possibly could be salvaged, Keys said. She participated in a Kentucky project to relocate a Revolutionary War-era graveyard and another from the post-Civil War period to make space for new highways. The wooden coffins had deteriorated and could not be moved, she said. “We took the bones out and re-interred them.”

‘Hard truths’

With the encroaching water threatening billions of dollars of infrastructure and thousands of homes, historic preservation experts know challenging decisions will be made in the years to come.

It will require facing “some hard truths,” said Linda Stevenson of Bradenton, a preservation architect whose projects have included circus magnate John Ringling’s home in Sarasota (Ca’ d’Zan) and the historic train depot in Venice. “We have to figure out how to best invest our resources.”

Resiliency is an important part of the conversation, said Burke of Riverside Avondale, but the fixes are going to get “really complicated” given the long-held standards and regulations used by the historic preservation community for grant eligibility and historic integrity. For example, elevating a structure to make it more resilient changes its historical integrity and its relationships to the buildings around it, she said. But the alternative might be losing the building entirely.

“There’s a lot of debate around that in the historic preservation world right now,” she said. Some communities have built an entire economy around their historic districts, she said. If those districts start changing, will tourists still visit?

At Canaveral National Seashore, a barrier island along the scenic Mosquito Lagoon, the park is working with Linda Walters of the University of Central Florida on shoreline restoration efforts, said Kristen Kneifl, resource management specialist. The park also works with its Southeast Archaeological Center, she said, to study and document prehistoric Native American middens such as Turtle Mound and Castle Windy, as well as other historic sites, and develop methods of protection.

The Florida Park Service also approaches the issue on a case-by-case basis and does not have a comprehensive list of the resources at risk, said Jason Mahon, a spokesman for the Department of Environmental Protection. “In each park’s unit management plan, parks staff identify projects that would help with our coastal resiliency,” Mahon said. “That’s one of the ways we would address that growing issue.”

The Seminole Tribe of Florida is very involved with the statewide efforts, said Backhouse. The vast majority of archaeological sites across the Southeast are Native American, he said, and the region covers much of the tribe’s historic homeland. “The area we’re concerned about isn’t just Florida, Alabama and Georgia, it’s all the way up to Tennessee,” he said. “It’s the entire southeastern United States.”

The tribe has been very public about its interests at Egmont Key, where hundreds of captured Seminoles were held during the Seminole Indian Wars. The key has been at the forefront of the Tribe’s conversations about sea level rise because of its significance in history, said Backhouse. Tribal members “were kind of dumped on the island and left to fend for themselves.”

Within the next 50 to 75 years, much of Egmont Key could be submerged, he said, its memories alive only in the stories retold by tribal elders. “We want the next generation of tribal elders to know what happened on this island,” he said.

Documenting history

Anderson and the scientists who collaborated with him on the new study called for development of a comprehensive database that includes information by state, federal, tribal and local government agencies to identify and create a triage system for the region’s cultural resources.

They suggest consideration be given to relocating or building protective barriers for monuments such as the Castillo de San Marcos and Fort Matanzas. “Delay in thinking about these matters and in seeking solutions accomplishes nothing,” the authors warn.

The Archaeology Network isn’t waiting. The 20 archaeologists working in the program across the state have launched a massive effort to get the sites that could be in the path of the creeping sea confirmed and documented, training citizen scientists to observe and report their findings. The network is connected through the state university system and tries to work in partnership with public land management agencies, such as the state and federal park service and water management districts.

More than 200 volunteers have been trained to assist in the efforts, including a group with the Seminole Tribe. Participants visit known archaeological sites and record what they see. They’re collecting hundreds of reports, building a baseline to be shared with the state, for the Florida Master Site File kept by the state Division of Historical Resources.

“Literally just having photos is one of the most helpful things,” said Ayers-Rigsby. “Are there artifacts washed out? Are there sections that look like they’ve been washed away?”

Volunteers also are expected to answer several questions, said Jeff Moates, the network’s west central director at the University of South Florida.

“Is there anything left?”

“Are there any human remains visible or present?”

In Manatee County, Moates considers Indian middens and burial mounds near De Soto National Memorial, which commemorates the 1539 landing of Hernando de Soto, to be especially endangered. Other endangered sites include Perico Island, Emerson Point, Terra Ceia Island and the runaway slave settlement of Angola on the Manatee River.

The effort to document the historic sites also includes checking to see if the site is mapped in the right place. Miller said some sites recorded 50 or more years ago have never been revisited.

A site “may be described as being (130 feet) from a road that is no longer there,” said Ayers-Rigsby.

Regardless of its location, after an archaeological site is confirmed and recorded by the network and its volunteers, eventually a decision will have to be made as to whether to excavate it and save its contents, or leave its fate to the rising waters.

History goes high-tech

Morris Hylton III, director of the historic preservation program at the University of Florida’s College of Design, Construction and Planning, is preparing for the day when many of the state’s historic structures could be lost.

Hylton is documenting buildings for posterity, using technology from another UF endeavor. The Florida Department of Transportation provided a grant to UF’s GeoPlan Center to create laser-scanned aerials of the state’s coastlines mainly to document roads and bridges, and then to run models indicating how sea level rise could affect that infrastructure. Hylton capitalized on that technology for what is being called the Resilient Communities Initiative.

In February 2016, he laser-scanned a five-block area of Cedar Key from ground level, documenting historic structures from as far away as 490 feet with an accuracy of 0.15 inches. Using the data, he created three-dimensional, model images that he graphically “flooded” to determine the “vulnerability” of those assets. In September 2016, those projections proved to be precisely accurate when Hurricane Hermine submerged the same area.

The technology will enable preservationists to create 3-D records of historic buildings that cannot be relocated, Hylton said. He has used it to document temples in Thailand and Myanmar and other historic buildings in the United States, such as Steinway Hall in New York City. At a national historic preservation conference in Annapolis in the fall, Hylton showed the effects of flooding on the main street in Annapolis, home of the United States Naval Academy, established in 1845.

In South Florida, Hylton recently scanned the stone breakwater barge behind Vizcaya, the historic estate of tycoon James Deering on Biscayne Bay, and the façade of the mansion. Other Florida venues on his to-do list include St. Augustine, Key West and other areas where historic structures may succumb to rising waters.

The data could be used to construct exact replicas or, through virtual reality devices, to recreate structures as images so that future generations can “experience them.”

It won’t be the same as walking through an old fort or other historic building, he said. But it will be preferable to having no record at all.

Tom McLaughlin contributed to this report.














World War I Christmas Truce (WaPo)

$
0
0
The slaughter stopped for a few hours and days along the trenches in France 103 years ago.  Soldiers knew what some generals and statesman forgot.  We're all in this together.  We're all mortal.   Peace is patriotic.

Enough war.

My late father and his 82nd Airborne Divn. veteran buddies would speak at schools, telling kids what war was like, in hopes of ending war.


The Christmas Truce miracle: Soldiers put down their guns to sing carols and drink wine

  

The Christmas Truce in 1914, during World War I, as depicted by the Illustrated London News.
On a frosty, starlit night, a miracle took place. In 1914, a melody drifted over the darkness of No Man’s Land. First “O, Holy Night,” then “God Save the King.”
Peeking over their trenches for what must have been the first time in weeks, British soldiers were surprised to see Christmas trees lit with candles on the parapets of the enemy’s trenches.
Then a shout: “You no shoot, we no shoot!”
The Christmas Truce was a brief, spontaneous cease-fire that spread up and down the Western Front in the first year of World War I. It’s also a symbol of the peace on Earth and goodwill toward humans so often lacking not just on the battlefront but in our everyday lives.
In that spirit, the National World War I Museum and Memorial in Kansas City has published an online gallery of hundreds of accounts of such Christmas truces — letters home from soldiers that were published in British papers.
Here, a sampling of these letters shows the variety and wonder of the Christmas Truce:
“This has been the most wonderful Christmas I have ever struck. We were in the trenches on Christmas Eve, and about 8.30 the firing was almost at a stand still. Then the Germans started shouting across to us, ‘a happy Christmas’ and commenced putting up lots of Christmas trees with hundreds of candles on the parapets of their trenches.” — Cpl. Leon Harris, 13th Battalion, London Regiment (Kensington)
“At 2 am on Christmas morning a German band played a couple of German tunes and then ‘Home, Sweet Home’ very touchingly which made some fellows think a bit. After they played ‘God Save The King’ and we all cheered.” — Pvt. H. Dixon, Royal Warwickshire Regiment
“We would sing a song or a carol first and then they would sing one and I tell you they can harmonise all right.” — Pvt. G. Layton, A Company, 1st Royal Warwickshire Regiment
“Half-way they were met by four Germans, who said they would not shoot on Christmas Day if we did not. They gave our fellows cigars and a bottle of wine and were given a cake and cigarettes. When they came back I went out with some more of our fellows and we were met by about 30 Germans, who seemed to be very nice fellows. I got one of them to write his name and address on a postcard as a souvenir. All through the night we sang carols to them and they sang to us and one played ‘God Save the King’ on a mouth organ.” — Rifleman C.H. Brazier, Queen’s Westminsters of Bishop’s Stortford

German and British soldiers stand together on the battlefield near Ploegsteert, Belgium, during the Christmas Truce. (Imperial War Museum/AP)
“We soon came up to them. About 30 could speak English. One fellow wanted a letter posted to his sweetheart in London.” — Gunner Masterton
“Between the trenches there were a lot of dead Germans whom we helped to bury. In one place where the trenches are only 25 yards apart we could see dead Germans half-buried, their legs and gloved hands sticking out of the ground. The trenches in this position are so close that they are called ‘The Death Trap’, as hundreds have been killed there.” — A junior officer
“On Christmas Day we were out of the trenches along with the Germans, some of whom had a song and dance, while two of our platoons had a game of football. It was surprising to see the German soldiers — some appeared old, others were boys, and others wore glasses . . .  A number of our fellows have got addresses from the Germans and are going to try and meet one another after the war.” — Pvt. Farnden, Rifle Brigade
“On our right was a regiment of Prussian Guards and on our left was a Saxon regiment. On Christmas morning some of our fellows shouted across to them saying that if they would not fire our chaps would meet them half-way between the trenches and spend Christmas as friends. They consented to do so. Our chaps at once went out and when in the open Prussians fired on our men killing two and wounding several more. The Saxons, who behaved like gentlemen, threatened the Prussians if they did the same trick again. Well, during Christmas Day our fellows and the Saxons fixed up a table between the two trenches and they spent a happy time together, and exchanged souvenirs and presented one another with little keepsakes.” — A British soldier
“One of our men was given a bottle of wine in which to drink the King’s health. The regiment actually had a football match with the Germans who beat them 3-2.” — A British officer
 4:04
Silent documentary film provides rare look at World War I

“You said I should probably hardly know it was Christmas Day, but far from it; we had a most extraordinary day and quite different from others. . . . Lots of English and Germans met between the two lines and had talks . . . there were bicycle races on bikes without tyres found in the ruins of the house.” — A British officer
“A hundred yards or so in the rear of our trenches there were houses that had been shelled. These were explored with some of the regulars and we found old bicycles, top-hats, straw hats, umbrellas etc. We dressed ourselves up in these and went over to the Germans. It seemed so comical to see fellows walking about in top-hats and with umbrellas up. Some rode the bicycles backwards. We had some fine sport and made the Germans laugh.” — Brazier
“I daresay you will be surprised at me writing a letter on such paper as this, but you will be more surprised when I tell you that it contained cake given to one of our men by a German officer on Christmas Day, and that I was given some of it . . . We were able to bury our dead, some of whom had been lying there for six weeks or more. We are still on speaking terms with them, so that we have not fired a shot at them up to now (Dec. 29), neither have they, so that the snipers on each side have had a rest.” — Pvt. Alfred Smith, 1st Battalion, Royal Warwickshire Regiment
“Really you would hardly have thought we were at war. Here we were, enemy talking to enemy. They like ourselves with mothers, with sweethearts, with wives waiting to welcome us home again. And to think within a few hours we shall be firing at each other again.” — Masterson

Gaetz casts lone ‘no’ vote on sex trafficking bill (NWFDailyNews.com/Pensacola News Journal)

$
0
0
Despicable first-term U.S. Rep. MATTHEW LOUIS GAETZ II (R-FL1) voted against human trafficking legislation -- the only no vote in Congress.  GAETZ is the sort of sordid Republican who got elected on the Republican ticket in 2016, along with Herr Trump.

GAETZ is a bizarre ideologue, who evidently has emotional problems with government doing its job. So why did GAETZ get elected to Congress? His father's influence? Or the fact his gerrymandered district is the most Republican in Florida, and one of the most Republican in the Nation?

GAETZ has flown with Herr Trump on Air Force One, and like fellow Air Force One passenger Rep. RONALD DION DeSANTIS (R-FL6/KOCH INDUSTRIES), GAETZ  muttered imprecations about firing Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III in retaliation for Mueller's heroic investigation of alleged Trump-Russia crimes against our democracy.

Collusion by clods?  Conscious parallelism after flying with Trump on Air Force One.

This lone wolf vote against human trafficking legislation stinks on ice.

Only mobsters, monsters, human traffickers and inbred Roy Moore supporters would approve of GAETZ's lone wolf vote against legislation on human trafficking.

GAETZ's website lists his committee and subcommittee assignments:

Armed Services Committee

  • Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces
  • Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation

Judiciary Committee

  • Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet
  • Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law

Budget Committee



The Florida Bar website lists GAETZ as still working for an Okaloosa County law firm that represents defense contractors and does government lobbying:

Matthew Louis Gaetz, II

Eligible to Practice Law in Florida 
48962
Keefe, Anchors, Gordon & Moyle, P.A.
Keefe Anchors & Gordon P A
2113 Lewis Turner Blvd Ste 100
Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547-1379
United States
Office: 850-863-1974
Cell: 850-863-1974 - No Text Messages 
Fax: 850-863-1591
https://www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/48962
Okaloosa 
1
02/06/2008
Member
None
William & Mary Law School
Young Lawyers
Keefe, Anchors, Gordon & Moyle, P.A.
11 to 20
Associate 
















































































GAETZ is on the Armed Services Committee.  His law firm advertises its work for defense contractors on its website:

Northwest Florida is home to five major military installations and nearly 20,000 defense industry employees.
Aerospace and defense companies and other military contractors operate in a specialized environment that is both highly competitive and highly scrutinized. Understanding and complying with often complex legal requirements is a critical element of doing business with the government, and failing to adhere to regulatory requirements can have serious commercial and legal consequences.
KAG’s legal team represents small and international businesses that do business with the government, including handling contract claims involving military projects in Florida and overseas. We consult with aerospace, defense, and intelligence contractors in the national security sector and work with small businesses to ensure business practices that conform to federal, state, and local government guidelines.


This firm advertises its lobbying work on its website:

With decades of experience, KAG has built key relationships throughout state and local government.

Businesses big and small are impacted by decisions that are made in the halls of state and local government. The KAG team has broad experience working with and within state, county, and city governments — experience which allows us to guide our clients through often complex bureaucracies in order to achieve their legislative and regulatory goals.

The strategic counsel provided by our government affairs practice includes:

Legislative and regulatory advocacy through strong relationships between clients and elected officials, executive branch leadership and key legislative staff
A thorough and detailed knowledge of public policy and process
Strategic coalition building to support or oppose issues
Effective navigation of the regulatory bureaucracy within a variety of state agencies and local government
Innovative solutions to complex compliance issues
Competent guidance relating to state procurement opportunities and securing state funding for projects and programs


MATTHEW GAETZ 2008 DUI arrest photo


Gaetz casts lone ‘no’ vote on sex trafficking bill  
(NWFDailyNews.com)

By Annie Blanks

Posted Dec 28, 2017 at 1:30 PM
Updated Dec 28, 2017 at 1:49 PM

FORT WALTON BEACH — U.S. Congressman Matt Gaetz cast the lone “no” vote earlier this month on a bipartisan human trafficking bill that sailed through the House and the Senate with otherwise unanimous support.

The bill, dubbed the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act, seeks to give the federal government more resources to fight sex slavery in the United States, particularly addressing how human trafficking occurs on Department of Transportation roads such as Interstate 10.

The bill passed in the Senate with unanimous support in September before moving on to the House, where it passed Dec. 19 by a vote of 418-1.

Gaetz, R-Fort Walton Beach, defended his vote Wednesday, saying he always votes no on bills that establish more government entities.

“I vote against all bills that create new federal boards, agencies, commissions or councils,” Gaetz said. “For all the problems we have, not enough entities in the federal government is not one of them.”

If signed into law, the bill would allow the government to appoint an official to coordinate human trafficking prevention efforts across Department of Transportation modal administrations, create an independent advisory committee on human trafficking and expand outreach and financial assistance programs for the recognition, prevention and reporting of human trafficking.


But Gaetz, who said he was “very involved in combating human trafficking” while he served as the Criminal Justice Committee chairman in the Florida House of Representatives, said he believed the law would create more headaches than help.

“Allowing people to travel around on the government’s dime, creating more paperwork ... it’s not the right answer to nearly any problem we face,” he said.

One of Gaetz’s opponents in the upcoming 2018 election, Republican Cris Dosev of Pensacola, issued a statement Wednesday condemning the representative as “out of touch.”

“That Matt Gaetz could vote against a law to fight human trafficking and sex slave trade is beyond comprehension,” Dosev said in the statement. “What was he thinking? ... Near unanimous bipartisan support on this should be a clear indication that the American people will not tolerate human trafficking.”

The bill’s next stop is the desk of President Donald Trump, where it is expected to be signed into law.


Matt Gaetz defends lone no vote on anti-human trafficking bill

LINKEDIN 4COMMENTMORE
Rep. Matt Gaetz took to Facebook Live on Thursday night from his parents' living room in Walton County to defend his lone no vote on an anti-human trafficking bill that passed both houses of Congress on Dec. 19.
The bill, known as the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act, designates a human trafficking prevention coordinator at the U.S. Department of Transportation and creates a committee in the department to develop best practices for states and transportation groups to combat human trafficking.
Cris Dosev, who is running against Gaetz in the 2018 Republican primary, blasted Gaetz's no vote on the bill in a press release Wednesday calling it "tone deaf."
"That Matt Gaetz could vote against a law to fight human trafficking and sex slave trade is beyond comprehension," Dosev said in the release. "What was he thinking?"
Dosev, a retired Marine and Pensacola real estate developer, came in third in the 2016 Republican primary with nearly 21 percent of the vote behind the late State Sen. Greg Evers who had 22 percent of the vote. Gaetz won the primary with 36 percent of the vote.
In the release, Dosev said the bipartisan bill brings together law enforcement and anti-trafficking groups together to pool information and resources.
"This is something military and business organizations do every day to improve critical outcomes," Dosev said in the release. "It's basic management 101."
In his Facebook Live broadcast, Gaetz defended his vote by first pointing to his role as chairman of the Criminal Justice Committee in the Florida Legislature where he helped make it easier for prosecutors to bring cases against human traffickers in Florida.
"Where there is a necessity to change legal standards to bring prosecutions against human traffickers, I'm all in," Gaetz said. "And I've been very successful in implementing that legislation here in our own state."
Gaetz said he voted no because, despite best intentions of the bill, it represented "mission creep" at the federal level in creating the committee.
"Unless there is an overwhelming, compelling reason that our existing agencies in the federal government can't handle that problem, I vote no because voters in Northwest Florida did not send me to Washington to go and create more federal government," Gaetz said. "If anything, we should be abolishing a lot of the agencies at the federal level like the Department of Education, like the EPA and sending that power back to our state governments."
Without mentioning Dosev's name directly, Gaetz hit back against his Republican opponent.
"I found it a bit comical that this Republican running against me in the primary in 2018 thought that this was the issue to attack me on," Gaetz said. "He apparently takes the view that we really do need to address our problems with more government. And so, if that's your view, if your view is we've got to grow government to solve our problems rather than prioritizing the entities that we already have, well I assure you there's a candidate out there for you, but It's not me."
Dosev said in his press release Gaetz appears more focused on media attention than representing the district.
"It's the latest in a growing list of strange votes by Matt Gaetz, who appears to be more focused on television appearances than advancing legislation that benefits this district and country," Dosev said.
Jim Little can be reached at 850-208-9827 or at jwlittle@pnj.com.


Billionaires supporting RONALD DEON DeSANTIS for Florida Governor (Politico).

$
0
0
MEDIOCRITY LOVES COMPANY: the other-directed puppet of SHERIFF DAVID SHOAR AND PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP is being supported by the billionaire basket of deplorables. These oligarchs are supporting our mediocre Congressman RON DeSANTIS for Governor in the wake of endorsement by President* Asterisk DONALD TRUMP.




Billionaire kingmakers swarm Florida governor's race after Trump endorsement

Not long after an admiring presidential tweet, Congressman Ron DeSantis won the backing of some of the most influential players in GOP politics.

Donald Trump is pictured. | Getty
Just last week, President Donald Trump weighed in on Twitter to say that Rep. Ron DeSantis “would make a GREAT Governor of Florida.” | Chris Kleponis/Pool/Getty Images


After Donald Trump appeared to endorse Ron DeSantis’ campaign for Florida governor last week, a handful of the biggest and most influential billionaires in Republican politics threw their support behind the three-term GOP congressman, upending the race in the nation’s biggest swing state. 
The stable of billionaires and millionaires listed on DeSantis’ “Finance Leadership Team,” obtained by POLITICO, includes casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, hedge fund heiress Rebekah Mercer, investment tycoon Foster Friess and other donors who have funded the conservative Koch brothers’ network and President Trump’s campaign. Just last week, Trump weighed in on Twitter to say that DeSantis “would make a GREAT Governor of Florida.”
DeSantis has yet to formally announce his 2018 campaign for governor, but his intentions to seek the office became clear in May after he established a state political committee, called the Fund for Florida’s Future, that’s allowed to raise and spend unlimited soft money from corporate contributors.
“This sets DeSantis apart from the rest. He will have the financial resources and the ground game and the Trump base to be an incredible statewide candidate,” said David Bossie, a DeSantis backer who founded the Citizens United conservative group, served as Trump’s deputy campaign manager and just co-authored the new “Let Trump Be Trump” book plugged by the president.
Gov. Rick Scott, a Trump loyalist who is leaving office due to term limits, might run for U.S. Senate next year and usually does not endorse in contested Republican primaries.


Normally, national contributors such as Adelson and Mercer don’t get involved in state races. But DeSantis has earned their trust and become a sort of “billionaire whisperer,” said one Florida-based Republican fundraiser.
As a member of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus, DeSantis is a frequent Fox News guest who has earned a reputation as a small-government conservative, an opponent of the independent federal investigation of Trump and a supporter of moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. And donors have so far loved what they have heard.
ADVERTISING

“These big national finance givers are true believers. Donors like Adelson care about Israel, and they watched DeSantis fight for what they care about,” the fundraiser said. “They see him consistently boosting Trump on Fox. So here they have a prominent national congressman who speaks their language, pushes their issue and defends their president.”
A spokesman for the Adelsons, who own the Las Vegas Sands casino empire, said “there is no decision on the level of financial support” for DeSantis but that the husband and wife duo “appreciate and have great respect for the leadership of Congressman Ron DeSantis on numerous issues.”
Mercer’s support for DeSantis stands above the others. She manages the political giving of her father, hedge fund magnate Robert Mercer, and played a key role in the Trump transition. The Mercers, top supporters of Trump’s campaign, own a stake in the conservative Breitbart media enterprise and the Cambridge Analytica data firm used by Trump’s campaign. 
Other top DeSantis finance team members include:
• Bernard Marcus, a Home Depot co-founder who has given nearly $18 million to federal campaigns and political committees since 2000, Federal Election Commission records show. Of that money, more than $7 million went to committees supporting Trump’s 2016 election.
• Thomas Peterffy, the founder of Interactive Brokers, one of the nation’s largest electronic brokerage firms. Peterffy contributed $366,200 in 2016 to two committees helping Trump’s election, according to Federal Election Commission records. Peterffy, according to a Time report, was Florida’s richest immigrant who supported Trump.
• Foster Friess, a Wyoming-based investor who has toyed with running for U.S. Senate in his home state after talking to Mercer and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon. Friess has given more than $4.3 million to federal campaigns and committees since 2000, with more than $2 million going to committees supporting Rick Santorum’s presidential campaign in 2012. Friess also donated $100,000 to the Trump Victory PAC in 2016.


• David A. Siegel, the CEO of Westgate Resorts in Orlando, who contributed $30,000 last year to the Trump Victory committee. Many expect the time-share mogul could start playing more in state and national politics with Trump’s election. Siegel last year said Trump’s election was “the greatest thing that's happened to me since I discovered sex.” Siegel’s wife, Jackie, said she once went on a few dates with Trump.
One name conspicuously absent from DeSantis’ list: Koch. None of the famed conservative brothers have signaled their support for him, though Siegel and other DeSantis backers, such as Dallas investor Doug Deason, are Koch network donors.
In a sign of his rising national profile, DeSantis played golf with Charles Koch in June at a Koch network retreat in Colorado. Another prominent Florida Republican who is considering a bid for governor, state House Speaker Richard Corcoran, didn’t get the same face time. While Trump’s tweet supporting DeSantis put a damper on Corcoran’s prospects, the list of top national donors supporting the congressman makes it even tougher for the state legislative leader to run as the conservative alternative to the GOP front-runner, Florida Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam.
Though many of the big-name Republican donors who announced their support of DeSantis have yet to contribute to the congressman, his campaign-to-be is expecting their financial support in the beginning of the year to eat into the hefty fundraising advantage enjoyed by Putnam, who is widely perceived in Florida conservative circles as having a relatively weak right flank in a Republican primary.
In a state as big as Florida, where a week’s worth of saturation TV during next year’s general election could cost as much as $3 million, cash is king. And Putnam has so far reigned over both his likely and current Democratic and Republican rivals by raising his money from the major industries that do business in Florida’s capitol, such as agricultural interests, the health care industry, power companies and Disney.
With Tallahassee’s institutional GOP donors behind Putnam, a Republican candidate can hope to match him only with outside money or independent wealth, which was a key to Scott’s success in his unexpected primary win in 2010.
Including his campaign and his Florida Grown political committee, Putnam had a total of about $15 million cash on hand at the end of last month. Corcoran, who is not yet an announced candidate, had $4.7 million in the bank in his Watchdog PAC. DeSantis had about $3.6 million in the bank between his political committee and his congressional campaign, whose donors will need to sign off on redirecting their federal contributions to his state race if he runs.
Surveys conducted by Republican pollsters show Putnam leading the GOP primary with less than a third of the vote. DeSantis, depending on the survey, trails by anywhere from 10 points to 20 points. And Corcoran is polling in single digits. More than half of Republican voters say they’re not sure whom they’ll choose. But 80 percent to 90 percent of them back Trump, the polls show.
Trump’s deputy campaign manager, Bossie, said Trump’s support for DeSantis and the backing of the top donors should help DeSantis catch up to Putnam quickly.

DeSantis, 39, is a Yale and Harvard Law School graduate and served as a military prosecutor in the Iraq War before he won his congressional seat in 2012. Putnam, 43, has continuously served in elected office since he was elected to the Florida House at the age of 22, then Congress and then to the position of agriculture commissioner.
“I’m a believer that career politicians looking for the next rung on the ladder are a thing of the past,” Bossie said. “When you look at that and you compare it to the president of the United States tweeting about Ron, his hard work and his service in the military, he is a game-changing candidate.”
Putnam’s campaign is dismissing DeSantis as a Washington pol who wouldn’t stick with his bid for U.S. Senate last year when Marco Rubio decided to run for reelection after Trump defeated him in Florida’s presidential primary.
“I’m hardly concerned about a Washington insider jumping into his second statewide race in two years in desperate search of a promotion. He’s not competition, just a stark contrast to Adam Putnam,” said Amanda Bevis, Putnam’s spokeswoman.
To one of the state’s top Republican fundraisers, lobbyist Brian Ballard, the national firepower of DeSantis’ finance team is unique.


“It’s as impressive a national donor list as I’ve seen,” Ballard said. “The question for Ron is, can he motivate them to get off the list and on to raising and giving considerable dollars? If he does, it will be a huge win for him. If not, it won’t be enough to catch Adam Putnam.”
Ballard, who once lobbied for Trump and spoke recently with the president about DeSantis, dismissed criticism from others who downplayed the significance of the president’s endorsement. Though Trump’s endorsement in Alabama’s recent special Senate race didn’t prove decisive, Ballard said it’s “delusional” to believe Trump’s support in Florida’s primary among DeSantis, Putnam and Corcoran would have no effect.
“Trump’s endorsement is incredibly important,” Ballard said. “The question is, where does it go from the tweet?”

County Attorney PATRICK McCORMACK Neglected AirBnB Agreement for Three Years?: Former County Commission Chair Bennett

$
0
0
PATRICK FRANCIS McCORMACK neglected his duty for three years.  Read the comment from former County Commission Chair PRICILLA BENNETT a/k/a "RACHEL." Thank you for blowing the whistle on malfeasant, mediocre, mendacious County Attorney PATRICK McCORMACK.





Local Airbnb hosts bring in $8.8M in 2017, company says

Airbnb Florida says hosts in St. Johns County brought in $8.8 million in 2017. Roughly 64,800 guest arrivals this year placed the county just outside the top 10 most-booked Florida counties, in the 12th slot.
 
Altogether, the state’s Airbnb hosts earned $450 million from 2.7 million guests.
The 2.7 million guests counted by the California-based homesharing giant represents a 75 percent increase over last year’s guest count.
Six counties welcomed more than 100,000 Airbnb guests — and tens of millions of their dollars.
Miami-Dade County, where hosts made $134.6 million, saw the highest number of guest arrivals in 2017, at 667,200. Osceola County, where hosts made $39.6 million, saw the second highest number of arrivals, at 358,400. Broward County hosts attracted the state’s third-highest number of guest arrivals, 239,600, but made $45.7 million.
According to the company, there are now nearly 40,000 Floridians sharing their homes or vacation rentals through Airbnb, with hosts earning an average of $6,700 annually.
Airbnb is authorized to collect and pay the state sales tax on all bookings in Florida. The company also collects and pays local bed taxes in 39 counties.
In 2017 alone, Airbnb secured new tax agreements with six counties: Miami-Dade, Broward, Sarasota, Polk, Hillsborough and Leon. St. Johns County on Thursday confirmed it has not entered into an agreement regarding the collection of bed taxes.
In counties with agreements, hosts collect and pay nothing and Airbnb collects and remits the taxes, paid by guests as part of their reservation, on their behalf. Hosts in counties not covered by an agreement are still legally obligated to pay their local tax.
Airbnb says the “vacation rental community” of which it is a part is complementing, rather than competing with, the hotel industry. The company cited Gov. Rick Scott’s announcement in November that a record 88.2 million visitors had come to Florida in the first nine months of 2017.
According to Visit Florida, the number of hotel rooms sold in Florida during the third quarter of 2017 grew by 4.7 percent compared to the same period in 2016. During the same period, Florida’s average daily room rate increased by 3 percent and occupancy by 2.9 percent.
A search on Airbnb’s website for two guests, anytime, in St. Johns County yields 300-plus results, which include entire homes and apartments, or private rooms and suites. The average nightly price is $162, with options well below and above that price point.


4 Comments
Sort by 
Tom Reynolds · 
SAR ARTICLE QUOTE:
In 2017 alone, Airbnb secured new tax agreements with six counties: Miami-Dade, Broward, Sarasota, Polk, Hillsborough and Leon.

St. Johns County on Thursday confirmed it has not entered into an agreement regarding the collection of bed taxes.

OF COURSE NOT ........... IT'S THE SMART and RIGHT THING TO DO!

ST JOHNS COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONS DOES NOT HAVE THE SMARTS!

NOR THE COMMON SENSE TO DO THE RIGHT THING! ...See More
LikeReply21d
Linda Matlin · 
Tom Reynolds if you have so many complaints, and nothing good to say, about our county why don’t you move?
LikeReply11d
Tom Reynolds · 
Well Linda Martin, then I would be a GUTLESS COWARD LIKE YOU. YA SEE COWARD LINDA MARTIN, PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE AFRAID TO BETTER THE COUNTY or YOUR ONE OF THE HIGHLY UNETHICAL, COMPLETELY INCOMPETENT, DUMBER THAN A BOX of ROCKS PEOPLE THAT IS PART of COUNTY FAILURE AFTER FAILURE!

SOoooo "LINDA MARTIN the COWARD" GO CRAWL BACK UNDER THE BLANKETS and PUT THE COVERS OVER YOUR HEAD!

I GOT WORK TO DO EXPOSING THE LOUSY WORK of ST JOHNS COUNTY EMPLOYEES! 

AND IN THE END .............. ST JOHNS COUNTY WILL BE BETTER!

MAKE ST JOHNS COUNTY NORMAL, ...See More
LikeReply15hEdited
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 
Uninformed ukase of defenders of the status quo -- "MOVE." How rude, gauche and louche. What a cliche.
LikeReply2h
Rachael Bennett
Gotta agree with Tom on this one. Do the math- $0.04 bed tax x $8,800,000= a good chunk of change.
The County Attorney was directed to negotiate an agreement with Air BnB almost 3 years ago. Cannot imagine why there is still no agreement.
LikeReply41d
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 
Thank you! Requesting documents. Happy New Year!
LikeReply2h
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 
It's my Request No. 2017-731. My 731st record request of local, state and federal governments this year.  
LikeReply2h
Diane Keller Garrison
I think what's missing here is that a lot of the properties listed on Airbnb are actually businesses - not private citizens. So taxes are collected for the most part but still why don't we collect from the rest?
It's a good point - anything to help our county would be good!
LikeReply1d
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 
AirBnB bed tax money not collected is a sign of malpractice.
LikeReply2h


PATRICK FRANCIS McCORMACK
(Photo credit: HCN)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Slavin
To: pmccormack
Sent: Sat, Dec 30, 2017 2:31 pm
Subject: Request No. 2017-731: Patrick Francis McCormack Delays re: AirBnB bed tax agreement

Dear Mr. McCormack:
1. Please send any documents on your negotiations on bed taxes with AirBnB since 2014.  If none, please explain.
2. On Facebook and the St. Augustine Record website, former Commission Chair Rachel  Bennett wrote December 29, 2017: "The County Attorney was directed to negotiate an agreement with Air BnB almost 3 years ago. Cannot imagine why there is still no agreement."
3. Kindly call me today to discuss. 
Thank you and Happy New Year.
With kindest regards, I am,

FLORIDA AG PAM BONDI: Bed Tax Money Can Now Fund Transit (If Tourism-Related)

$
0
0


The late former St. Augustine Mayoral candidate Peter Romano's idea about restoring trolleys -- previously shared by former St. Augustine Mayor Len Weeks -- can now become a reality here in St. Augustine.  Like the trolleys in New Orleans, Memphis, Denver (above).

Read AG Pam Bondi's November 22, 2017 opinion:




Advisory Legal Opinion - AGO 2017-06
Number: AGO 2017-06
Date: November 22, 2017
Subject: Funding transit system with tourist development tax

Mr. Tim Norris
Chairman, Walton County Tourist 
Development Council
25777 US Highway 331 South
Santa Rosa Beach, Florida 32459

RE: COUNTIES – TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX – TRANSIT SYSTEM OPERATED BY A PRIVATE COMPANY – whether the county may use revenues received from the tourist development tax to fund a transit system to be operated by a private company. § 125.0104(5)(a)3., Fla. Stat.

Dear Mr. Norris: 

This office has received your inquiry on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners of Walton County, asking the following question:

Whether the county may use proceeds of the tourist development tax under section 125.0104(5)(a)3., Florida Statutes, to fund, in whole or in part, a transit system operated by a private company.

In sum:

Section 125. 0104(5)(a)3., Florida Statutes, which authorizes use of tourist development tax revenues for “an activity, service, venue, or event” when one of its main purposes is to attract tourism, does not encompass funding to operate a transit system in general, but would support funding for specific transportation services that are clearly intended to attract tourism. 

The Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, authorizes counties to impose a tax on short-term rentals of living quarters or accommodations within the county (with certain exceptions not pertinent here). This office has often stated that “the intent and purpose of the act was to provide for the advancement, generation, growth and promotion of tourism, the enhancement of the tourist industry, and the attraction of conventioneers and tourists from within and without the state to a particular area or county of the state.”[1]

The projects that can be funded by the tourist development tax are enumerated in subsection (5) of the statute.[2] Each is related to the attraction of tourists to the county.[3] You suggest that section 125.0104(5)(a)3., Florida Statutes, provides the specific authority to fund the operation of a transit system. That provision states:

“(a) All tax revenues received pursuant to this section by a county imposing the tourist development tax shall be used by that county for the following purposes only:

* * *

3. To promote and advertise tourism in this state and nationally and internationally; however, if tax revenues are expended for an activity, service, venue, or event, the activity, service, venue, or event must have as one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists[.]” (e.s.)

This provision is specifically tailored to authorize funding for the promotion[4] and advertisement of various attractions within the county to tourists.

“Nothing in section 125.0104(5), Florida Statutes, suggests that the tourist development tax is a broad funding source. Rather, the tax revenues are a targeted funding source to directly and primarily promote tourism.”[5] Thus, such revenues cannot be used to fund a public transit system for the citizens of Walton County that would incidentally benefit tourists. Instead, to warrant use of tourist development tax revenues for transportation services under subsection (5)(a)3., there must be a clear and direct relationship between the promotion of tourism and the particular transportation service being offered.[6] Such transportation services should involve routes and schedules addressing the specific needs of tourists, and might include, for example, a shuttle connecting hotels and motels with county tourist attractions.  

Although subsection (5)(a)3. does not restrict services eligible for funding to those which are publicly provided,[7] each qualifying service must clearly enhance the County’s ability to attract tourists, and each must be promoted to tourists in a manner demonstrating that tourism is one of its central purposes. Therefore, before allocating revenues to any transportation service for which funding is sought, the Walton County Board of County Commissioners must make a case-by-case factual determination, based on a consideration of these factors, regarding whether a main purpose of the service is to attract tourists.  

These principles are reflected in prior opinions discussing the use of tourist development funds. In Attorney General Opinion 2000-25, this office was asked about a county’s use of tourist development funds (1) to cosponsor with a private corporation a bass fishing tournament at a county facility, and (2) to sponsor a two-day event at a private racetrack. This office concluded that tourist development funds could not be used to operate or promote a private sports facility, because subsection (5)(a)1. requires that sports facilities be publicly owned to receive tourist development tax dollars. Revenues could be used, however, pursuant to what is now subsection (5)(a)3., for the particular attraction or event being held, so long as the governing body made the legislative determination that one of the main purposes of the event was to attract tourists. 

In an informal opinion provided to Circuit Court Clerk Scott Ellis of Titusville, this office was asked about using tourist development revenues for the day-to-day operations of a “county contracted arts and culture-focused nonprofit entity,” the Brevard Cultural Alliance.[8] Such operations would include salaries of agency personnel, costs of marketing and printing, and insurance and employee benefits. This office concluded that under section 125.0104(5)(a)3., Florida Statutes, tourist development tax revenues could be used for particular events and activities put on by the organization to promote tourism, but not for its daily administrative expenses.  

Therefore, it is my opinion that revenues from a tourist development tax may be used for specific tourist-oriented transportation services based upon a showing that one of the main purposes of each individual service provided is to attract tourists to Walton County.  

Sincerely,

Pam Bondi
Attorney General

PB/tebg
______________________________________________________________________

[1] Op. Att’y Gen. Fla. 83-18 (1983).  See also Ops. Att’y Gen. Fla. 14-02 (2014) and 13-29 (2013).

[2]  See, e.g., Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc., 175 So. 3d 730, 736 (Fla. 2015); Freni v. Collier County, 588 So. 2d 291, 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

[3] “Tourist” means “a person who participates in trade or recreation activities outside the county of his or her permanent residence or who rents or leases transient accommodations as described in paragraph (3)(a).” §125.0104(2)(b)2., Fla. Stat.

[4] “Promotion” means “marketing or advertising designed to increase tourist-related business activities.” § 125.0104(2)(b)1., Fla. Stat.

[5] Informal Opinion to Hon. Scott Ellis, December 16, 2014.

[6]  See Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 15-14 (2015), 14-02 (2014), 12-38 (2012), 10-26 (2010), and 10-09 (2010).

[7] You have indicated that the transit system in question will be operated by a private company. Because Art. VII, § 10 of the Fla. Const. prohibits a county from using its taxing power to aid a private entity, even those projects authorized by § 125.0104, Fla. Stat., must be shown to “serve a paramount public purpose,” with only “incidental benefits” accruing to a private party, to be eligible for funding.  State v. Osceola County, 752 So. 2d 530, 539 (Fla. 1999) (affirming the validation of bonds issued to acquire a convention center from a private entity that would operate the facility, using revenues from a tourist development tax to pay the debt service, finding that “[t]he fact that the proposed project will be operated by a private entity does not negate the public character of the project”).

[8]  See supra, n.5. 



PETER ROMANO prepared a 20 minute video promoting trolleys in St. Augustine

2001 Ed Slavin letter re: City of St. Augustine's loony laws -- unconstitutional anti-artist ordinances (SAR)

$
0
0



Bruce Kevin Bates, twice-prevailing plaintiff in First Amendment litigation against City of St. Augustine, Florida. (HCN).

History has proven us right. Visual artists have won twice in federal court in 2009 and 2016-2017 (Bates v. City of St. Augustine I & II).

Our streets are still "not lively," as Mayor Nancy Shaver said in 2015. Panhandlers have taken the place of buskers.

In 2018, let's restore artists and musicians to their rightful place on St. George Street.


Letter: Let's not repeat history
Edward A. Slavin Jr.
St. Augustine
Published Wednesday, April 18, 2001
St. Augustine Record

Are we condemned to repeat history? In 1964, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. led demonstrations against an old St. Augustine ''tradition'' -- ''Jim Crow'' segregation. The demonstrators were right. The city was wrong. History celebrates Dr. King and the civil rights movement.

On April 1, some 100 people demonstrated against the city ordinance persecuting St. George Street artists under penalty of criminal laws. That's equal to 1 percent of the city's registered voters; some elections turn on thinner margins. The ill-advised city and manager ignore ''public opinion'' from visitors and residents alike (March 20). On April 1, The Record called for a negotiated settlement of the artist ordinance before it gets to court. That's wise advice. Losing repeatedly in the courts, the city should ''drop the oyster and leave the wharf.'' Do it now -- before the city's shame is permanently engraved in law books, along with Supreme Court decisions forever placing the stain of human rights violations on Jacksonville and Boca Raton.

Jacksonville's loony laws led to a wonderful U.S. Supreme Court precedent, Papachristou vs. city of Jacksonville, banning unconstitutional ''void-for-vagueness'' laws against ''vagrancy'' (or anything else). Justice William O. Douglas wrote the court's 1972 opinion, a monument to the genius of a free people.

A city of Boca Raton manager sexually harassed a woman lifeguard; Boca burghers unwisely appealed from a small judgment. The result in 1998: the leading Supreme Court precedent on ''hostile working environments.'' After its harasser and co-ed lifeguard locker room made history, Boca removed the lifeguard HQ sign, but not the permanent taint to Boca's name.

Once tour trains operators were harassed. Who's next? St. Augustine's ''historical'' area was long home to ''buskers.''''Buskers'' have a legal ''right to exist,'' just like Israel (which only a few terrorists now deny). ''Buskers'' are part of our wonderful town. Shop owners should not look down their noses at buskers, but salute them and celebrate diversity. As JFK said, ''a rising tide lifts all boats.''

Inside the Castillo? Federal property, not city streets. Colonial Williamsburg? Quite a contrast: no T-shirt shops, hundreds paid to work in costume by a mega-foundation with fat management salaries, high prices charged to enter restored buildings. Williamsburg pushed to charge admission to people walking city streets inside Williamsburg; that effort failed. Williamsburg requires anyone conducting history tours to pass an ''official history'' test (with a loophole for Williamsburg employees but not volunteers). Moonlighting Williamsburg volunteers risk arrest if they lead bus tourists for pay and ''deviate'' from the ''official history'' syllabus (talking about the Civil War?) or fail to report a tourist for violating city, state or federal laws. Sadly, no proud Virginian sued over Williamsburg's hysterical lawmaking and ''official history.''

St. Augustine is more human(e): citizens will not rest while our city violates anyone's rights. Saint Augustine said, ''An unjust law is no law at all.'' Jesus said: ''That which you do to the least of my brothers (and sisters), you do unto me.''

Sheriff DAVID SHOAR's obstruction of justice -- obvious and ongoing -- is featured in Record's year-end review article

$
0
0



Controversial St. Johns County SHERIFF DAVID BERNARD SHOAR continues to duck questions about obstruction of justice.
(NY Times photo)

SHOAR, who legally changed his name from "HOAR" in 1994, faced increased scrutiny 2013-2017 over the September 2, 2010 Michelle O'Connell homicide.

Will SHOAR/HOAR leave office in 2018? 


Good year-end article by St. Augustine Record reporter Jake Martin, including 351 words about Sheriff DAVID SHOAR's campaign of intimidation and harassment against FDLE Special Agent Rusty Rodgers.  (Except for line about how SHOAR "didn't have a voice" in article -- SHOAR repeatedly refused New York Times interview requests, 2013-2017.)

Any residual respect for Sheriff David Shoar rapidly dissipated in response to the June 2017 New York Times article about Sheriff Shoar's efforts to prosecute and fire FDLE Special Agent Rusty Ray Rodgers for doing his job "too well" on the Michelle O'Connell shooting investigation.

Sheriff Shoar refuses to be interviewed by internationally respected reporters with critical thinking skills, on the record, including The New York Times, PBS Frontline and three-time Pulitzer Prize winner Walt Bogdanich.

Sheriff Shoar's rodomontade, like that of President Donald Trump, masks deep-seated inadequacies, insecurities and potential criminal liability.

Sheriff Shoar obstructed justice, 2010-2017, and has no defense.

Sheriff Shoar's former associates are distancing themselves.

Sheriff Shoar is rarely seen in public any longer.

Sheriff Shoar may resign and be replaced by a Governor Rick Scott appointee.

Thanks to the Times' work, St. Johns County residents now know that government corruption in this one-party Republican oligarchy (the wealthiest per capita income county in Florida), extends to local lawmen covering up a homicide in a deputy's home with the deputy's service weapon, calling it a "suicide" without scientific support, then mounting a four-year campaign of intimidation and harassment directed against the special agent who Shoar selected to do an investigation of Deputy Jeremy Banks.

We now know that Sheriff Shoar has no moral compass. Sheriff Shoar spent hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars in his obstruction of justice scheme, trying to ruin the career of a decorated FDLE investigator.

Until the Time's article, Sheriff Shoar did this with impunity and apparent immunity, as a result of Shoar's relationships with Governor Rick Scott and other members of Shoar's party.

Enough. We look forward to the FBI and U.S. Attorney doing their job in 2018, bringing the Michelle O'Connell and Rusty Rodgers cases to a federal grand jury. Enough corruption in St. Johns County.





Posted December 31, 2017 06:10 am - Updated December 31, 2017 09:34 am
By JAKE MARTIN jake.martin@staugustine.com
YEAR IN REVIEW: 2017 brings Irma, Confederate monuments debate, vagrancy concerns and more


Another year, another storm.

For what seemed like an eternity but what was actually only a week or so in early September, the entire state of Florida watched Hurricane Irma pick up steam in the Atlantic, then in the Caribbean, as it made its way toward the vulnerable peninsula.

Just days before the storm struck, no one could be sure which side of the state it would even make landfall.

Although Hurricane Irma had significantly weakened by the time she made it to St. Johns County, after slamming into the Keys as a Category 4 storm, her track, size and interaction with a nor’easter here meant she still packed a powerful punch. Uncalled for, really.

The hurricane passed much of Northeast Florida to the west, exposing the region to the dangerous northeast quadrant that national meteorologists had been circling and drawing arrows toward all weekend.

Apart from the strong winds and rains of these outer bands, their collisions with the separate storm system coming in from the Atlantic resulted in a number of tornadoes, one of which ripped entire walls and roofs off condos at the Summerhouse Beach & Racquet Club and nearby homes in Crescent Beach.

Swollen creeks and rivers plus heavy rains equaled flooding for many residents along those waterways, especially in Hastings and Flagler Estates.

Many residents in Davis Shores who were just getting back to normal after Hurricane Matthew in October 2016 soon found themselves ripping out baseboards, sweeping muck out of their homes and doing all the other things they didn’t care to relive.

In Vilano Beach and points north, Irma stirred up violent seas that once again undermined a number of homes built along the beach. A fallen house in Vilano Beach — just barely holding on to a tiny piece of sand dune that kept it from tumbling into the ocean — became the defining image for much of the country of Irma’s effects, at least in this corner of the state.

Recovery from Irma, and even from Matthew, continues.

The county is seeking reimbursement for a number of hurricane recovery efforts related to both storms from the Federal Emergency Management Agency through its Public Assistance program. Officials say it will be a years-long process.

In the meantime, it’s a good bet fingers are crossed from the banks of the St. Johns River to what’s left of the Atlantic coastline that next hurricane season will be a little kinder.

Monuments debate

Like other cities throughout the South this year, St. Augustine saw a debate over the future of its Confederate monuments simmer and boil over numerous times.

City Manager John Regan in October asked commissioners to keep one such monument in the Plaza de la Constitucion, but to also add context (to be determined by a committee of citizens). His recommendation came after an August meeting where public comment lasted hours as residents shared their opinions on the monument.

Some said it symbolizes racism, hatred and slavery and should be moved. Others said it’s a memorial to local men who died that should be kept alongside other war memorials as well as tributes to other causes in that same plaza.

The monument was built by the Ladies Memorial Association in the 1870s. A marble plaque on the west face of the monument reads, simply, “Our Dead.” Other marble tablets contain names of the dead and eulogies.

Another monument, to Confederate Gen. William Loring’s service in the Civil War and other conflicts, is in another area of the plaza that is not under city control but under the University of Florida’s.

That monument was installed in 1920 by the Daughters of the Confederacy and bears relief carvings of both the Confederate flag and the American flag. It also refers to Loring as a “distinguished American soldier” whose ability was recognized by three governments. Loring’s ashes are buried on the site, although they’ve been buried elsewhere before, including in New York City, where he died in 1886.

UF officials have said it won’t be until at least spring that they decide what, if anything, to do about the monument.

Ahead of the lighting ceremony in November to kick off the Nights of Lights, the Rev. Ron Rawls of St. Paul AME Church and hundreds of fellow protesters, black and white, marched on the Plaza chanting “Take them down.” But their chants were countered with chants from some in the crowd of “No one cares,” as well as chants from St. Augustine Tea Party members and Three Percenters of “Leave them up.”

Most people, waiting out the unrest on their blankets or in their fold-out chairs with their kids, seemed to want no part of it.

City tackles vagrancy

Residents and business owners this year put the pressure on officials to crack down on panhandling and vagrancy in the downtown area as the city continues to face challenges addressing its homeless population.

“It’s getting worse. It’s not getting better,” Regan said in October. “It’s not lost on the city.”

A Facebook group called the St. Augustine Vagrant Watch Group began documenting instances of local panhandling and vagrancy, with the stated goal being to motivate elected leaders and law enforcement to take action. Officials said they would prefer such documentation be shared directly with them, along with descriptions of what was witnessed and how it affected their experience or their business.

Since 2016, the city has not enforced anti-panhandling laws because of a U.S. District Court decision in Tampa that questioned their constitutionality. Rules against aggressive panhandling still can be enforced, however.

The city is currently considering a rewrite of its panhandling laws. In the meantime, the police department has ramped up its presence in the St. George Street area.

Sheriff back in spotlight

A front-page story published in a Sunday edition of The New York Times in June once again put the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office, and its handling of the Michelle O’Connell death investigation, on a national stage.

The story this time around was not about what did or did not happen in a bedroom in the home of deputy Jeremy Banks, where, on Sept. 2, 2010, his girlfriend, the 24-year-old O’Connell, was found dead of a gunshot wound. Instead, in a five-page story just short of 7,000 words, three-time Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalist Walt Bogdanich focused on what he portrayed as a disinformation campaign waged by Sheriff David Shoar to cast doubt on the Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s investigation of the case.

At the center of the story was FDLE agent Rusty Rodgers, who was assigned to the case after O’Connell’s family raised concerns about the original investigation, conducted by the Sheriff’s Office, that ultimately concluded the death was a suicide.

Shoar didn’t have a voice in the Times’ story and told The Record the day after he hadn’t read it. He called Bogdanich “one of the most dishonest men I’ve met in my life” and claimed that he refused to look at anything “that had to do with the culpability of Rodgers.”

Shoar maintained that Rodgers manufactured and exaggerated evidence during his investigation (claims that are at least partially substantiated by FDLE’s own internal review of Rodger’s conduct in the case) and that he came to the case with the assumption that Banks was guilty of homicide. He came to view Bogdanich’s stories in a similar light.

“Bogdanich, the day he showed up here, already had his stories written and his mind made up on everything,” Shoar said. “The guy’s a narcissist, he’s full of himself, and when he came down here I didn’t kiss his ass.”

If you can stomach a pot of coffee and have a morning to spare, go to http://nyti.ms/2rONQfi to read an online version of the Times’ story, “A Mother’s Death, a Botched Inquiry and a Sheriff at War.”


Hastings dissolution

In November, the people of the Town of Hastings spoke.

Residents there voted overwhelmingly to dismantle their town government and revoke its charter. More than 82 percent of votes, 136, were in favor, while 29 people cast votes against the proposal, according to the St. Johns County Supervisor of Elections.

“I’m OK with it. … I kind of pictured it rolling this way,” Mayor Tom Ward said after the results came in.

The vote came about a year after town commissioners voted to study what dissolution would look like, which was a direct result of residents expressing concerns about water rates and the financial stability and viability of the town.

St. Johns County will take over operations and assume the town’s assets and liabilities by the end of February.

Bathroom policy challenged

In June, Drew Adams, a junior at Allen D. Nease High School, filed a lawsuit against the St. Johns County School District over what he sees as discrimination in being denied access to the male restrooms.

Adams was entering his freshman year at Nease when he let school administrators know that though he was born a girl, he was transgender. Transitioning meant having surgery, taking hormones, using male pronouns and availing himself of the boys bathroom.

For a few weeks, things went fine. But then the school district informed him he was not allowed to use the boys bathroom and told him to use the girls bathroom or a gender-neutral one instead.

The school district’s bathroom policies, which require students use the bathroom of their biological sex, aren’t written anywhere. The only written guidelines don’t explicitly ban students from using the bathroom of their gender identities.

Adams’ lawsuit against the school district comes down to one question: By refusing to let the transgender teen use the boys bathroom, did the district violate his rights? The case has made it all the way to the federal court.

A three-day, non-jury trial began Dec. 11 at the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Jacksonville, with Judge Timothy J. Corrigan presiding.

As Corrigan has said: “What this case is about — what it’s only about is — notwithstanding whatever well-intentioned motives the district has, does the district’s policy nevertheless violate Title IX (education laws) or does it violate the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution?”

Corrigan will tour Nease High School for himself in January; both sides will then file a document summarizing the law, the facts and their positions; oral arguments will be heard in February; and then Corrigan will issue an order. He has said he wants to make a ruling before Drew starts his senior year next fall.

favorite son dies

April saw the passing of historian Michael Gannon, 89, in Gainesville. Gannon was celebrated locally for his role in keeping St. Augustine in the national spotlight as the United States of America’s oldest continually-occupied European settlement.

He was so protective of St. Augustine’s 1565 founding that he often provoked the residents of Jamestown, Virginia, and Plymouth, Massachusetts, with his now famous quote: “By the time Jamestown was founded in 1607 and Plymouth in 1620, St. Augustine was up for urban renewal.”

Among his lasting visible accomplishments in the city was the construction and oversight of the 208-foot Great Cross at Mission Nombre de Dios to celebrate the city’s 400th anniversary in 1965.



2 Comments
Alexander Shiraz · 

It’s shocking the Record doesn’t mention the record breaking protest held in solidarity with the DC Women’s March on January 21, 2017. How could you possibly miss that?
LikeReply14h
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

This was a local year-end story.
LikeReply26m
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Any residual respect for Sheriff David Shoar rapidly dissipated in response to the June 2017 New York Times article about Sheriff Shoar's efforts to prosecute and fire FDLE Special Agent Rusty Ray Rodgers for doing his job "too well" on the Michelle O'Connell shooting investigation.

Sheriff Shoar refuses to be interviewed by internationally respected reporters with critical thinking skills, on the record, including The New York Times, PBS Frontline and three-time Pulitzer Prize winner Walt Bogdanich.

Sheriff Shoar's rodomontade, like that of President Donald Trump, masks deep-seated inadequacies, insecurities and potential criminal liability.

Sheriff Shoar obstructed justice, 2010-2017, and has no defense.

Sheriff Shoar's former associates are distancing themselves.

Sheriff Shoar is rarely seen in public any longer.

Sheriff Shoar may resign and be replaced by a Governor Rick Scott appointee.

Thanks to the Times' work, St. Johns County residents now know that government corruption in this one-party Republican oligarchy (the wealthiest per capita income county in Florida), extends to local lawmen covering up a homicide in a deputy's home with the deputy's service weapon, calling it a "suicide" without scientific support, then mounting a four-year campaign of intimidation and harassment directed against the special agent who Shoar selected to do an investigation of Deputy Jeremy Banks.

We now know that Sheriff Shoar has no moral compass. Sheriff Shoar spent hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars in his obstruction of justice scheme, trying to ruin the career of a decorated FDLE investigator.

Until the Time's article, Sheriff Shoar did this with impunity and apparent immunity, as a result of Shoar's relationships with Governor Rick Scott and other members of Shoar's party.

Enough. We look forward to the FBI and U.S. Attorney doing their job in 2018, bringing the Michelle O'Connell and Rusty Rodgers cases to a federal grand jury. Enough corruption in St. Johns County.

Sheriff SHOAR's overt acts of retaliation against FDLE agent are unrebutted: NY Times reporter Walt Bogdanich

$
0
0



In response to reporter Jake Martin's December 31, 2017, New York Times reporter Walt Bogdanich wrote the St. Augustine Record, noting that NONE of the facts in Walter Botdanich's articles have ever been challenged or rebutted by Sheriff DAVID SHOAR.  NO retraction was corrected.  SHOAR lives in an  emotional, fact-free zone;


NYT Reporter: Shoar hasn’t asked for retraction

Editor: I noticed that in your paper’s recent list of the most important stories of 2017 (http://bit.ly/2CcytmY), you included my article documenting Sheriff Shoar’s attempt to discredit a state law enforcement officer who had found serious shortcomings with the sheriff’s investigation of the Michelle O’Connell shooting. Sheriff Shoar was understandably not pleased with my report, and you said as much. What you did not say is that the sheriff has never once sought a retraction or cited any errors of fact in the thousands of words I have written about the case.
Readers who may have missed my article, which was based on thousands of pages of previously undisclosed public records and dozens of interviews, can find it at: http://nyti.ms/2lG7Ctg.
Walt Bogdanich
Investigative reporter,
The New York Times
































St. Augustine Beach Commissioners Vote 3-2 to Curb Your Free Speech Rights

$
0
0
Tired of criticism of government officials, St. Augustine Beach Vice Mayor MARGARET ENGLAND, newly appointed Commissioner DONALD SAMORA and disgraced ex-Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN voted  Saturday January 6, 2018 to limit public comment on agenda items to two minutes.

Their action was in response to newly-appointed Commissioner DONALD SAMORA's attack at his very first meeting last year.  SAMORA was supported for the gig by St. Augustine Vice Mayor TODD DAVID NEVILLE a/k/a "ODD TODD.".

Dissenting were new Mayor Undine Pawlowski George and Commissioner Maggie Kostka.

Commissioners had no factual or legal research -- it was a bare naked violation of First and Ninth Amendment rights.  Every single public comment speaker was against it.

Who benefits? (Cui Bono?

Developers.

Vendors.

Corrupters.

Lobbyists.

Enemies of free speech.

SAMORA must run for office this year if he wants to retain his seat.

Vice Chair MARGARET ENGLAND must run for re-eletion if she wants to retain her seat.

Mayor George must run for re-election if she wants to retain her seat.

The line of candidates opposed to SAMORA and ENGLAND has already formed.

Rosetta Bailey has filed to run against SAMORA (she filed for the seat last year, after Commissioner Sherman Gary Snodgrass told me he would  not run for re-election, and before he resigned.)

ROSETTA BAILEY is running against authoritarian Commissioner DONALD SAMORA

Here's the contact information for St. Augustine Beach Commissioners:



Commission

Portrait of Commissioner Rich O'Brien.Rich O'Brienex-Mayor/Commissioner(904) 814-2080comrobrien@cityofsab.org
Portrait of Commissioner Undine GeorgeUndine GeorgeMayor/Commissioner(904) 687-1492comugeorge@cityofsab.org
Commissioner Don SamoraDon SamoraCommissioner(904) 460-4404comdsamora@cityofsab.org
Portrait of Commissioner Maggie KostkaMaggie KostkaCommissioner(904) 669-5132commkostka@cityofsab.org
Portrait of Commissioner Margaret EnglandMargaret EnglandVice Mayor/ Commissioner(904) 461-3454commengland@cityofsab.org

St. Johns County Republicans: "We need to make sure that only PRO TRUMP candidates on the local and state level are elected."

$
0
0
No critical thinking skills desired or required by local GOP in St. Johns County, Florida. Kooky KKK-style litmus test from the St. Johns County Republican Executive Committee and its "TRUMP CLUB."

ANGRY WHITE WOMAN'S FURIOUS FATWA: "We need to make sure that only PRO TRUMP candidates on the local and state level are elected." NOW THAT'S A LITMUS TEST. This was the unctuous ukase emitted by Ponte Vedra Beach heiress DIANE HAGAN SCHERFF, St. Johns County Republican Executive Committee Second Vice President.  Her prior ignorant nonsense included a hateful Thanksgiving letter and a furious fulminating February 2017 fatwa calling for a "boycott" of the "liberal" St. Augustine Record:

Will Hotelier KANTI PATEL try to turn skyscraper bank building into six-story hotel? (JAX DAILY RECORD)

$
0
0
Speculator KANTI PATEL just bought the iconic six-story downtown bank building for $10 million.

Knowing how our City of St. Augustine, Florida officials have historically kowtowed to shadowy hotelier KANTI PATEL I'm wondering whether any of them would ever EVEN think about letting PATELturn the iconic six story Treasury building into a hotel?

It would violate our fire safety, building code and zoning laws. 

There's not enough parking here and there's a severe mobility problem here in St. Augustine.

But a City government too often "frozen in the ice of its own indifference" (in FDR's words), one that too often rubber-stamps bad projects, is capable of (nearly) anything. 

As former local Fox TV journalist-vidoographer J.D. Pleasant told me nearly 13 years ago, "They will say and do anything."

What do you reckon?

Will a dodgy developer be allowed to break the law (again)?  Stay tuned. 

This is worthy of investigation and litigation. 

Enough greedy developers ruining "our village," as County Commission Chairman Henry Dean calls it. 

Click here to support my independent investigative reporting and advocacy on development, environment and historic preservation in St. Augustine, Florida.

Thanks to Jacksonville's Daily Record (February 2, 2018):






JAX DAILY RECORDFRIDAY, FEB. 2, 201810:21 AM EST

Treasury on the Plaza in St. Augustine sold for $10 million

Kasam Hospitality buys property from California investment company.
by: Scott Sailer Editorial Research Director
The Treasury on the Plaza in St. Augustine’s historic district sold Tuesday for $10 million.
Kasam Hospitality, a hotel developer based in St. Augustine, bought the six-story building at 24 Cathedral Place from Virtu Cathedral Associates LLC, a California-based investment company that has owned the property since 2001.



The interior of The Treasury on the Plaza.

The building opened in 1927 as the First National Bank Building and has housed different banks until 2013, when Wells Fargo moved out. The building has been used as a private event venue since 2014, most notably for weddings.
The registered agent for Kasam Hospitality Inc. is Kanti Patel, the owner of the proposed San Marco Hotel at 28 San Marco Ave.




Nicholas von Hoffman, R.I.P.

$
0
0
Journalist and columnist Nicholas von Hoffman, one of my early journalistic heroes, has died. Mr. von Hoffman, like H.L. Mencken, was unencumbered by a college degree. But he learned community with Saul Alinsky, covered civil rights struggles and the Chicago 7, and wrote with energy and style, with verve and a lot of nerve. He will be greatly missed. Until his firing, von Hoffman was featured on 60 Minutes in Point-Counterpoint, with James Jackson Kilpatrick. They made a great pair of debaters. Don Hewitt fired von Hoffman in 1974 in retaliation for First Amendment protected activity -- comparing corrupt Republican President RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON to a "dead mouse on a kitchen floor.""The question," he said of the president, "is who is going to pick it up by the tail and drop it in the trash. At this point it makes no difference whether he resigns, thereby depositing himself in a sanitary container, or whether Congress scoops him up in the dustpan of impeachment. But as an urgent national health measure, we've got to get that decomposing political corpse out of the White House."

BTW: When I applied for a Fund for Investigative Journalism grant (at age 21) to investigate TVA and coal monopolies in Tennessee, Mr. Kilpatrick was on the board that approved it; I was told he voted for me even though I had "split an infinitive." Thus chastened inspired, I never split an infinitive for the next 40 years in the millions of words that I have written for publication or litigation.

Here are obituaries from The New York Times and Cato Institute's Reason:








Photo

Nicholas von Hoffman in 1972. “I sincerely believe in what I write, and I get a kick out of getting those Washington mossbacks angry,” he said. CreditGeorge Tames/The New York Times 

Nicholas von Hoffman, a provocative author, broadcast commentator and syndicated columnist who examined American politics and culture for five decades from a left-wing perspective, died on Thursday in Rockport, Me. He was 88.
His son Alexander said the cause was kidney failure. Mr. von Hoffman, who died in a health center in Rockport, lived in Tenants Harbor, Me.
In a journalistic métier of mingled fact, opinion and literary devices, Mr. von Hoffman wrote for The Washington Post from 1966 to 1976, contributed to major magazines, aired his views on national television and radio and wrote more than a dozen books, including “Citizen Cohn” (1988), a best-selling biography of Roy M. Cohn, the chief counsel to Senator Joseph R. McCarthy in his 1950s anti-communist crusades.
Mr. von Hoffman, who never attended college, styled himself a “creative troublemaker” after his mentor, the social activist Saul Alinsky, for whom he worked as a community organizer in Chicago before starting his journalism career at The Chicago Sun-Times in 1963.
Mr. von Hoffman proved to be a superb reporter and writer, covering civil rights in the South with vivid accounts of protests and racial violence.
Continue reading the main story
Once hired by The Post, he did not fit into regular news beats. But given the latitude of a column, he became Washington’s enfant terrible, attacking the Nixon administration over the war in Vietnam, violent police crackdowns on protesters at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, and President Richard M. Nixon’s taped Oval Office profanities as the Watergate scandal closed in, forcing his resignation in 1974.
Mr. Hoffman sounded the political death knell with a bitter irony.
“Nixon,” he wrote, “is going into the history books as the president who absent-mindedly didn’t mind having his people drop the Bill of Rights from the Constitution, but who was chased from office for public profanity. You commit treason but they get you for littering.”
He caricatured subjects with rapier cuts: Nixon “looks like he’s got lip cramps and a Charley horse in the cheek.” Attorney General John N. Mitchell, who helped plan the Watergate break-in, was “a Peeping Tom.” And in the Rev. Billy Graham “we can see the formal union of state, society and religion, the working partnership between God and Caesar, not rendering to each other so much as washing each other’s hands.”
“My approach to reporting is nothing new,” Mr. von Hoffman told Newsweek in 1969. “It’s no different than the methods used by people like Hearst, Pulitzer or Mencken. They certainly didn’t adhere to strict news objectivity. I think you’re mad if you come into journalism with the idea that you’re going to change things for the better. I write because I enjoy it. I sincerely believe in what I write, and I get a kick out of getting those Washington mossbacks angry.”



Photo

Mr. von Hoffman on a television studio set.CreditGeorge Tames/The New York Times 

He provoked more outraged letters to the editor than any writer in memory at The Post, said Chalmers M. Roberts, a longtime correspondent.
In 1970, Mr. von Hoffman raised a storm of protest with a column that referred to American prisoners of war in Vietnam as a political issue involving “just 1,500 men.” Angry letters from prisoners’ families and support groups flooded in; many were published, along with a Post editorial disagreeing with the column but defending the author’s right to his opinion.
“My life would have been a lot simpler had Nicholas von Hoffman not appeared in the paper,” the publisher, Katharine Graham, wrote in her 1997 memoir, “Personal History.” But, she added, “I firmly believed that he belonged at The Post.”
Mr. von Hoffman, a thickset man, sometimes let his prematurely gray hair get a bit long. But he hardly looked the part of a radical. He wore spectacles, dressed casually in sports jackets and jeans, smoked a pipe and looked cool, smiling and relaxed, even when caught up in a dispute on national television.
In the early 1970s, he became a familiar commentator on the CBS program “60 Minutes,” paired on the “Point/Counterpoint” segment with the conservative James J. KilpatrickDon Hewitt, the producer, fired Mr. von Hoffman in 1974 after he called Nixon, on the air, “a dead mouse on the kitchen floor that everyone was afraid to touch and throw in the garbage.”
Nicholas von Hoffman was born in New York City on Oct. 16, 1929, to Carl von Hoffman and the former Anna Bruenn. His father was an immigrant Russian cavalry officer. After graduating from Fordham Preparatory School in the Bronx in 1948, Nicholas went to Chicago, intending to enroll at Loyola University. Instead, he took a research job at the University of Chicago, and in 1954 joined Mr. Alinsky as a field organizer in black and Hispanic communities on the South Side.
His marriage to Ann C. Byrne in 1950 ended in divorce in 1968. She was also a social activist in Chicago and was later a dean at the University of Rhode Island. She died in 2015.
Besides Alexander, Mr. von Hoffman is survived by two other sons from his first marriage, Constantine and Aristo, and two grandchildren. A second marriage, to Patricia Bennett, also ended in divorce.
Mr. von Hoffman’s first book, “Mississippi Notebook” (1964), grew out of his civil rights coverage for The Sun-Times. Early on at The Post, on the education beat, he wrote a book, “Multiversity” (1966). In cultural affairs, he explored San Francisco’s hippie drug scene and wrote another book, “We Are the People Our Parents Warned Us Against” (1968).
Finally given latitude as a columnist, he hit his stride. At the 1969 trial of the Chicago Eight , the leftist radicals charged with inciting to riot at the Democratic National Convention the previous summer (they became the Chicago Seven after one defendant’s trial was severed), he depicted a theatrical parody of jurisprudence.



Photo

Mr. von Hoffman’s most successful book was his best-selling biography of Roy M. Cohn, the chief counsel to Senator Joseph R. McCarthy in his 1950s anti-communist crusades. CreditDoubleday 

The defendants were portrayed as part of the satire: Abbie Hoffman was the “street theater social critic,” David Dellinger was “the old-line pacifist-socialist who’s only recently dared to grow sideburns,” and Jerry Rubin was “a freelance wild man.” Judge Julius J. Hoffman, presiding at the trial, became “an aging Hobbit who never stops talking with the voice of a man reading horror stories to small children.”
Reporters for other news organizations could not convey Mr. von Hoffman’s absurdist view of the trial. “He has caught its tone and flavor in a way that has been almost impossible for those of us operating under tighter editorial restrictions,” said J. Anthony Lukas of The New York Times.
But even the more objective reporters found rare spectacles to write about: The Black Panther Party activist Bobby Seale, whose case was severed, called the judge “a fascist dog,” “a honky” and “a pig.” When he refused to be silenced, the judge ordered him bound and gagged in court. Two defendants, Mr. Rubin and Mr. Hoffman, appeared in court wearing judicial robes. They complied with an order to remove them, revealing Chicago police uniforms underneath.
After leaving The Post, Mr. Hoffman wrote syndicated freelance columns for King Features for decades. He also wrote book reviews and magazine articles for The Times and contributed to The New Republic, Esquire, Vogue, The Nation, Harper’s, The New York Review of Books and other publications.
He collaborated with the Doonesbury political cartoonist, Garry B. Trudeau, on two books, “The Fireside Watergate” (1973) and “Tales From the Margaret Mead Taproom” (1976). He also wrote two novels, “Two, Three, Many More” (1969), on the campus disruptions of the 1960s, and “Organized Crimes” (1984), about gangland Chicago in the Great Depression.
His most successful book was “Citizen Cohn,” which was on The Times’ best-seller lists for eight weeks in 1988 and inspired a 1992 movie of the same title starring James Woods. Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, in a review for The Times, called the biography a “richer, more rounded, better balanced view” than Sidney Zion’s contemporaneous book, “The Autobiography of Roy Cohn,” based on interviews with Mr. Cohn, who died in 1986.
Mr. von Hoffman broadcast 250 commentaries on public affairs in the 1980s for the syndicated Cato Institute radio program “Byline.” From 1993 to 2008, he wrote columns for the weekly newspaper The New York Observer, and from 1996 to 2007 he contributed to Architectural Digest.
He also wrote for The Huffington Post, and composed the libretto for Deborah Drattell’s 2003 production of “Nicholas and Alexandra” by the Los Angeles Opera.
Mr. von Hoffman also wrote “Hoax: Why Americans Are Suckered by White House Lies,” (2004), and “Radical: A Portrait of Saul Alinsky” (2010), based on his recollections of his years working as a community organizer with Mr. Alinsky.
Another of his mentors, Benjamin C. Bradlee, the executive editor of The Post, offered perhaps the highest praise for his former reporter and columnist, calling Mr. von Hoffman’s work “landmarks in the early, timid years of the new journalism: personal, pertinent, articulate, vital glimpses of man trying to make it in a more complicated world.”



Q&A: Nicholas von Hoffman Video by C-SPAN



From Reason:



Farewell to Nicholas von Hoffman, the Newsman Who Got Fired for Comparing Nixon to a Dead Mouse

Friday A/V Club: Columnist, broadcaster, and critic of concentrated power


Nicholas von Hoffman died yesterday. He was 88 years old and he wasn't that famous anymore, but he used to be all over the media: He had a Washington Post column that was syndicated across the country, he recorded radio commentaries for the CBS show Spectrum, and he had a recurring gig doing point/counterpoint segments for 60 Minutes, speaking for the left while James Kilpatrick represented the right. He was fired from that last job after the night he compared Richard Nixon to a dead mouse on a kitchen floor. "The question," he said of the president, "is who is going to pick it up by the tail and drop it in the trash. At this point it makes no difference whether he resigns, thereby depositing himself in a sanitary container, or whether Congress scoops him up in the dustpan of impeachment. But as an urgent national health measure, we've got to get that decomposing political corpse out of the White House."
I'm trying to think of the last time von Hoffman had a big moment of public notoriety. It was probably in 2001, when Andrew Sullivan started handing out a sarcastic "Von Hoffman Award" for "stunningly wrong political, social and cultural predictions." The columnist had earned the honor by writing skeptically about the then-young war in Afghanistan—he had said the U.S. was "fighting blind" and "distracted by gusts of wishful thinking." What a nut, right? After a few years, an abashed Sullivan confessed that von Hoffman had had a point, and he renamed the prize for Dick Morris.
Von Hoffman got his start as an activist, not a journalist, and in the '50s he was a lieutenant of sorts to the Chicago-based organizer Saul Alinsky. (My review of Radical, von Hoffman's memoir of his Alinsky days, is here.) From there he drifted into reporting, filing lively dispatches for the Chicago Daily News and then The Washington Post. He wrote sympathetically about the counterculture and the civil rights movement, unsympathetically about Nixon and the Vietnam War; he developed a reputation as the Post's in-house New Leftist. And that he was, more or less. But like the more anarchistic New Left types—and like his old boss Alinsky—von Hoffman didn't have much faith in big government.


By the early 1970s, when he had his newspaper column and his 60 Minutes job, that distrust sometimes led him to unexpected positions. Take the time he devoted a column to the notion that the John Birch Society offers a useful "corrective to our thinking." (When they denounce Nixon or the Fed, he wrote, they start "talking about the uses of power, money and politics in ways we can learn from.") He still kept the Birchers at arm's length, naturally. But he didn't add any caveats in 1971 when he wrote a piece praising the foreign policy views of the isolationist Ohio senator Robert Taft. After quoting extensively from a speech the late Republican had given two decades earlier, von Hoffman announced that Taft was "right on every question all the way from inflation to the terrible demoralization of troops."
Von Hoffman also wrote several '70s articles applauding the ideas of Louis Kelso, an apostle of employee ownership. That might sound more like what you'd expect from a New Left writer—worker power!—except that both Kelso and von Hoffman presented the proposal not as an alternative to capitalism but as a more radical form of it. When Henry Fairlie read some of those dispatches, he threw up his hands and complained that von Hoffman "parades himself as a radical" but wants "to make everyone a capitalist."
And then there was his column about the libertarian economist Murray Rothbard. It didn't endorse the full ancap program, but it did embrace the most radical part of it. "One of Rothbard's best, new ideas is to shut down the police departments of America," he enthused. As von Hoffman expounded on this notion, he started to sound like an anarchist Mike Royko:"As almost anybody who's tried to call a cop knows, they are next to useless. About the only way you can get one is to tell the operator at headquarters a cop is being murdered. Then they'll come. If you tell her that you're the one being murdered, you'd best hope your killer is a slow sadist who'll take three-quarters of an hour to polish you off." If you didn't have to pay taxes or bribes to the police, he continued, you could spend that money on private guards or start your own citizens' patrol; and if you couldn't afford to do that, well, at least you'd have the cops off your back.
When Reason interviewed von Hoffman in 1976, he denied that he held any sort of well-developed political philosophy. ("Saul never made any attempts at internal consistency," he said of Alinsky. "I followed that brilliant intellectual tradition.") He certainly didn't claim to be a libertarian: While he knew big business uses the regulatory agencies to create cartels, for example, he told Reason that he still thought regulation could be a check on corporate power. But he was happy to write the occasional kindly column about the Libertarian Party and to have the Cato Institute publish his articles in Inquiryand air his commentaries on its radio show Byline. Toward the end of his life, von Hoffman contributed gladly to both The Nation and The American Conservative. He was an eclectic skeptic; a journalist, not a philosopher. He liked libertarians because they seemed idealistic and anti-authoritarian. Libertarians liked him because he cast a jaundiced eye at anyone in power, and because he skewered those powerful people entertainingly.
And that brings us to my favorite von Hoffman book, Make-Believe Presidents, which roasts everyone from Herbert Hoover to the Kennedys. I recommend reading it in conjunction with Gene Healy's The Cult of the Presidency. They're an odd couple—Healy's book, published in 2008, posits that the presidency is too powerful, while von Hoffman's, published 30 years earlier, argues that presidents aren't nearly as powerful as we think. But the books complement each other rather well. Make-Believe Presidents catalogs countless ways we've been abused by executive power: wars, repression, foolish regulatory schemes. It just doesn't give the presidents enough respect to trust their assurances that they're in charge. The "growth and elaboration of the mega-institution," it argues, "pushed, drove, controlled, and guided presidents as much as it did lesser people." Executive power was larger than the executive.
The two videos below show von Hoffman promoting Make-Believe Presidents on a Chicago TV show. (The end of the interview is missing, alas.) They're fun to watch, and though it's 40 years later they still sometimes feel resonant. Presidents "all come in the first day in the Oval Office, they look at this wonderful desk, they see all these buttons, they start hitting them," the writer says. "Nothing happens. And finally they look under the desk and they see all the wires have been cut." Then he grins.


(For the full text of Make-Believe Presidents, go here. For Reason's review of the book, written by Karl Hess, go here. For Reason's review of another von Hoffman book, go here. For an hour's worth of von Hoffman's CBS radio commentaries, go here. For past editions of the Friday A/V Club, go here.)
CORRECTION: This post originally stated that von Hoffman worked for The Chicago Sun-Times before he joined the Post; in fact, it was the Chicago Daily News.
Photo Credit: Pantheon





    BLESS HIS (LITTLE) HEART: House Speaker Paul Ryan celebrated the tax cut with a tweet about a secretary saving $1.50 a week (WaPo)

    $
    0
    0
    MEMO TO ALL MANCHURIAN CANDIDATES: YOU OWN THIS TAX CUT,  REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES.   In the immortal words of former U.S. Senator Gary Warren Hart (D-Colo.), "You won't get the government off your backs until you get your hands out of its pockets."

    Me-PUBLICANS are fun to watch!

    Last week, St. Johns County Republican Executive Committee TRUMP CLUB Chair and Second Vice Chair DIANCE SCHERFF emitted a fatwa, an unctuous ukase,  a litmus test:
    REC has announced it will support only  "PRO TRUMP" clones and drones as local and state candidates.

    Thus, assume all of its Manchurian Candidates want to pick your pockets.

    The presumption is well-nigh irrefragable and irrefutable.  MePublican Candidates are "pro-business" wrecking crew.  They unquestioningly support Rich White Trash President DONALD JOHN TRUMP.

    Fun to watch all the flummery, dupery and nincompoopery from the  "House of Hoar* and the "Home of the Whopper"(R)."

    Voters: reject the nasty, noisome, nattering, narcissistic ninnies and boobies.

    Vote for Democrats and against local state and federal MePublicans whose leader bragged about their $1.50/weekly tax cuts for a school secretaries.

    Oink!


    -----
    * St. Johns County Republican political boss DAVID SHOAR, High Sheriff, legally changed his name from "HOAR" in 1994.








    Paul Ryan celebrated the tax cut with a tweet about a secretary saving $1.50 a week

      



     1:58
    Ryan: 'Tax reform is boosting the economy'
    Never mind all the Democrats who call the GOP’s tax bill a deficit-busting giveaway to the rich; House Speaker Paul D. Ryan has been enthusiastically promoting it as a middle-class tax windfall.
    He’s been coaching other Republican lawmakers to sell the $1.5 trillion tax cut to voters, and telling people on Twitter to check their paychecks for wage hikes. The bill — which was deeply unpopular when it passed along party lines in December — is now breaking even in a new opinion poll.
    So Saturday morning, by way of good news, Ryan’s Twitter account shared a story about a secretary taking home a cool $6 a month in tax savings.
    Here is the passage in the Associated Press:
    Julia Ketchum, a secretary at a public high school in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, said she was pleasantly surprised her pay went up $1.50 a week. She didn’t think her pay would go up at all, let alone this soon. That adds up to $78 a year, which she said will more than cover her Costco membership for the year.
    The tweet was deleted within hours, probably guaranteeing it will never be forgotten, and leaving people baffled as to why Ryan ever thought it would make a good advertisement for the tax plan’s supposed middle-class benefit.
    It’s true that the bill is stingy to people at the bottom of the pay scale. In fact, the average tax break for someone making $25,400 a year or less happens to be $60 — the exact price of a Gold Star Costco membership.
    ADVERTISING
    And it's true that the bill showers money on those in the top income brackets. But between these extremes, millions of workers should see substantial cuts, ranging into the hundreds and thousands of dollars.
    For example, the very same AP story Ryan quoted from also cited a care worker in Florida who got an extra $200 in his last paycheck, and a couple in Texas who will save enough to cover the costs of a new baby. Why the House Speaker decided to highlight Julia Ketchum of Lancaster, Pa., and her $1.50 a week savings, the world may never know.

    Neither Ryan’s office nor Ketchum could be reached for comment. But in an interview with CBS News, the school secretary also wondered why Ryan had chosen her anecdote of all possible examples. "He may not have read the whole article," she said.
    Not that hundreds of people dragging Ryan over his tweet seem that interested in finding out. The most common responses can be placed into three neat categories, below:
    Open mockery of Ryan



    Posting illustrations of how little money $1.50 is

    There are more like this, but you get the idea.
    Comparing $1.50 to large amounts of money in the same tax bill, and not in a good way

    While it's hard to be sure, since President Trump refuses to release his income tax records, The Washington Post has written that he stands to save millions of dollars through the bill he promoted and signed.
    Millions of dollars compares very favorably against $1.50 a week, as people on Twitter are now discovering.

    Likewise $1.50 vs. $500,000 — the latter amount being what GOP financier Charles Koch and his wife reported donated to Ryan’s fundraising committee days after the tax bill passed.

    Finally, $1.50 compared poorly against the untold government programs, staff or resources that will have to be cut in the future to pay for those hundreds of thousands of dollars in savings.

    All of which is to say that even if Ryan’s tweet was only up for a few hours, jokes aside, it could end up haunting Republicans in the November election. Democrats have already figured this out.

    This story has been updated.
    Read more:
    subscribe
    The story must be told.
    Your subscription supports journalism that matters.

    The Scariest Catholic in America (NY Times)

    $
    0
    0
    Openly Gay New York Times columnist Frank Bruni about Jesuit priest James Martin, S.J. and his being assailed by Catholics from what my mother once called "the manic-depressive wing of the Catholic Church."

    Our City of St. Augustine was found by Pedro Menendez de Aviles.  In 1566, Menendez Florida's first Governor, ordered a Gay French interpreter of the Guale Indian language, terming him a "Sodomite and a Lutheran." 

    These right-wing Catholics are using the same word ("Sodomite") and attacking their Gay brothers and sisters.  Shameful.  To those so-called "Catholics," as one of the judges of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals once told counsel for Georgetown University, "Try tolerance.'

    Here's Frank Bruni's column:




    Photo

    CreditBen Wiseman 

    The Rev. James Martin is a Roman Catholic rock star. His books, including one on Jesus Christ and another on the saints, have sold hundreds of thousands of copies. The director Martin Scorsese has twice hired him to consult on movies with religious themes. Television producers love him: Back when Stephen Colbert had his Comedy Central show, Father Martin popped up frequently as its “official chaplain.”
    So the reaction when he agreed to speak this month to a group of parishes in central New Jersey was unalloyed elation, right?
    Wrong. Within days of the announcement, parish officials were in a state better described as dread.
    Check out the websites and Twitter accounts of far-right Catholic groups and you’ll see why. To them Father Martin is “sick,” “wicked,” “a filthy liar,” “the smoke of Satan” and a “heretic” on a fast track to “eternal damnation.” They obsessively stalk him and passionately exhort churchgoers to protest his public appearances or prevent them from happening altogether.
    And they succeed. After the New Jersey parish in which his remarks were supposed to be delivered was inundated with angry phone calls, the event was moved off church grounds. Father Martin will give his spectacularly uncontroversial talk — “Jesus Christ: Fully Human, Fully Divine” — at a secular conference center in a nearby town.
    Why all this drama? What’s Father Martin’s unconscionable sin? In his most recent book, “Building a Bridge,” which was published in June, he calls on Catholics to show L.G.B.T. people more respect and compassion than many of them have demonstrated in the past.
    Continue reading the main story
    That’s all. That’s it. He doesn’t say that the church should bless gay marriage or gay adoption. He doesn’t explicitly reject church teaching, which prescribes chastity for gay men and lesbians, though he questions the language — “intrinsically disordered” — with which it describes homosexuality.

    Photo

    The Rev. James Martin. CreditDavid Gonzalez/The New York Times 

    But that hasn’t stopped his detractors from casting him as a terrifying enemy of the faith — Regan in “The Exorcist” and Damien in “The Omen” rolled together and grown up into a balding and bespectacled Jesuit — and silencing him whenever they can. A talk about Jesus that he was supposed to give in London last fall was canceled. So was a similar talk at the Theological College of the Catholic University of America.
    And the vitriol to which he has been subjected is breathtaking, a reminder not just of how much homophobia is still out there but also of how presumptuous, overwrought, cruel and destructive discourse in this digital age can be.
    “Inexcusably ugly” was how the Roman Catholic archbishop of Philadelphia, Charles Chaput, described the attacks on Father Martin in an essay for the Catholic journal First Things in September. Archbishop Chaput is no progressive, but still he was moved to write that “the bitterness directed at the person of Father Martin is not just unwarranted and unjust; it’s a destructive counter-witness to the Gospel.” He cited a recent article in a French publication with the headline “Catholic Cyber-Militias and the New Censorship,” observing, “We live at a time when civility is universally longed for and just as universally (and too often gleefully) violated.”
    After Bishop Robert McElroy of San Diego published a similar defense of Father Martin in the Jesuit magazine America, one of Father Martin’s devoted inquisitors tweeted: “If you think the anti-sodomite bigotry in the church is bad, you should see hell.”
    I spoke with Bishop McElroy recently, and he said that while there are calm-voiced critics of Father Martin with earnest concerns about what they see as the church’s drift from traditional sexual morality, there are also out-and-out bigots whose methods are “incompatible with what we hope to be as a church.”
    “We have to face the fact that there is a group of people across all religious views that are particularly antagonistic to L.G.B.T. people,” he told me. “That comes from deep within the human soul, and it’s really corrosive and repugnant.”
    I have known Father Martin for many years and have long been struck by the painstakingly careful balance that he maintains. Is he telling his fellow Catholics to judge L.G.B.T. people less harshly, whether they’re chaste or not? Absolutely. When he and I talked a few days ago, he repeated a recommendation in “Building a Bridge” that Catholic institutions stop firing gay people, which has happened repeatedly.
    “Straight couples do not have their sexual lives put under a microscope like that, nor are they targeted,” he told me. “A couple living together before they’re married aren’t fired from a Catholic school.” But that arrangement runs as afoul of church teaching as a sexually active gay or lesbian couple’s does.
    From listening to Father Martin, it’s certainly possible to conclude that, or at least wonder if, he has qualms with church teaching about homosexuality. But he’s so restrained and respectful that the president of the Jesuit Conference of Canada and the United States officially approved “Building a Bridge,” which has also been endorsed by an array of prominent cardinals and bishops.
    And he trails behind many members of his faith in his publicly stated views. According to a poll by the Pew Research Center last June, 67 percent of Americans who identify as Catholic support the legalization of same-sex marriage, in contrast to 62 percent of Americans across the board.
    But the far right isn’t quietly ceding the fight. That’s clear not only in the response to Father Martin but also in a federal education bill, drafted by Republicans, that would protect colleges that ban openly gay relationships or bar gays from certain religious organizations on campus.
    And in the church as in the government, the scorched-earth tactics of ultraconservatives often gives them a sway disproportionate to their actual numbers. “These online hate groups are now more powerful than local churches,” Father Martin said, referring specifically to Church Militant and to the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property, which started a petition demanding that the New Jersey parishes cancel his appearance. It gathered 12,000 signatures.
    Lyle Garcia, 72, one of the parishioners involved in the decision to invite Father Martin, admitted to me that he was “very concerned” that in changing the location of the event, they’d rewarded and emboldened the haters. But at least, he said, the talk would proceed.

    As will Father Martin. An expanded edition of “Building a Bridge” will be published in March, and it includes material about L.G.B.T. Catholics who told him, as he promoted the book, that it had given them desperately needed comfort.
    “I’m at total peace,” he told me. “I really am. An ocean of hate online is really wiped out by just a few tears from an L.G.B.T. person.” Only one thing to say to that: Amen.

    Continue reading the main story

    Payday Rules Relax on Trump’s Watch After Lobbying by Lenders (NY Times)

    $
    0
    0
    Corrupt TRUMP Administration trying to undo low-income consumer rights protections. Despicable. Notice where their cartel meeting is taking place in April? One of TRUMP's country clubs.




    Photo

    Mick Mulvaney, the White House budget director and the acting head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, has taken a more hands-off approach to the payday lending industry.CreditAl Drago for The New York Times 

    WASHINGTON — In mid-April, hundreds of members of the payday lending industry will head to Florida for their annual retreat featuring golf and networking at a plush resort just outside Miami. The resort just happens to be the Trump National Doral Golf Club.
    It will cap a year in which the industry has gone from villain to victor, the result of a concentrated lobbying campaign that has culminated in the Trump administration’s loosening regulatory grip on payday lenders and a far friendlier approach by the industry’s nemesis, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
    Gone is Richard Cordray, the consumer bureau’s director and so-called bad cop, who levied fines and brought lawsuits to crack down on usurious business practices by an industry that offers short-term, high-interest loans that critics say trap vulnerable consumers in a feedback loop of debt. In his place is Mick Mulvaney, the White House budget director and a former South Carolina congressman, who was chosen by President Trump to assume temporary control of the bureau and has emerged as something of a white knight for the payday lending industry.
    “I think now we’re in a period that is relatively passive,” said Dennis Shaul, the chief executive of the Community Financial Services Association of America, the primary lobbying group for payday lenders. “I think it is advisable for us to largely draw a curtain on the past and try to go forward.”
    Two weeks ago, Mr. Mulvaney put the brakes on a contentious rule, ushered in by Mr. Cordray, that was set to impose tight restrictions on short-term payday loans. He ended a case that the bureau initiated last year against a group of payday lenders in Kansas accused of charging interest rates of nearly 1,000 percent. Last week, Mr. Mulvaney scrapped an investigation into the marketing and lending practices of World Acceptance Corporation, a lender based in South Carolina that donated $4,500 to Mr. Mulvaney’s previous congressional campaigns through its political action committee.
    Continue reading the main story
    According to the Center for Responsive Politics, payday lenders have contributed more than $13 million to members of Congress since 2010, with the majority of that money going to Republicans who have made it a priority to roll back the financial regulations put in place by President Barack Obama after the financial crisis. That includes Mr. Mulvaney, who received nearly $63,000 for his campaigns from payday lending groups.
    Mr. Mulvaney said that the donations were not an issue “because I am not in elected office anymore.”
    The payday lending industry is cheering Mr. Mulvaney’s approach.
    “He seems extremely reasonable,” said W. Allan Jones, a founder of one of the industry’s top lobbying groups who operates about 900 payday lending stores across the country. “He’s figured this thing out that they’ve overstepped their bounds.”
    Mr. Jones, the chief executive of the Tennessee-based Check Into Cash chain of payday lenders, has been scaling back his payday loan empire in recent years. He laid off about 300 employees last year, bringing his work force to about 3,000. This year he plans to shutter 100 more stores, despite the changes happening at the consumer bureau, because it remains unclear how far the move to deregulate the industry will go and because state lending laws have become increasingly strict.

    Photo

    The payday lending industry will hold its annual retreat in April at the Trump National Doral Golf Club just outside Miami. CreditJoe Raedle/Getty Images 

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was born out of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, immediately seized on the payday lending industry as one of its first targets, opening a complaint database, initiating investigations, filing lawsuits and formulating rules to prevent lenders from preying on consumers. According to the consumer agency, it has pursued more than 20 public enforcement actions against small-dollar lenders, many of which have resulted in large settlements.
    The crackdown has had an effect. According to data from the Center for Financial Services Information, annual payday lending revenue dropped to $5.3 billion in 2017, from $9.2 billion in 2012. The number of payday loan stores dropped from a peak of 24,043 in 2007, to 16,480 in 2015, according to a recent report published by the consumer bureau.
    The industry has long been a presence on Capitol Hill, but it spied an opening after Mr. Trump’s election and the Republican takeover of Congress. The industry pushed lawmakers to repeal the consumer bureau’s 2017 payday lending rule by using the Congressional Review Act to essentially kill it. A bipartisan group of lawmakers has sponsored such a resolution, though its viability remains uncertain. Since Mr. Trump’s election, the payday lending lobby has also made its voice heard at the consumer bureau, flooding the agency with comments expressing opposition to the payday rule.
    And lenders have poured money into the coffers of influential Republican lawmakers. Lobbying donations peaked in 2012, when the bureau began to make payday lending a priority and have leveled off in the last year. Among the biggest recipients have been Representative Jeb Hensarling of Texas, the Republican chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Senator Mike Crapo of Idaho, the Republican chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.
    In December, Mr. Hensarling, who has long accused the consumer bureau of overreach, said that “no unelected Washington bureaucrat” should be able to stop Americans from taking out the short-term loan that they wanted.
    Payday lenders have also looked for inroads with the president. A lender based in Ohio, Community Choice Financial, was one of the first clients of Corey Lewandowski, Mr. Trump’s first campaign manager, who started a Washington consulting business last year. Over the summer, Mr. Lewandowski called on Mr. Trump in a television interview to fire Mr. Cordray.
    In the spring, the industry will spend four days networking at the Trump National Doral Golf Club, which has event spaces like the Donald J. Trump Grand Ballroom and the Ivanka Trump Ballroom. Mr. Shaul said his group began looking at the Trump property as a potential site for its spring meeting well before the 2016 presidential election and ultimately chose it because it was cheaper than other East Coast resorts.
    “We began an analysis well ahead of Trump’s election,” Mr. Shaul said, adding that the decision had not been entirely well received by members. “There’s quite a division of people who thought this is not a good thing to do and those who did.”
    “We aren’t ashamed of it either,” he said of the decision. “We made it largely on economic terms.”
    The payday industry is just one of many groups holding events at Trump properties in the wake of the election. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is holding an event for “an elite group” of its members at the Trump National Doral in March, according to its website.

    Photo

    Richard Cordray, the former director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau who is running for governor of Ohio, spent much of his tenure at the agency tightening rules on the payday lending industry. CreditJohn Minchillo/Associated Press 

    To consumer advocates, the defanging of the consumer bureau is the epitome of pay-to-play.
    “They aggressively lobby against anything that goes against the debt trap nature of their business model,” said Diane Standaert, the director of state policy at the Center for Responsible Lending. “It’s been fierce.”
    Consumer advocates and Democrats say they are worried that the industry’s lobbying will backfire by allowing less reputable payday lenders to prey on the most vulnerable Americans — the exact people Mr. Trump vowed to protect.
    “Payday lenders are clearly watching this with bated breath,” said José Alcoff, manager of the Stop the Debt Trap campaign at Americans for Financial Reform. “I think this is clearly a case where the system is getting more and more rigged, where they have, as they say, the fox in charge of the henhouse.”
    Watching the transition from afar has also not been easy for Mr. Cordray, who has taken to Twitter of late to express his outrage over the new direction of the bureau. Now a Democratic candidate for governor of Ohio, Mr. Cordray said he was stunned by how swiftly his successor tried to undo the bureau’s work. He warns that Mr. Mulvaney’s actions were misguided.
    “I’m surprised to see any efforts aggressively to roll back efforts to rein in payday lending, because we had done extensive research on how these loans lead many people into debt traps that ruin their financial lives,” Mr. Cordray said.
    Mr. Cordray remained hopeful that after reviewing the consumer complaint data, Mr. Mulvaney could come to see some of the value in rigorous oversight of payday lenders.
    So far, that seems unlikely. In a memo last month to the bureau’s staff, Mr. Mulvaney made clear that he would be shifting the priorities of the agency to take into account the business impact of rules. He cited statistics that showed payday lending represents a sliver of total consumer complaints, signaling that the industry would not be a priority.
    Payday lenders and their lobbyists say the industry supports regulation but said the previous approach was stifling lending to people who need help.
    “This product is demand driven,” Mr. Shaul said. “It isn’t that people met in the middle of the night to say let’s put together a payday loan and see how it does.”
    Mr. Shaul added that the payday lobby was not trying to buy off lawmakers or please the president.
    “$65,000 over five or six years for Mulvaney?” he said. “That’s not a hell of a lot of influence on an annual basis.”
    Continue reading the main story

    What It May Take to Strike a Segregationist’s Name From a Georgia Bridge: Hundreds of Girl Scouts (NY Times)

    $
    0
    0
    Georgia Governor Eugene Talmadge was a white supremacist Klansman, whose evildoing was exposed by my late mentor Stetson Kennedy in his books. The Savannah bridge was never named properly for Talmadge. It's only fair to name the Savannah bridge for someone much more deserving of the honor, like the founder of the Girl Scouts of America.



    Photo
    The Eugene Talmadge Memorial Bridge in Savannah, Ga. An effort is underway to name the bridge for the founder of the Girl Scouts, Juliette Gordon Low. CreditRuss Bynum/Associated Press 
    SAVANNAH, Ga. — The bridge that carries Highway 17 into Savannah is hard to miss: Its H-shaped towers are among the tallest structures for miles. But many people in the city would like never to lay eyes again on the green and white signs that say the span honors the segregationist former Gov. Eugene Talmadge.
    “We would never take the worst parts of his speeches and put them up on big billboards over the bridge and say, ‘Well, welcome to Savannah, here’s what we stand for,’ ” said Stan Deaton, senior historian at the Georgia Historical Society, which is based here. “But having his name on that bridge is tantamount to doing so.”
    Residents of Savannah have been trying for decades to get the state to rename it, only to see their efforts sputter and die in the back rooms and boardrooms of Atlanta, the capital.
    But this year is different, and state lawmakers could vote in the coming weeks to give the bridge a less controversial name. And it all may be because of two new factors in the equation: a bit of legal detective work and the Girl Scouts, hundreds of whom are planning to descend on the Capitol this week to argue that the bridge should celebrate Juliette Gordon Low, the Savannah native who founded their organization.
    “Ms. Juliette was really influential in changing the public’s opinion on women, and how women can do whatever they set their minds to, and that girls can also grow and learn to be their own independent person,” said Sydnie Roberds, 15, in an interview at the group’s first headquarters on Drayton Street here.
    The scouts, including Sydnie, will hold a milk-and-cookies reception at the Capitol on Tuesday, when Ron Stephens, a Republican state representative from Savannah, is expected to introduce a proposal to name the bridge for Ms. Low. To bolster their efforts, the Girl Scouts have also hired a lobbyist (a former scout herself) to help make their case in Atlanta.
    In a region known for painful battles over monuments to controversial historical figures, even the persuasive power of Tagalongs and Thin Mints might not win the day, though, except for a recently uncovered quirk of history. It seems that lawyers have found no proof in state records that the formalities of naming the bridge were ever completed. So, technically, it may not have been the Eugene Talmadge Memorial Bridge in the first place.
    “We hope that it’s going to be a naming, not a renaming,” Mr. Stephens said. “If this bridge never had a name, and we’re going to name it, that argument about us changing the name falls by the wayside.”
    Unlike the Confederate leaders whose memorials have become flash points across the Deep South, Mr. Talmadge, a Democrat, is a figure of the fairly recent past. He died in 1946, shortly before he was to begin a fourth term as governor; four of the state’s six living governors were alive for at least part of his tenure in office.
    His white supremacist views and staunch segregationism make for a troubling legacy. For example, he vowed to purge the state university system of any employee who supported “Negroes in the same schools with white folks in Georgia,” a stand that helped cost the state’s white colleges their accreditation. He staged an electoral comeback with a pledge to restore all-white primary elections. He used martial law to wage political turf battles, and he was implicated in corruption.
    None of that stopped the state from naming a bridge over the Savannah River for Mr. Talmadge in the 1950s, when his son Herman Talmadge was governor. By the 1980s, that cantilever-truss bridge was posing problems for large new container ships headed for the Port of Savannah. So the state replaced it in 1991 with the cable-stayed bridge that appears in so many postcards and snapshots today — and kept on using the Talmadge name, perhaps out of no more than habit.
    And that, Mr. Stephens said, could create the opening for state lawmakers to give the bridge a new name, unburdened by having to formally remove the old one
    "For whatever reason, there is a huge resistance for us to start doing that, and making those changes at a later time,” said Mr. Stephens, who has sat in the Legislature through years of arguments over the Confederate symbols on the state flag.
    If officials do find proof that the 1991 bridge was formally named, any proposal to change it will be “dead in the water,” he said, but “as long as you’re not talking about a renaming, I’m not running into resistance at all.” (Natalie Dale, a spokeswoman for the Georgia Department of Transportation, whose board had the power to name bridges until 2002, said Friday that formal action to name the new bridge in 1991 had not been necessary.)
    Gov. Nathan Deal’s office did not respond to a request for comment on the bridge issue, nor did members of the Talmadge family. Over the years, lawmakers said, Mr. Talmadge’s relatives have warned legislators against altering the name of the bridge.
    Kaleb McMichen, a spokesman for the state House speaker, David Ralston, a Republican, said it would be “premature to comment” before a bill is formally introduced, but that it “would be considered through the normal committee process like any other bill.”
    Juliette Gordon Low is not the only option on the table. Others have proposed naming the bridge for James Oglethorpe, who founded Georgia as a colony; for Clarence Thomas, the United States Supreme Court associate justice, who was raised in Savannah; or for Tomochichi, a Native American chief who aided the early European settlers. When the Savannah City Council voted in September to declare that Talmadge was “not a reflection of modern Georgia,” it said the bridge should simply be called the Savannah Bridge.
    And some people in Savannah, with its graceful historic district of Spanish moss and serene squares, have voiced concerns about honoring Ms. Low, because of the Girl Scouts’ record on race. The 105-year-old organization allowed black participants early on, but it did not charter its first predominantly African-American troop south of the Mason-Dixon Line until 1932, five years after Ms. Low’s death, according to the National Park Service.
    The organization’s jump into the politics of bridge-naming came less than a year after the Boy Scouts were criticized for the tenor of President Trump’s speech at a national scout gathering, which veered sharply into partisan politics.
    The Girl Scouts say their lobbying effort advances the organization’s goal of teaching young people about civic engagement. “We did not take any action until the City of Savannah took action,” said Sylvia Acevedo, the group’s national chief executive. “The City of Savannah wanted to change the name. Where we came in is, ‘Hey, you want to change the name? We believe very strongly that a great name would be Juliette Gordon Low Bridge.’ ”
    To some in Savannah, though, the choice of new name matters less than removing the old one. And there is some hope, if not always an expectation, that the issue will be settled soon.
    “They could name it for Herschel Walker for all I care, or Vince Dooley,” said Dr. Deaton, the historian, referring to two University of Georgia sports heroes. “But at this point, if they named it for Bear Bryant, I wouldn’t care.”
    Continue reading the main story

    MORE FINANCIAL FLUMMERY FROM ST. JOHNS COUNTY SHERIFF DAVID SHOAR (HCN)(updated)

    $
    0
    0
    UPDATE:  Proposal was modified to be legal at the February 6, 2018 County Commission meeting, where Sheriff DAVID SHOAR did not deign to appear.
    Again:
    Thanks to government watchdog Tom Reynolds, Historic City News and Michael Gold for blowing the whistle on St. Johns County Sheriff DAVID SHOAR's latest financial chicanery:

    UNJUST STEWARDS AND FELLOW HOGS AT THE TROUGH: St. Johns County Administrator MICHAEL DAVID WANCHICK (left) shakes hands and massages the right elbow of right-wing St. Johns County Sheriff DAVID BERNARD SHOAR, who legally changed his name from "HOAR" in 1994.

    Historic City News:


    Sheriff attempts misappropriation of law enforcement funds


    Historic City News learned Friday that St Johns County Sheriff David B. Shoar has apparently attempted to misappropriate $10,000.00 in public funds making a material misstatement that the use of those funds by a third-party organization complies with the requirements of state law.  To further conceal the misappropriation sought by the sheriff, the request appears only on the “consent agenda”; recommended by administrative staff for approval without public comment or board discussion.
    The Sheriff’s Office is requesting an expenditure from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund in the amount of $10,000.00 to support a local and non-profit organization, “Forward March, Inc.” in its efforts to “assist veterans in need” throughout the community.  This is the private group restoring the American Legion building located on the Bayfront at Anderson Circle.  The board of directors largely consists of Shoar’s political campaign supporters, financial contributors, and cronies from his past relationship with the Florida National Guard.  They are NOT a law enforcement agency or perform a law enforcement mission for the community.
    For the Tuesday morning meeting of the St Johns County Commission, Assistant County Administrator, Joy Andrews, wrote “Forward March, Inc. is a non-profit 501(c)(3) founded for the specific purpose of supporting the increasing public awareness of and the growing interest in the historic heritage of the greater St. Augustine, Florida area through educational programs and charitable activities” — NOT a law enforcement purpose.
    Andrews’ suggested motion and recommendation reads, “Motion to transfer $10,000 from Law Enforcement Trust Fund Reserves to support Forward March, Inc. in its efforts to assist veterans in need throughout the community.”  — NOT a law enforcement purpose.
    Sections 932.701-932.706, F.S., comprise the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, which provides for the seizure and civil forfeiture of property related to criminal and non-criminal violations of law.  The proceeds from forfeitures shall be deposited in a special law enforcement trust fund established by the Board of County Commissioners.
    According to 932.7055, F.S., titled, “Disposition of liens and forfeited property”, such proceeds and interest earned therefrom shall be used for:
    ·       school resource officer program
    ·       crime prevention program
    ·       safe neighborhood program
    ·       drug abuse education and prevention programs
    ·       other law enforcement purposes
    ·       defraying the cost of protracted or complex investigations
    ·       providing additional equipment or expertise
    ·       purchasing automated external defibrillators for law enforcement vehicles
    ·       providing matching funds to obtain federal grants
    At issue is a letter addressed to Chairman Dean, submitted by Shoar in his official capacity as sheriff, which states:
    SUBJECT: LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST FUND
    Dear Chairman Dean,
    The Sheriff’s Office is requesting expenditures from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund in the amount of $10,000.00. The funds will be used for the support of a local and non-profit organization, Forward March, INC. and will be dedicated to assisting veterans in needthroughout our community.
    Should the Board approve this expenditure, it is in compliance with Florida Statute 932.7055. Once funding is approved, the invoice will be paid and all proper documentation will be presented to Mr. Allen MacDonald for reimbursement.
    Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. Please do not hesitate to contact me should I be able to provide additional assistance or information.
    Sincerely,
    David B. Shoar
    Sheriff
    Shoar specifically represents, “Should the Board approve this expenditure, it is in compliance with Florida Statute 932.7055.”  Since the money is not being used by the St Johns County Sheriff’s Office, and Shoar simply intends to give it away to his friends, Forward March, Inc. must apply to the sheriff for an appropriation and its application shall be accompanied by a written certification that the moneys will be used for an authorized purpose, from a somewhat more restricted list.
    When used by an agency or organization, other than the seizing agency, such funds may be used only for:
    ·       school resource officer,
    ·       crime prevention,
    ·       safe neighborhood,
    ·       drug abuse education,
    ·       drug prevention programs
    ·       other law enforcement purposes
    Although a cause supported by Sheriff Shoar, “assisting veterans in need throughout the community” is NOT an authorized purpose specified in the Florida Statutes.  For Shoar to tell the Chairman and elected members of the Board of Commissioners that it is, puts them all in jeopardy of violating the law based on Shoar’s false and misleading representation.
    Further, an agency or organization that receives money pursuant to this subsection shall provide an accounting for such moneys and shall furnish the same reports as an agency of the county that receives public funds.
    The meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. in the County Auditorium located at 500 San Sebastian View.  Readers who wish to express themselves on this or other matters may address the commission at that time.  Public Comments are one of the first orders of business on the agenda, so come early if you wish to speak.




    Historic City News:

    Forward March chairman asks for and gets amended request

    Reporting in Historic City News was mentioned by several speakers during yesterday morning’s meeting of the St Johns County Commission. Our article preceding the meeting, and individual e-mail copies sent to the chairman and commissioners, resulted in the $10,000 funding request, by Sheriff David Shoar, being taken off the “fast track” consent agenda and modified to bring the requested action into compliance with state law.
    The illegal request, as originally worded, would have been item 2 on the consent agenda. It was appropriately moved to item 1 on the public agenda and opened for public comments. Several spoke on the matter including Forward March, Inc., president Ronald E. Birchall, and Veterans Council chairman Bill Dudley. Sheriff Shoar did not appear to speak.
    Community Activists Tom Reynolds of St Augustine Beach and Ed Slavin of St Augustine both spoke in support of local veterans while concurring that the request, as worded, did not comply with state law and had all appearances of a political favor to a pet project of the sheriff.
    The county attorney had to rewrite the motion to specify a required “law enforcement purpose” so that the commission wouldn’t violate state law by approving the sheriff’s request. Commissioner Jeb Smith was vocal in his concerns that such an improperly composed request would come forward.
    Following Birchall’s statement, Commissioner Jimmy Johns admitted that he had no idea of the identities of officers and directors of Forward March, Inc. When Birchall could not recite the members of his board, stating that they change from time to time, Johns asked if that organizational information could be provided outside of the meeting. In the interim, during comments by Ed Slavin, he provided Johns the state website address (sunbiz.org) where Johns could look the information up for himself. Johns apologized for not being prepared with that information.
    Because Forward March, Inc., is not “the seizing agency”, they will be bound to public disclosures provided in Chapter 119 F.S., with respect to accounting for these moneys. With the new educational purpose delineated to include a crime prevention and drug abuse education aspect, the board unanimously approved the amended request, 5-0.

    Viewing all 6454 articles
    Browse latest View live