Quantcast
Channel: Clean Up City of St. Augustine, Florida
Viewing all 6438 articles
Browse latest View live

Thanks to outgoing St. Johns County Commission Chairman James K. Johns for publicly supporting lobbying disclosure rules.

$
0
0
More moral leadership is desired and required. St. Johns County needs ethics, lobbying disclosure and post-employment reform laws. Now.

Posted November 30, 2017 09:32 am
By JAKE MARTIN jake.martin@staugustine.com
Commission roundup: Outgoing chair Johns speaks in favor of lobbyist disclosures

Before handing over the gavel to the St. Johns County Commission’s new chair, Henry Dean, Commissioner Jimmy Johns at the Nov. 21 meeting spoke in support of requiring lobbyist disclosures. He said he wants to know whom he’s talking to up front.

Johns also expressed concerns about the county’s open-ended contracts and said he felt a “gut check” was needed. He said some of the county’s contracts have been in place over 10 years and should be revisited.

Later, during closing comments, county attorney Patrick McCormack said there was a description of local government lobbying regulations provided at a recent training session with the Florida Association of Counties. He said there will likely be a proposal in the state legislature this year to come out with some standard regulations to be used by local governments.

“We will keep our eye on that,” he told commissioners.

McCormack didn’t address Johns’ comments regarding the open-ended contracts, but did circle back to another item brought up by the commission regarding possible term limits for commissioners.

There are no term limits currently on the books for St. Johns County commissioners, but rarely do any serve or even run for more than two four-year terms, at least in recent years.

McCormack said he always presumed only charter counties could impose term limits, but also said he hasn’t found any language prohibiting non-charter counties from doing so. However, he said he believed there was some relevant case law out there somewhere, and that he’d try to track it down and bring it back to the board.

Staging area agreement

At the head of Tuesday’s meeting, Dean said about two dozen oceanfront homeowners in Ponte Vedra Beach are in “dire straits” after hurricanes Matthew and Irma, and a series of nor’easters over the past year or so.

He said homes are increasingly in harm’s way with less and less beach between them and the ocean. He called for immediate action under the county’s ongoing emergency order, declared for Irma, to authorize use of Mickler’s Landing as a staging area for a group of homeowners to get privately-funded sand placement projects done.

The county will let a contractor use the public beach access point as a staging area on the condition they reimburse the county for any damages to the parking lot or property afterward.

A similar arrangement was put in place last year following Matthew.

County Administrator Michael Wanchick said he doesn’t want the landing closed for a long period of time due to limited access points. He said homeowners will aggregate their initiatives so workers can “get in and get out.”

Dean clarified all the work being done is at the homeowners’ expense.

Wanchick said Mickler’s Landing will be closed for a period of time yet to be determined, due to permitting and other looming uncertainties. He said the goal is to minimize disruption. Commissioner Jay Morris said the beach is not as crowded in the winter months anyway.

One of the Ponte Vedra homeowners speaking during public comment said they’re only looking for access, not financial help. She said what were once beaches have become cliffs, and the edges are getting closer and closer to the foundations of many homes, if they’re not already there.

“Obviously, everyone’s been through a lot of hell,” she said. “… It will come out of our own pockets and it’s not cheap. Thank God we can afford it, but we need the access.”

Commissioners unanimously gave the go-ahead to proceed.

More details, please

Commissioners voted to continue a major modification request for the County Road 210 Town Center planned unit development that would add about 154.4 acres of land for a total of 198.9 acres, increase commercial development from 445,000 square feet to 1,450,000 square feet and add 187,000 square feet of other non-residential uses. The request included several waivers, many regarding signage.

Over the course of a nearly two-hour presentation and discussion, commissioners expressed numerous concerns about a lack of specifics in the developer’s plans. While acknowledging the benefits of commercial development and making clear their intention to proceed once some details are ironed out, they determined the item wasn’t ready for prime time.

The applicant, Helow Properties, will work with county staff on additions and revisions, and come back to the board at a later meeting.

Other business

Due to its proximity to the holidays, the board’s Jan. 2 meeting has been canceled. The board will meet Dec. 5 and Dec. 19, but not again until Jan. 16.




Edward Adelbert Slavin · 
Thanks to outgoing St. Johns County Commission Chairman James K. Johns for publicly supporting lobbying disclosure rules. 
He's the first elected official in St. Johns County to do so. 
Government watchdog Tom Reynolds et al. have urged this reform in meetings. Thank you, Commissioner Johns, for listening to us.


St. Augustine’s Confederate monument context group is developing, and so are plans for protest (SAR)

$
0
0
Let the healing continue. Encourage people to apply before December 29, 2017 3 PM deadline. It's up to us.


St. Augustine’s Confederate monument context group is developing, and so are plans for protest

PETER.WILLOTT@STAUGUSTINE.COM A sign stands in front of the Confederate monument on the Plaza de la Constitucion in St. Augustine on Wednesday, November 29, 2017, telling of the city’s plans to add historical context to the site.

As of Wednesday afternoon, eight people had applied to help the city of St. Augustine add context to its Confederate monument.

The city plans to establish the committee to bring a more complete Civil War history to its monument in the Plaza de la Constitucion. Meanwhile, a local minister is standing by his demand that both monuments in the public square be removed.

“I don’t really trust the process of contextualization. … It’s wrong to honor people who were traitors and honor the system of slavery,” said the Rev. Ron Rawls, who recently organized a protest of the monuments.

One monument, controlled by the city, remembers 44 men who served the Confederacy. A University of Florida-controlled monument on the western end of the public square bears the image of a Confederate flag and honors Confederate Gen. William Loring and his service in other conflicts — it’s also where his ashes are buried.


The City Commission voted in October to keep its monument after hearing hours of testimony at two meetings, and after research into other issues such as the cost of removing the city’s monument. They also decided to create a seven-member committee to help provide context to the site.

The deadline to apply for the panel is 3 p.m. on Dec. 29, and participants don’t have to be city residents, according to city documents.

Others beside the eight applicants (see Sidebar) have expressed interest in the committee but hadn’t filed an application as of Wednesday afternoon, according to city documents.

City Manager John Regan said he expects to have recommendations on the candidates to city commissioners for a decision no earlier than their meeting on Jan. 22.

As the city pushes ahead with the committee, Rawls said he is planning his next moves.

Rawls, pastor at St. Paul AME Church in St. Augustine, led a protest of the monuments during Light-Up! Night — the city’s kickoff to its annual Nights of Lights event — on Nov. 18. He said he believes the city has not truly listened to his concerns and those of other African-Americans, despite two public meetings.

Before Light-Up! Night, Regan had the city post a sign in front of its monument describing their effort to add a more fleshed-out Civil War history to the site.

“I just wanted to make sure that the community and people that look at the monument know that this is a work in progress, that we’re not ignoring any issues, that we’re following through with what the commission approved,” Regan said.

Rawls said he plans to announce his “next steps” via Facebook this weekend. While he won’t protest nonprofit events, he said plans to protest more city-backed events and draw outside attention to the city.

“We’re going to continue on with that show,” Rawls said. “We’re going to take advantage of events that are sponsored by the city to show guests and people on the outside what we feel is a truer picture of St. Augustine.”
WHO HAS APPLIED?

According to applications provided to the City of St. Augustine, candidates seeking to be part of a committee that will help add context to the city’s Confederate monument thus far include:

• Stephen Danner, a military sales manager at Acrow Bridge Corporation of America.

• Thomas Graham, an author and retired Flagler College history professor.

• Marty Lewis, who served on “the original formative board” for the state park at the site of Fort Mose, a settlement of freed slaves in the St. Augustine area, and was part of the site’s historical society.

• George Linardos, a retired attorney.

• Kenneth Maass, a retired educator who taught social studies and American history at St. Augustine High School.

• Jill Pacetti, an office manager and bookkeeper who is related to Eusibio Pacetti, one of the men listed on the Plaza’s Confederate monument.

• James Willow, a Vietnam veteran who has “studied both sides of the Civil War.”

• Andrew Witt, executive director of the St. Johns Cultural Council.









13 Comments
Sort by
Pamela Vandiver Stanford
Can this guy go away already back to where he came from. Why doesn’t he help a country that STILL has slavery??? Instead of living in the past here?!?!
LikeReply618 hrs
Marshell Carnage
Perhaps you can return to where you came from, Europe could use the population boost.
LikeReply316 hrs
Pamela Vandiver Stanford
Marshell Carnage LOL really that was an intelligent comment. I’m right where I was belong born and raised right here in St Augustine. He is NOT from here. And it’s sad that he thinks he knows what my ancestor; whose name is on the monument in the plaza; thoughts about slavery were. Just goes to show how stupid people are when they think that was the ONLY reason we left the Union. SMDH. But thanks for the laugh this morning. Have a good day. I’ll pray for you and BLESS YOUR HEART.
LikeReply416 hrs
Pamela Vandiver Stanford
Marshell Carnage as a matter of fact you don’t even know my views on slavery. So for the record I’m against it.
LikeReply216 hrs
Tom Reynolds · 

HEY CARNAGE .................. easy TUFF GUY!
LikeReply16 hrs
Bob Lynn
Pamela Vandiver Stanford Strange, no one is "for" slavery. Those days are long gone. It's time to move on.
LikeReply112 hrs
John Barnes
Pamela Vandiver Stanford the last time I checked St Augustine was in the USA no the CSA.
LikeReply110 hrs
Pamela Vandiver Stanford
Bob Lynn well the way y’all are carrying on and making a big deal about a memorial one would get the impression y’all think we are for slavery because we want them left standing. SMH 🤦🏻‍♀️
LikeReply9 hrs
Pamela Vandiver Stanford
John Barnes ok I’m sorry let me clarify that for you. Way back before the Civil War when Florida left the Union. Wow LOL 🤦🏻‍♀️
LikeReply9 hrs
Marshell Carnage
Rev. Rawls is a member of the community and has been since 2007. He has as much right to express concern about the community he is raising his children as you Pamela.
LikeReply9 hrs
Pamela Vandiver Stanford
Marshell Carnage so then why doesn’t he focus is energies on doing something about the growing homeless problem. Or the growing opioid problem. Some issues that really matter rather than focusing on the past. 🤦🏻‍♀️
LikeReply19 hrs
Cindy Rockafellow · 

Pamela Vandiver Stanford do you realize that African Americans in this country don’t even KNOW who their ancestors are or what their country of origin might be? And a big part of the reason that they don’t know this is because they were not documented as people and brought to our soil as “cargo”. Those monuments celebrate the erasure of other people’s ancestory and history.
LikeReply17 hrs
Pamela Vandiver Stanford
Cindy Rockafellow so you are saying that my ancestors history shouldn’t mean anything to me even though my family didn’t own slaves, bring slaves over etc? So you want me and every other St Augustine NATIVE (meaning been here since it’s foundation not just since 2007 (rawls) or any other transplant) that has a name on that monument to just erase our history to make you feel comfortable with living here? I have no idea why my ancestors fought in the Civil War. BUT take down the monument or leave them up I will FOREVER be PROUD of him and every other man that fought for what they believed was right. Y’all just so focused on the slavery aspect like it was ONLY in the South. And question if you erase the South’s history does that mean the Civil Rights movement didn’t happen then either. You can’t change history. It happened. It’s a sad disturbing part of our American History. But people moving here should NOT have a right to tell LOCAL NATIVE ST AUGUSTIANS to take down something that has been here LONG before them. People moving here have been slowly destroying this town over the years and it’s disgusting and disturbing. And these monuments no where on them do they say they that they celebrate slavery. It’s a monument of men who went and fought in a War that was all across this Nation. What about the African Americans that fought for the South? Are they now shunned by the African Americans of today? And are you suggesting that every single African American in this country today can’t trace their ancestors? None of them? not one?. I find that hard to believe. Some but all? I have no intention of not celebrating my ancestors or being PROUD I’m from the SOUTH. I just don’t get if everyone and everything is so offensive and needs to be changed in the South why does everyone keep coming here?
LikeReply26 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Pamela Vandiver Stanford Retired Florida National Guard Colonel Elizabeth Masters put it best in a St. Augustine Record column -- honorable people fight dishonorable wars. Let's work on healing. No one chooses their parents or their ancestors. The monuments will stay.
LikeReply6 hrs
Dan Winkler · 

There are many things to stand up for, how about the community the pastor has his church in. There are families there that could benefit from positive support rather than this misdirected interest in history.
LikeReply517 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Let the healing continue.

Thanks to Mayor Shaver for leadership, listening graciously to some 106 speakers, starting August 28th (Feast of Saint. Augustine, 452nd anniversary of Menendez's sighting land and naming our town after a black man, Saint Augustine of Hippo). The Civil War veteran monument will remain. We need healing, starting with "contextualization."

St. Augustine's Spanish Governors freed British slaves. In retaliation, the British twice burned our small town. Fort Mose state park honors the African-Americans who won freedom from slavery under the Spanish, fleeing oppression in British slave-owning colonies.

We need greater protection for resources with enhanced National Park Service status.

We need to promote healing, with respect for history, including:
1. Enactment of St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore, first proposed by Mayor Walter Fraser, Senator Claude Pepper, et al. in 1939. Let's honor 11,000 years of history, including the first Africans (free and slave) who arrived here on September 8, 1565 with Pedro Menendez, and America's first Hispanics, Catholics and Jews. Courageous Menorcans, Greeks and Italians fled British contract-slavery in New Smyrna colony in 1777, voting with their feet. Let's share these inspiring stories with the world with NPS interpretation.

2. Adding local Union Civil War veterans' names to monument.

3. Emancipation Proclamation Park monument (site of first reading is now a parking lot).

4. National civil rights museum here honoring St. Augustine Movement's role in adoption of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, making history come alive.

5. Sculptures honoring families of slavery victims,

6. Monument honoring Sisters of St. Joseph Sisters Mary Thomasine Hehir, Mary Scholastica Sullivan and Mary Benignus Cameron, arrested by Sheriff in 1916 on orders of then-Gov. Park Trammell, retaliation for teaching in "negro" school (St. Benedict the Moor).

7. Sculpture(s) of civil rights heroes Robert Hayling, Stetson Kennedy, Otis Mason and Barbara Vickers, near General William Wing Loring monument.

8. Renaming Loring Park, perhaps as Stetson Kennedy Park, honoring the KKK-busting hero forever,

9. Monument to "Guillermo," first anti-Gay hate crime victim (1566), a French translator of the Guale language, whom Menendez ordered garroted to death in secret because he said Guillermo was a "Sodomite and a Lutheran."

10. Florida law requiring K-12 civil rights education, like in Mississippi.

11. Renewed dedication to restoring democracy, open government and transparency.

12. Halting developers destruction of our history, wetlands, wildlife and beauty.

13. Ending housing, employment and public accommodations discrimination.

14. Restoring artists and entertainers to their rightful place in historic downtown.

15. Election vote on County Charter: limited, open, accountable government, independent Inspector General and Ombuds.

16. Single-member Commissioner districts.

17. Solving mobility, affordable housing and low wages.

18. Pumping system to protect Our Oldest City from ocean level rise. Hurricanes Matthew and Harvey are harbingers. We'll get federal funds through enactment of the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore.

19. Federal Grand Jury investigation of corruption and civil rights violations, including September 2, 2010 shooting death of Michelle O'Connell and Sheriff David Shoar's massive coverup, documented in 2013 and 2017 New York Times investigations and PBS/Frontline. Shoar persecuted and tried to prosecute FDLE special agent Rusty Rodgers. The stain of corruption in St. Johns County is indefensible, and must be ended at once. The whole world is watching us as a result of the Michelle O'Connell case.

RFK said after Dr. King was murdered, "what we need in the United States is not hatred (but) ... love and wisdom, and compassion toward one another, and a feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or they be black."
LikeReply517 hrs
Ted Alex Wilson · 

What everyone seems to forget is Loring and many other Confederate hero statues were built to celebrate the South by people who hated the fact that blacks were "equal" and also hated the North. In 1920 to 1950 at the height of Jim Crow is when they were built, Loring's not after the war, but in 1920. Why?

To send a message to black people and carpetbaggers, this is ours and you aren't welcome here. And as far as some are concerned, that message continues today. Contextualize that.
LikeReply711 hrsEdited
Louise Austin · 

Ted Alex Wilson I agree with you. How can treason and White Supremacy be contextualized?
LikeReply713 hrs
Ted Alex Wilson · 

Louise Austin, they're gonna try. 🤔
LikeReply211 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Ted Alex Wilson Loring is a grave monument, not a statue. See below for more on this general, who was respected by both Union General and future President U.S. Grant and by General W.T. Sherman.
LikeReply6 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

But I support changing name of Loring Park to Stetson Kennedy Park, while contextualizing the Loring monument. Does that work for you?
LikeReply5 hrs
Richard Crooks · 

Seems to me there are more important things to be worrying about, like staying fed! This guy is an outside troublemaker who's tax return I'd love to see to ascertain where his income is derived from.
LikeReply216 hrsEdited
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

1. My favorite Civil War General was William Tecumseh Sherman. General Sherman recommended General William Wing Loring to the Khedive of Egypt, who hired him as a General.
2. General Loring toured General U.S. Grant and his wife around Egypt after Grant was President.
3. When General Loring died, he was honored and feted by both Union and Confederate veterans, first in NYC and then here in St. Augustine (where they celebrated Loring's life at a joint camp for a week).
4. Healing matters. Who knew better than Civil War veterans, including both Grant and Sherman?
LikeReply215 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Do y'all know what song President Abraham Lincoln had the band play after General Lee surrendered to General Grant?
LikeReply314 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Auretha Callison He told the band to play "Dixie."
LikeReply12 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Lincoln promoted healing. Heed the example of his Second Inaugural Address, "with malice toward none, with charity toward all... to bind up the Nation's wounds....
LikeReply12 hrs
Tom Reynolds · 

WHAT A WASTE of TIME!

LAST CHANCE OFFER FROM ME ............................

ADD MY PHOTO TO ALL MONUMENTS!

IT"S A GO .................

PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD WILL COME HERE!
LikeReply115 hrs
David Cash
Rawls needs to worry about his flock. This could be a healing moment for them. But he has decided to continue the hate and division. Not very Christian. He has joined the ranks of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Nothing positive can come from this continued misguided attempt to remove our history.
LikeReply215 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Not one word from Rawls at his church on healing -- it was a frightening hate rally, using words like "traitor." Rawls at first blocked Prof. Tom Graham from speaking. Yet Rawls invited Doug Russo to the front of the church to speak in defense of slavery. Rawls needs therapy.
LikeReply114 hrs
Dennis Homsey · 

Juan Ponce de Leon Statue next?? he was a genocidal, gold-hunting lieutenant of Christopher Columbus and should not be honored American Indians say.
Do we still honor Martin Luther King Jr? JFK files recently released by the National Archives, includes the assertion that singer Joan Baez was among the multiple women with whom King allegedly had affairs, the New York Daily News reported. A dossier on Martin Luther King Jr. claims the civil rights leader possibly fathered a child out of wedlock, and had an affinity for orgies.
LikeReply315 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

FBI Director John Edgar Hoover had a permanent hate-on for Dr. King. Consider the source of the "dossier" and his lifelong animus against activists.
LikeReply313 hrs
Christopher Myers · 

The war against slavery was THE VICTORY over slavery. It cost thousands of lives to finally end such an awful human cancer. That monuments exist is a testimony to true diversity—revealling human character and broad convictions; removing them, any of them because of the emotional charge they elicit, is to eradicate the legacy of our nation's turbulent quest for justice. History will repeat itself without cautionary milemarkers that inform and help us understand. That souls rally to remove such milemarkers is not a surprise: we all want to be free of what we hate, but this is a democracy where both sides matter.
UnlikeReply414 hrs
Jay Neumark · 

I fully support taking any funding that would be used for removal of monuments to build a civil rights museum. It's a waste of money to remove history. Instead lets move forward and add more. St. Augustine has great stories to tell and the more we teach people the more we come together in understanding.
LikeReply13 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Imagine a 40,000 square foot museum showing all of St. Augustine's human and natural history, perhaps at the long-flat site of the Sebastian Inland Harbor.
LikeReply12 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Or a K-12 civil rights curriculum in Florida, as Mississippi adopted under Gov. Haley Barbour.
LikeReply6 hrs
Bob Lynn
He wants his 15 minutes to last awhile longer
LikeReply12 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Informal poll: "Rev" Rawls reminds me of [fill in name of demagogue]??
Reply7 hrs
Eric Marchiafava
I dont think Rawls understands many soldiers have died (of all races) , in many wars over the centuries, for causes or reasons they did not understand and may not have agreed with- Most in their teens and twenties. A vast majority of those soldiers were conscripts and had no choice and served out of duty or answered the call; Or else be labeled a traitor and executed, imprisoned and/or reflect shame upon their family- Confederate "soldiers" most certainly included. Removing the gravestones or memorials would be very unamerican and divisive to the community!
LikeReply6 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

I agree. My parents were Northerners, married at Fort Benning, one of ten military bases named for Confederate Generals, and for a reason -- to promote healing. Military veterans and service members did much to promote healing. I agree with what Prof. Tom Graham started to suggest in Rev. Rawls' church back in August -- names of St. Augustine's Union Civil War veterans need to be added to monument.
Reply6 hrs
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

1. Rawls wants to punish dead people by removing their monument, infuriating their greatgrandchildren. UnChristian. Our Menorcan friends and neighbors related to the people on that monument -- some 25,000 of them -- deserve respect. The monument stays.
2. Rawls' angry invocation of "treason" and "traitors" in this article invokes our United States Constitution, Article III, Section 3, Clause 2. "The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."
3. Thus, would it be unconstitutional for the City of St. Augustine to remove a monument to local war veterans based upon allegations of "treason" that were never proven in court? I've asked the City Attorney for research.
4. Rawls needs to find a new hobby, or is it a hobbyhorse?
LikeReply6 hrs

SAB CITY "MANAGER" MAX ROYLE's MANIPULATIONS re: Monday night, 12/4/17 Vote on Filling St. Augustine Beach City Commission Vacancy

$
0
0
Longtime St. Augustine Beach City "Manager" BRUCE MAX ROYLE is trying to save his job.

One in every 398 St. Augustine Beach registered voters wants to be considered for City Commission.
How cool is that?

Fourteen (14) candidates have filed for consideration to fill the vacancy left by the resignation of Commissioner Sherman Gary Snodgrass.  The new Commissioner elected or appointed on December 4, 2017 could join three other Commissioners and vote to fire ROYLE.  The St. Augustine Beach City Charter requires a supermajority, or four of five Commissioners, to fire ROYLE (but not future City Managers, and not any other employee)!  "Believe it or not!"®

In the wake of a sexual harassment coverup, misfeasance, malfeasance and nonfeasance, ROYLE is scrambling.  The normally somnambulistic satrap is throwing elbows and disinformation.  Like an escaping octopus, ROYLE is squirting ink in our faces.

In an effort to stave off his own retirement or firing, did BRUCE MAX ROYLE:

1. Attempt to excuse an incomplete, non-responsive application from favored candidate David Ashley Bradfield?  Bradfield told people that "the Commission" asked him to apply but submitted an incomplete application.  But Bradfield filed NO letter of intent explaining his interest in the job.  Bradfield attended the November 6 meeting where Snodgrass resigned.  Days later, Bradfield went on vacation to one of his homes in Costa Rica.  The City explains that Bradfield had lawyer Jane West, PZB Chair, file a handwritten note.  But there was no letter of intent explaining his interest in the job.  Ms. West's one-sentence handwritten note attached Bradfield's firm resume (for Design Build Logistics LLC, a company whose corporate charter expired in 2010 for nonpayment of fees, but is still listed on Bradfield's LinkedIn profile).   The City's website required "a letter of interest stating why they want to serve on the Commission." Bradfield didn't write one.

2.Fail to require candidates file Financial Disclosure (Form 1, as candidate Rose Bailey and every Commission candidate does by F.S. 112)?

3. Fail to require candidates fill out the same City form required of board applicants?

4.Fail to obtain Commission consent or consensus, e.g., on the deadline and job requirements, failing to bring it up again on November 7?

5. Fail to bring up the issue of post-Commission lobbying? (There's a loophole Commissioners could fill -- State Ethics Commission considers people "appointed" to City Commission not "elected," hence won't enforce F.S 112 restrictions on post-Commission lobbying of appointees.

6.Attempt to deny public comment? Commissioner Maggie Kostka and City Attorney James Patrick Wilson agree that public comment is required under F.S. 286, as it was in 2016, when Mr. Wilson was hired, and (full disclosure) I supported him publicly).

7.Praise and encourage writing of a "well-written"editorial by Jim Sutton, noisomely attacking "Manager" ROYLE's two (2) biggest critics among the fourteen (14) applicants? The editorial's sniping attacks on Ms. Bailey and Mr. Reynolds -- the only applicants are named -- are in pari delicto with ROYLE's habitual resentment of activists, stiffing of Open Records requesters and wrongful attempts to charge fees.

8.  Patronize the four current St. Augustine Beach Commissioners, talking down to them as if they were mindless mental midgets? ROYLE actually submitted St. Augustine Record Opinion Editor Jim Sutton's two questions to Commissioners and showed his arrogance and"Amateur Hour" status by sending a December 1, 2017 e-mail to Commissioners, stating inter alia:


-------- Original message --------
From: Beverly Raddatz
Date: 12/1/17 7:43 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Comm England , Comm George , Comm O'Brien , Comm Kostka
Subject: FW: Questions for Commission Candidates

Mayor and Commissioners:

There are no set list of questions for you to ask each candidate for the Interim Commissioner position. However, here are some suggestions that might be helpful and might stimulate other questions from each of you.

In the November 28th edition of The Record there was a well-written editorial by Jim Sutton about your search for an Interim Commissioner. In case you missed it, here are two questions that Jim suggested you might ask each candidate: 1. What makes you qualified to lead this City? 2. Why do you want to serve as the Interim Commissioner?
In the memo that I wrote for your meeting, I suggested three questions, one of which is similar to #2 above. The other questions are: 1. Will you be available to attend all Commission meetings—regular, special and workshop—during your term as Interim Commissioner? Or that question could be worded differently: Is there any reason that will prevent you for attending all Commission meetings during your term as Interim Commissioner? 2. What do you think is the single, most significant problem facing the City, what solution do you propose to correct the problem and how would you work with the Commission to implement that solution? If the solution involves spending money, how do you propose the City pay for the solution?
Max

Sheriff's Department Violated Fourth Amendment by Illegal Surveillance, Two Offending Officers Never Punished

$
0
0
Sheriff DAVID SHOAR never punished Detective Thomas Marmo and Sgt. Brian Canova for videotaping and watching attorney-client meetings. They did so pursuant to orders from SHOAR, the internationally known obstructor of justice in the Michelle O'Connell case. SHOAR is the mentally unbalanced St. Johns County political boss, Republican Lord of All He Surveys, a legend in his own mind.




Posted April 9, 2014 09:11 am - Updated April 10, 2014 12:11 am
By ANDREW PANTAZI andrew.pantazi@jacksonville.com
St. Johns deputies violated suspect's rights with secret recording

Two St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office deputies violated a constitutional right and the federal wiretapping law, a federal court ruled, when the two secretly recorded conversations between a suspect and his attorney and forcibly took a written statement from the suspect.

Detective Thomas Marmo and Sgt. Brian Canova were investigating Joel Studivant for a potential violation against a domestic violence injunction. Marmo was interviewing Studivant with his attorney, Anne Marie Gennusa.

Studivant and Gennusa did not know they were being recorded, and Studivant began preparing a written statement. Marmo then left the room to talk to Canova. Studivant and his lawyer talked and decided not to give the statement.

Canova and Marmo watched through a hidden camera.

Marmo came back into the interview room and forcibly grabbed the written statement from the lawyer and arrested Studivant.

The criminal charges were eventually dismissed after a deferred prosecution agreement.

It doesn’t matter, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said, that Gennusa wasn’t harmed. It matters that Marmo took something that didn’t belong to him.

If Marmo believed evidence was about to be destroyed, he could argue that he could’ve taken the evidence without a warrant.

But the deputies had no reason to believe they couldn’t have obtained the evidence with a warrant.

The court also ruled the two violated Studivant’s and Gennusa’s rights by secretly recording the two.

Studivant had no reason to expect he was being recorded, the court ruled, because he wasn’t under arrest, especially because he was having a privileged conversation with his attorney.

“The government has no weighty law-enforcement, security, or penological interest in recording, without a warrant, the attorney-client conversations of a person who has not been arrested, even if those conversations take place in an interview room at a sheriff’s office,” the court ordered.

St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office spokesman Chuck Mulligan said he couldn’t comment because the court’s ruling can still be appealed.


Edward Adelbert Slavin · 

Apparently, no punishment was ever meted out to the the two officers --whom four judges in two courts held illegally listened in on attorney-client conversations, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. St. Johns County Sheriff David Shoar habitually violates constitutional rights. The St. Augustine Record must investigate his misfeasance, malfeasance and nonfeasance.
LikeReplyJust now


For more on SHOAR and his record of violating citizens' constitutional rights, please  consult the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the Gennusa v. Canova case:  http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201213871.pdf , and the 14,000 word New York Times investigation and the PBS Frontline and NBC Dateline investigations at:
http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/two-gunshots/ "Two Gunshots on a Summer Night," by Walt Bogdanich and Glenn Silber
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/death-in-st-augustine/  PBS Frontline documentary, "A Death in St. Augustine" and 2016 followup:













Two Martin County Commissioners Arrested for Failing to Share "Private" E-mails on the People's Business (Miami Herald)

$
0
0
Don't you wish we had an ethical State's Attorney in St. Johns County, who would prosecute Open Records and Sunshine violations?

Two in Florida arrested as part of widening public records scandal
BY JOSE LAMBIET
jose@gossipextra.com
Miami Herald
NOVEMBER 29, 2017 04:55 PM
UPDATED NOVEMBER 29, 2017 05:15 PM

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/ent-columns-blogs/jose-lambiet/article187159413.html#storylink=cpy

In a move that should send a chill down the spines of thousands of elected officials in Florida, former Martin County Commissioner Anne Scott, a retired judge originally from Chicago, and current Commissioner Ed Fielding were booked Tuesday night into the county jail after being indicted in a public records scandal that already cost taxpayers upward of $25 million.

Scott, 69, who lives in Hobe Sound and lost her seat after one term in November, and Fielding, 73, were charged with two counts each of failure to permit inspection and copying of public records.

Each count is a misdemeanor that could, at worst for them although unlikely, see the elected officials spend up to a year in jail.

The arrests came hours after another sitting commissioner, Sarah Heard, was charged with a noncriminal violation of the same statutes, a set of laws that force public officials to surrender records of communications with other politicians, staff members and the public. Heard’s charge is a civil violation akin to a parking ticket, and she faces fines of up to $500.

Fielding surrendered to the county jail at 5 p.m. and Scott at 8:30 p.m. They were fingerprinted, photographed and released on their own recognizance after about an hour, said sheriff’s spokeswoman Christine Weiss.

It is unclear at this point why the Martin County State Attorney’s office is treating Scott and Fielding differently because the office has yet to file charging documents for Fielding and Scott.

But Richard Kibbey, who represents Heard but has not been retained by the other two, explained the grand jury may have believed Heard was negligent in her handling of the records while Scott and Fielding had the intention of hiding their records.

“That could explain why the defendants have been treated differently,” Kibbey said.

While the state attorney’s spokeswoman isn’t commenting, the developments are believed to be the result of an ongoing grand jury investigation into the handling of public records by county officials.

Scott, Fielding and Heard, who is in her fourth term on the County Commission, are accused of failing to surrender emails to developers investigating why the commission suddenly started voting against them.

The emails were requested by Lake Point, a mining company on the banks of Lake Okeechobee. The company was out to prove that commissioners were illegally communicating and discussing public business in private and conspiring with members of the public against the company’s interests.

It took several years for the trio to produce their emails. When she was asked to show emails from her private Yahoo account, Heard claimed it had been hacked. In a civil lawsuit, several witnesses testified Heard was lying.

So far, the county has lost one civil lawsuit over the public records and was ordered to pay $500,000 of Lake Point’s legal bill.

And the commission voted last month to settle a second lawsuit, for breach of contract. Depending on how to calculate the loss to taxpayers, the county may end up having to pay more than $25 million to Lake Point. Earlier today, the commission voted to borrow money to pay some of the settlement.

Neither Fielding nor Scott returned calls for comment.


Anne Scott booking mug Martin County Sheriff’s Office


Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/ent-columns-blogs/jose-lambiet/article187159413.html#storylink=cpy

SEXUAL HARASSMENT: Dilatory St. Augustine Beach City Manager, Attorney Dither for 119 Days, With No Change in Policy Proposed

$
0
0


119 days ago, City Attorney JIM WILSON promised to work with City Manager MAX ROYLE to present a revised sexual harassment policy to Commissioners.  None has been provided.  Why?

In the wake of the sexual harassment scandal caused by St. Augustine City "Manager" MAX ROYLE's maladroit mishandling of alleged sexual harassment by Building Official GARY LARSON, this stinks.   

Commissioners will evaluate ROYLE at their meeting tonight (or a continuation meeting, due to interviews with fourteen candidates for the vacancy created by resignation of Commissioner Sherman Gary Snodgrass. 

Here's the inculpatory correspondence from the itty-bitty City:



-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Slavin
To: braddatz ; mroyle ; hardwickra ; comrobrien ; comugeorge ; commengland ; commkostka ; jpwilson
Sent: Mon, Dec 4, 2017 1:18 pm
Subject: Re: Request No. 2017-659: SEXUAL HARASSMENT: Four (4) months of inaction on City of St. Augustine Beach Sexual Harassment Policy?

Dear Mayor O'Brien, Vice Mayor George, Commissioners England and Kostka, Chief Hardwick, Messrs. Royle and Wilson and Ms. Raddatz:
1. The minutes of the August 7, 2017 St. Augustine Beach City Commission meeting state: 
"City Attorney Wilson advised that he would discuss this further with City Manager Royle and bring back a [sexual harassment] policy to the Commission to approve.  (Page 25 of attached minutes)(emphasis added).
2. That apparently never happened.  What is the status?
3. Please provide:
(A)  City Attorney James Patrick Wilson's time records; and 
(B)  A timeline of all work done on this policy during each of the last 119 days by Messrs. Royle, Wilson, et al.
4. Please place this item first on the agenda for tonight's meeting of the St. Augustine Beach City Commission, before the interviews with City Commission vacancy candidates.
Thank you. 
With kindest regards, I am,


-----Original Message-----
From: Beverly Raddatz <braddatz@cityofsab.org>
To: Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 4, 2017 12:16 pm
Subject: RE: Request No. 2017-659: City of St. Augustine Beach Sexual Harassment Policy update

Mr. Slavin:
 
Please see the attached per your request.  The topic starts on page 24.
 
Sincerely,
 
Beverly Raddatz, MMC
City Clerk
City of St. Augustine Beach
2200 A1A South
St. Augustine Beach, FL 32080
(904) 471-2122  FAX (904) 471-4108
 
Confidentiality Notice: This Email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited, and that you have received this E-Mail and any accompanying files in error. You should notify the City of St. Augustine Beach immediately by replying to this message and deleting them from your system. City of St. Augustine Beach does not accept responsibility for changes to E-Mails that occur after they have been sent.
 
 
 
From: Ed Slavin [mailto:easlavin@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 11:53 AM
To: Beverly Raddatz <braddatz@cityofsab.org>; Max Royle <mroyle@cityofsab.org>; Robert Hardwick <hardwickra@sabpd.org>; Beverly Raddatz <braddatz@cityofsab.org>; Comm O'Brien <comrobrien@cityofsab.org>; Comm George <comugeorge@cityofsab.org>; Comm England <commengland@cityofsab.org>; Comm Kostka <commkostka@cityofsab.org>; Jim Wilson <jpwilson@cityofsab.org>
Subject: Re: Request No. 2017-659: City of St. Augustine Beach Sexual Harassment Policy update
 
Good morning, all: 
1. What was date of meeting to which Ms. Raddatz refers? Please send minutes.
2. Please place this matter on tonight's agenda.
Thank you.
With kindest regards, I am,
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Beverly Raddatz <braddatz@cityofsab.org>
To: Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 4, 2017 10:48 am
Subject: RE: Request No. 2017-659: City of St. Augustine Beach Sexual Harassment Policy update
Mr. Slavin:
 
I have attached the draft harassment policy for your review.  This was what was given to the Commission a couple of months ago at the Regular Commission meeting, which the Commission did not have any objection to.  
 
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
 
Sincerely,
 
Beverly Raddatz, MMC
City Clerk
City of St. Augustine Beach
2200 A1A South
St. Augustine Beach, FL 32080
(904) 471-2122  FAX (904) 471-4108
 
Confidentiality Notice: This Email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited, and that you have received this E-Mail and any accompanying files in error. You should notify the City of St. Augustine Beach immediately by replying to this message and deleting them from your system. City of St. Augustine Beach does not accept responsibility for changes to E-Mails that occur after they have been sent.
 
 
 
From: Ed Slavin [mailto:easlavin@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 10:03 AM
To: Max Royle <mroyle@cityofsab.org>; Robert Hardwick <hardwickra@sabpd.org>; Beverly Raddatz <braddatz@cityofsab.org>; Comm O'Brien <comrobrien@cityofsab.org>; Comm George <comugeorge@cityofsab.org>; Comm England <commengland@cityofsab.org>; Comm Kostka <commkostka@cityofsab.org>; Jim Wilson <jpwilson@cityofsab.org>
Subject: Request No. 2017-659: City of St. Augustine Beach Sexual Harassment Policy update
 
Dear Mayor O'Brien, Vice Mayor George, Commissioners England and Kostka, Ms. Raddatz, Messrs. Wilson, Hardwick & Royle, :
1. Please send documents on the status of the update of the City of St. Augustine Beach's sexual harassment policy.
2. Please place on the Commission's agenda for tonight's meeting.
Thank you.
With kindest regards, I am,
 

Ex-Democratic Congresswoman Corrine Brown sentenced to 5 years in federal prison

$
0
0
Let every white collar criminal quake in their boots. The FBI is alive and well and investigating corruption in Northeast Florida.




Corrine Brown sentenced to 5 years in federal prison
By MATT DIXON 12/04/2017 01:06 PM EST

TALLAHASSEE — A federal judge in Jacksonville on Monday sentenced former Democratic Rep. Corrine Brown to five years in federal prison after she was convicted last May on corruption charges for her role in using a scam charity to bilk donors and use the money for personal expenses, the Florida Times-Union reported.

The 71-year-old disgraced congresswoman’s chief of staff, Ronnie Simmons, got 48 months in prison, while the founder of the charity, One Door for Education President Carla Wiley, received a 21-month sentence for her role.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Corrigan said Brown abused the public trust to carry out a criminal conspiracy, the newspaper reported.

“This is a sad day for everyone,” said Corrigan after sentencing Brown to prison. “I was impressed with all the outpouring of support for you, and I think it’s a tribute to all the work you’ve done over the years. That’s what makes this all the more tragic.”

“This was a crime born of entitlement and greed, committed to supporting a lifestyle that was beyond their means,” said Corrigan. “Just think of the good that could have been done with that money if it would have been used for its intended purpose.”

Brown was also given three years probation. Brown's attorney says her client plans to file an appeal.

The prison sentence marks the end of a legendary figure in Florida politics.

In 1992, Brown, of Jacksonville, was the first African-American from Florida to be elected to Congress since Reconstruction. She was best known for her slogan “Corrine Delivers,” a nod to the fact that she had knack for securing federal funding for her district.

In the 2016 Democratic primary, she was defeated by former state Sen. Al Lawson. The corruption case haunted her on the campaign trail. Her loss was also attributed to the fact that she joined state Republicans in opposing changes to her 5th Congressional District, which became a national poster child for gerrymandering. For years, the district snaked from Orlando to Jacksonville, picking up pockets of black communities and cities along the way. The seat was politically good for Brown, but made the surrounding congressional districts whiter and more Republican-leaning.

After a lengthy court battle over the newly drawn seats, Brown’s congressional district was redrawn to stretch east-west from Jacksonville to the Tallahassee region. It’s still overwhelmingly Democratic, but Brown departed from near Democratic consensus to oppose the changes because it lowered the number of black voters in the seat.

"Tallahassee was, and still is, an oasis of dissipation and indulgences of every ilk" (SAR column by Jim Sutton)

$
0
0


Amazing column by Jim Sutton about slutty Tallahassee politician (his dad, who was a State Senator and State Representative. Thank you for blowing the whistle.

Posted December 3, 2017 12:02 am
Egos, libidos the culture of politics

In the country’s new web of sexual harassment, it’s fitting that politicians are getting stuck like the blowflies they likely are. Egos are the ethos in both Tallahassee and Washington D.C.

The behavior isn’t something new, though the spotlight certainly is. I grew up in it, but was too young to realize it back then.

Dad was a member of Florida’s House of Representatives and later a Senator. I spent my childhood days on the road with him during the endless electioneering.

Back then it was a long series of, generally, fish fries, where the candidates spoke on makeshift stages. My job was to stick bumper stickers on as many parked cars and trucks as possible until it was his turn at the mic.

Then he’d hold me in one arm and gesture with the other as he spoke, and it always ended with his five-year-old pronouncing, “Vote for my dad. He’s the best.”

There would be photo sessions with dad and me in the little Orlando Clipper boat, fishing. Or dad and me riding horses. We stretched barb wire around the pasture for the campaign photos and walked through our orange groves.

Parades were a big thing back then. Seems we were always in one. Dad would drive with mom in the front. My sisters and I waved from the back of a convertible. They wore their Easter dresses and little white gloves.

For most of the year we stayed home in a sleepy town called Windermere outside of Orlando — which, come to think of it, was a sleepy town itself in the late 1950s. Disney had not yet descended upon us.

But during the session, my little sister, Cookie, and I went with mom and dad to live in Tallahassee. My two older sisters stayed for those months at home with my grandmother because they were in elementary school.

I got appendicitis that year and Gov. LeRoy Collins gave me a gold spoon with the Florida crest on it for being brave.

For most of my childhood whatever dad did, I did. My three sisters took the mandatory dance, singing and piano lessons every weekend, leaving dad stuck with me.

That meant heading to Cocoa Beach many weekends to fish with his buddies. If you wonder if egos were just as big back then, dad named his 26-foot Scottie Craft boat the “Payola.” I didn’t know what the word meant until later.

I remember having many ”aunts” that hung around the little trailer we had there with a big screened porch off to the side where I was told to stay.

I remember being 15 miles offshore when dad would hand me off to another boat for the day, with an “uncle” who always had those layered sugar cookies for me to eat.

If we weren’t fishing, we were glad-handing between elections. We rode the Georgia-Florida Train from Orlando the Jacksonville annually as part of the campaign. I saw things on those trips it took years to understand.

As a teen, the fog kind of lifted for me. Dad would hit on my friends’ mothers, or anyone else’s. It ended when he divorced my mother and married my best friend’s mother. So my buddy became my brother. And the jig was pretty much up.

My mom, used to being at parties and big to-dos most of her married life, became a waitress at the Dutch Inn on International Drive in order to make a living. My sisters lived with dad in his new digs. I stayed with mom, whose life became a hollow cycle of embarrassment and shame.

She would come home from work so exhausted from being on her feet all day and getting stiffed on tips by foreign tourists, she’d soak her corns in Epsom salts and cry herself to sleep.

Tallahassee was, and still is, an oasis of dissipation and indulgences of every ilk. I can’t condone what so many of our elected leaders do behind the backs of their constituents, not to mention wives. But it is a culture of quid pro quo in which plenty of females get what they want while paying their moral piper — giving the same, whether for a job or a vote or just a good time.

Go to Clyde’s and Costello’s bar on Adams Street any afternoon during the spring and you’ll see more business being conducted than any eight-hour session inside the Capital. There’s more when it closes.

Maybe all this attention to the libidos of our elected leaders will curb the excesses. But I doubt it. They’ll just get smarter or more careful.

And their little boys may grow up wondering, too, why they can’t fish in dad’s boat anymore.

Jim is the Opinion Page Editor. Reach him at jim.sutton@staugustine.com or 904-819-3487.





2 Comments
Edward Adelbert Slavin · 
Thank you for speaking out. Eloquent and evocative and moving.
LikeReply2 mins
Megan Davis Porter · 
This was obviously very difficult to write. Incredibly moving and sad, and you managed to capture the rancid atmosphere of politics and corruption.






Corrine Brown, Ex-Congresswoman Who Ran a Sham Charity, Gets 5 Years in Prison (NY Times)

$
0
0
Good work by the FBI and U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida.

Sentence should have been longer.

Do you reckon that certain other local corrupt officials are nervous?

The FBI is investigating corruption in Northeast Florida.

Photo
Corrine Brown, a former United States representative from Florida, was sentenced Monday to five years in prison for operating a fake charity that she used to fund personal expenses.CreditBob Mack/The Florida Times-Union, via Associated Press 

Corrine Brown, a former longtime United States representative from Florida, was sentenced to five years in prison on Monday for operating a fraudulent charity that she used for more than $300,000 in personal expenses, including tickets for N.F.L. games and a Beyoncé concert.

A federal judge handed down the sentence in a Jacksonville, Fla., courtroom, excoriating Ms. Brown, 71, for abusing her powerful position in the House of Representatives for “entitlement and greed” to support a lavish lifestyle. Ms. Brown, a Democrat who represented parts of Jacksonville and northern Florida for nearly a quarter-century, must surrender to the authorities next month.

“Brazen barely describes it,” the judge, Timothy J. Corrigan of United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, said of Ms. Brown’s sham charity.

Ms. Brown was convicted in May on 18 criminal counts, including mail and wire fraud and filing false tax returns. She lost her re-election bid in the Democratic primary in August 2016, a few weeks after she was indicted.

Her lawyer, James Smith, said he planned to appeal the verdict and the sentencing. “The sentence was substantively unreasonable, and it was too harsh,” Mr. Smith said in an interview Monday evening. While sentencing guidelines called for a term of between more than seven years in prison up to nine years, Mr. Smith said that politicians convicted of similar crimes had received more lenient sentences.

Ms. Brown was among the first African-American politicians elected to Washington from Florida and burnished a reputation in state and national politics as a civil rights champion and as an advocate for the less fortunate. Because of that legacy, the charity, One Door for Education, may have seemed to donors as an extension of her passion.

Ms. Brown, along with two other people, collected more than $833,000 in charitable donations, telling benefactors that their money would help students pay for college and allow schools to receive computers. But One Door for Education did nothing of the sort.

Instead, the donations were funneled into Ms. Brown’s personal bank accounts and toward extravagant items. About $330,000 of the charity’s donations paid for events that included a Florida golf tournament, professional football games and a luxury stadium box for a Beyoncé concert.

“Ms. Brown leveraged the authority of her office and the relationships she had cultivated to illegal purpose,” Judge Corrigan said. “She cast aside the very laws that she helped to enact. The rules, she decided, did not apply.”

The One Door for Education charity was run by Ms. Brown, who personally solicited many of the donations; her chief of staff, Elias Simmons, known as Ronnie; and the organization’s president, Carla Wiley. Ms. Wiley started the charity in Virginia in 2011 but raised very little before she recruited Mr. Simmons to help. He brought in Ms. Brown to raise money.

While One Door for Education may have begun as an honest charity, it turned into a slush fund for all three, prosecutors said. Mr. Simmons withdrew $93,536 in cash from A.T.M.s and gave some of the money to Ms. Brown and kept the rest for himself, they said. Ms. Wiley also pocketed $182,730, prosecutors said.

While Ms. Brown pleaded not guilty and went to trial, both Mr. Simmons and Ms. Wiley pleaded guilty and testified against the former representative. The judge also sentenced them on Monday, with Mr. Simmons receiving four years in prison and Ms. Wiley 21 months.

At the hearing, Judge Corrigan noted that Ms. Brown had earned the respect and admiration of many people in her district during her time in Congress and the decade before that in the Florida House of Representatives. But the judge criticized her for showing no contrition for the crimes.

“She cannot be accorded the same sentencing consideration as someone who accepts responsibility for her wrongful action, expresses remorse and promises to make amends,” Judge Corrigan said.

A version of this article appears in print on December 5, 2017, on Page A18 of the New York edition with the headline: Ex-Congresswoman Who Ran Fraudulent Charity Is Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison.

ETHICS COMMISSION FORCES ST. AUGUSTINE PLANNING AND BUILDING DIRECTOR DAVID BIRCHIM TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM VARIANCE FOR HIS OWN CONTRACTOR

$
0
0
Did DAVID DOUGLAS BIRCHIM violate Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes re: 
CONFLICTING EMPLOYMENT OR CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP?

The credibility of St. Augustine's Planning and Building Director DAVID BIRCHIM is in shreds.  An ethics complaint may be filed.  

Will BIRCHIM be fired?

It happened on November 7, 2017 at the PZB.

DAVID DOUGLAS BIRCHIM never disclosed that it was his own home construction contractor for which he argued with, interrupted and bludgeoned PZB member Karen Zander over her raising concerns about legally required residential parking and strongly recommended a variance to build fourteen small homes at 216 Riberia Street.

At the November 7, 2017 PZB meeting, DAVID BIRCHIM failed to recuse himself and failed to disclose that the applicant, New Castle Construction, LLC, is under contract to raise and rebuild his flood damaged home in Lincolnville.  BIRCHIM argued that PZB must not consider parking requirements and that the City has ignored them for 20 years

A November 30, 2017 letter from the Florida Ethics Commission forced DAVID BIRCHIM to recuse himself from further speaking on a variance sought by his own building contractor, New Castle which then lost the variance unanimously, 7-0 at the December 5, 2017 public hearing, after a citizen raised concerns about conflict of interest.  In response, City staff demurely reported that BIRCHIM had recused himself.  

That's why BIRCHIM was not seated at the staff table for that item!

The 216 Riberia Street application was rejected 7-0 on December 5, 2017.

Shortly thereafter, I was provided a copy of the November 30, 2017 Florida Ethics Commission letter (below).

Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes provides:
CONFLICTING EMPLOYMENT OR CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP.- No public officer or employee of an agency shall have or hold any employment or contractual relationship with any business entity or any agency which is subject to the regulation of, or is doing business with, an agency of which he or she is an officer or employee . . .; nor shall an officer or employee of an agency have or hold any employment or contractual relationship that will create a continuing or frequently recurring conflict between his or her private interests and the performance of his or her public duties or that would impede the full and faithful discharge of his or her public duties.

I first raised the issue in Open Records requests and this blog, last month. 

Will that it has the Ethics Commission letter and has seen the November 7, 2017 PZB meeting video, will St. Augustine Record now write an article?

You can watch videos here:


Item 4B

2017-0146 Todd Mitchell – Applicant
Riberia Street, LLC Etal and New Castle Homes,
LLC – Owner
216 Riberia Street and PID #2133500210
To increase the allowed lot coverage, and to reduce
the side building setback on a Lot described as Lot
5 to construct single family unit(s) on properties
known as Parcel ID #2133500000 and Parcel ID
#2133500210



Item 4A

2017-0146 Todd Mitchell – Applicant
(Continued November 7, 2017) Riberia Street, LLC Etal and New Castle Homes,

LLC – Owner
216 Riberia Street and PID #2133500210
To increase the allowed lot coverage, and to reduce
the side building setback on a Lot described as Lot
5 to construct single family unit(s) on properties
known as Parcel


Here's the Ethics Commission letter:


Michelle Anchors
Chair
Michael Cox
Vice Chair
Jason David Berger
Daniel Brady, Ph.D. Matthew J. Carson
Guy W. Norris
Kimberly Bonder Rezanka
State of Florida
COMMISSION ON ETHICS P.O. Drawer 15709 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-5709
325 John Knox Road
Building E, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida 32303
"A Public Office is a Public Trust"
Virlindia Doss
Executive Director
C. Christopher Anderson, III
General Counsel/ Deputy Executive Director
(850) 488-7864 Phone (850) 488-3077 (FAX) www.ethics.state.fl.us
______________________________________________________________________ November 30, 2017
Ms. Isabelle Lopez
City Attorney, City of St. Augustine
Transmitted via email
Re: Your email received November 27, 2017 Dear Ms. Lopez:
This is in response to your above-referenced inquiry on behalf of Mr. David Birchim, Director of the Planning and Building Department for the City of St. Augustine, concerning whether he has a conflict of interest under the Code of Ethics as to a company which is seeking from the City a setback variance for one of the company's projects and which also contracts with Mr. Birchim for his home renovation.
You state that Mr. Birchim is a full-time City employee and, in that capacity, he attends meetings and presents recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Board. You explain that the company in question presently has a contract with Mr. Birchim to rebuild his flood-damaged home, which is not part of the company's project related to its request before the PZB. You state that he has no other business relationship with the company. You ask whether he has a conflict of interest that would prohibit him from presenting a staff report and recommendation to the PZB concerning the company's project.
The provision of the Code of Ethics possibly implicated is Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, which provides:
CONFLICTING EMPLOYMENT OR CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP.- No public officer or employee of an agency shall have or hold any employment or contractual relationship with any business entity or any agency which is subject to the regulation of, or is doing business with, an agency of which he or she is an officer or employee . . .; nor shall an officer or employee of an agency have or hold any employment or contractual relationship that will create a continuing or frequently recurring conflict between his or her private interests and the
Ms. Isabelle Lopez November 30, 2017 Page 2
performance of his or her public duties or that would impede the full and faithful discharge of his or her public duties.
The first part of Section 112.313(7)(a) prohibits a public officer from having an employment or contractual relationship with a business entity or agency that is regulated by or is doing business with the officer's agency. Mr. Birchim's agency is the Planning and Building Department, which has regulatory authority over construction companies, including apparently the company with which Mr. Birchim has a contract for home renovation.
In CEO 81-51 and CEO 76-75, the Commission on Ethics concluded that, as long as a municipal building official removes himself from personal involvement and decision-making in connection with a company involved in construction at his personal residence, the official has no prohibited conflict of interest under Section 112.313(7)(a). Accordingly, as long as Mr. Birchim is completely removed from any involvement by any division of the Planning and Building Department as to the company's renovation of his home and also as to any other matter concerning the company which comes before the Department (including the PZB) while his contract with the company is in force, he apparently would not have a prohibited conflict of interest under the first part of Section 112.313(7)(a).
The second part of Section 112.313(7)(a) prohibits a public officer from having an employment or contractual relationship which will create a continuing or recurring conflict between the officer's private interests and the performance of the officer's public duties or which would impede the full and faithful discharge of his or her public duties. Absent any ties between the Mr. Birchim and the company, other than his renovation project as stated above, he apparently would have no prohibited conflict under the second part of Section 112.313(7)(a), provided he removes himself from involvement as to the company as set forth above.
Also, since Mr. Birchim is a City employee rather than a voting member of the PZB, the voting conflict statutes, Sections 112.3143(3) and 112.3143(4), Florida Statutes, would not be implicated and he apparently would not be required to make any disclosures as to his home renovation contract with the company in question.
In sum, under the Commission opinions noted above, as long as Mr. Birchim does not appear before the PZB concerning the company or its requests and as long as he also is removed, in his public position, from any involvement within the Department concerning the company during the time of his personal contract with the company, Mr. Birchim's contract for home renovation with a company regulated by his agency apparently would not present him with a prohibited conflict of interest under Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes. If the facts of his situation change in a material way, please contact us for further guidance. If such future contact is made, refer to this letter. The Commission opinions and statutes cited herein are available at www.ethics.state.fl.us. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Betsy Daley
Senior Attorney
Florida Commission on Ethics


Here's the trail of e-mails that led to the Ethics Commission letter being obtained and released:


-----Original Message-----
From: St. Augustine Public Records <recordsrequest@citystaug.com>
To: Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 2:14 pm
Subject: RE: Request No. 2017-637: Disclosures by City of St. Augustine Planning and Building Director David Douglas Birchim


Please see the attached documents responsive to your public record request.
From: Ed Slavin [mailto:easlavin@aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 1:54 PM
To: David Birchim
Cc: sr@sarahryanarchitect.com; matthew.shaffer@att.net; longdella24@yahoo.com; sagresta@comcast.net; jcblow@bellsouth.net;gmisterly@gmail.com; karen@97park.com; Nancy Shaver; Darlene Galambos; Isabelle Lopez; Denise May; David Birchim; Leanna Freeman; Nancy Sikes-Kline; Roxanne Horvath; Todd Neville; John Regan; Lucy Fountain; Jim Piggott; Martha Graham; Todd Grant; 
Subject: Re: Request No. 2017-637: Disclosures by City of St. Augustine Planning and Building Director David Douglas Birchim
Dear Mr. Birchim:
1. Please respond to my November 10, 2017 request Number 2017-637 today. 
2. Do I understand correctly that New Castle Homes, LLC is your contractor for work on your home on Riberia Street?
3. Did you fail to disclose this fact to PZB members at the November 7, 2017 meeting on the 216 Riberia Street application?
4. If so why?
5. Do you plan to place this disclosure on the record at the December 4, 2017 meeting?
6. If not, why not?
7. Do you plan on recusing yourself from any further business by New Castle Homes, LLC.  If not, why not?
Thank you and Happy Thanksgiving.
With kindest regards, I am, 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com>
To: sr <sr@sarahryanarchitect.com>; matthew.shaffer <matthew.shaffer@att.net>; longdella24 <longdella24@yahoo.com>; sagresta <sagresta@comcast.net>; jcblow <jcblow@bellsouth.net>; gmisterly <gmisterly@gmail.com>; karen <karen@97park.com>; nshaver <nshaver@citystaug.com>; dgalambos <dgalambos@citystaug.com>; ilopez <ilopez@citystaug.com>; dmay <dmay@citystaug.com>; dbirchim <dbirchim@citystaug.com>; lfreeman <lfreeman@citystaug.com>; nsikeskline <nsikeskline@citystaug.com>; rhorvath <rhorvath@citystaug.com>; tneville <tneville@citystaug.com>; jregan <jregan@citystaug.com>; lfountain <lfountain@citystaug.com>; jpiggott <jpiggott@citystaug.com>; mgraham <mgraham@citystaug.com>; tgrant <tgrant@citystaug.com>
Sent: Fri, Nov 10, 2017 10:19 am
Subject: Request No. 2017-637: Disclosures by City of St. Augustine Planning and Building Director David Douglas Birchim
Good morning:
1. Please send me any documents from St. Augustine Planning and Building Director David Douglas Birchim ever disclosing to our St. Augustine City Manager, City Attorney, City Commission, City Planning and Zoning Board or residents the names of the contractor(s) doing post-hurricane construction work 2016-2017 on Birchim's home.  If none exist, please so state today.
2. If Mr. Birchim ever made any such disclosures orally, kindly send me today the notes, minutes or meeting video timestamp of any such disclosures to our City Manager, City Attorney, City Commission, City PZB or residents. If no oral disclosures ever took place, please so state today.
3. If Mr. Birchim ever recused himself from participating in any matters affecting the interests of the contractor(s) working on his home, please send me the document(s) today.
Thank you.
With kindest regards, I am, 


Three Florida Democrats wanted Trump impeachment to proceed (Tampa Bay Times)

$
0
0
Yes, among the courageous 58 who voted December 6, 2017 on impeachment proceeding, there were three Florida Democrats who wanted Trump impeachment to proceed, voting against a motion to table the matter.  The rest of the House needs spinal and testicular implants, apparently.  Three cheers for Reps. Alcee Hastings, Lois Frankel and Frederica Wilson.












Three Florida Democrats wanted Trump impeachment to proceed

By Alex Leary Published: December 6, 2017Updated: December 6, 2017 at 10:42 PM

WASHINGTON – A move to prompt impeachment proceedings against President Trump was defeated on Wednesday, with most Democrats joining Republicans.

But 58 Democrats opposed the GOP motion to table, including Florida Reps. Alcee Hastings, Lois Frankel and Frederica Wilson.



Trump Disbands Panel That Helped Cities Respond to Climate Threat (EcoWatch)

$
0
0

Texas National Guard soldiers conduct rescue operations in flooded areas around Houston, Texas on Aug. 27. 1Lt. Zachary West, 100th MPAD

As residents of coastal communities engaged in trying to cope with global ocean level rise, we're appalled.  What an insolent snob.

Trump Disbands Panel That Helped Cities Respond to Climate Threat
By Jessica Corbett

In the Trump administration's latest attempt to quash any efforts by the federal government to raise awareness or mitigate the effects of climate change, a community resilience panel announced Monday that the president had terminated the two-year-old group.


Chairman Jesse Keenan, a Harvard University professor, told the other members of the Community Resilience Panel for Buildings and Infrastructure Systems on Monday that there would be no further meetings and the panel would dissolve, per President Donald Trump's orders.

"This was the federal government's primary external engagement for resilience in the built environment," Keenan told Bloomberg News.

"It was one of the last federal bodies that openly talked about climate change in public," he added. "I can say that we tried our best and we never self-censored!"

The panel was created in 2015 by former President Barack Obama in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, and had more than 350 volunteer members. Its mission to guide municipal governments and local groups to improve buildings, communications, energy systems and transportation in response to climate threats made the panel especially vulnerable under the Trump administration.

Keenan told E&E; News that the panel's ability to collaborate resilience efforts across local, state, and the federal government as well as the private sector were especially notable, and described the group's key activities:

We identified gaps in codes and standards, we proposed streamlined communications channels, we vetted best practices in design standards, we created guides for operators of infrastructure facilities, etc. ...

It was a very diffuse effort by virtue of the diversity of infrastructure sectors that we covered, but we built a meaningful entity that served as a direct avenue of engagement with the federal government.

The panel was sponsored by the Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology, and co-sponsored by the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Office of Economic Resilience, the Commerce Department's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, and the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as well as its Office of Infrastructure Protection.

The group's members were scheduled to meet again in the spring of 2018.

Mayor Nancy Shaver Honored for Her Sea Level Rise Leadership (City of St. Augustine press release)

$
0
0
December 8, 2017

St. Augustine Mayor Nancy Shaver recognized for her leadership on the issue of sea level rise

Northeast Florida Regional Council's Quality of Life Award presented yesterday

St. Augustine Mayor Nancy Shaver has been awarded the Northeast Florida Regional Council's (NEFRC) Quality of Life Award for Excellence which recognizes individuals, organizations or projects that contribute to the livability and quality of life in Northeast Florida

In announcing this year’s award recipient, Brian Teeple, NEFRC Chief Executive Officer praised Mayor Shaver’s leadership that resulted in St. Augustine being a city that welcomed a vulnerability assessment and holds regular community conversations on the topic of sea-level rise. He also called attention to her energy and enthusiasm as Co-Chair of Resiliency Florida, a state-wide not-for-profit that helps communities plan and adapt for the future impacts of weather and sea level rise.

“This is a time for leadership, and Mayor Shaver is providing that,” Teeple said.

The NEFRC, one of ten regional planning councils in the state of Florida, provides a network of local governance, serving seven counties in District 4: Baker, Clay, Duval, Flagler, Putnam, Nassau and St. Johns, as well as their municipalities.

The award was presented by NEFRC's 1st Vice President, Catherine Robinson, Mayor of Bunnell at the organization's 15th Annual Elected Officials Luncheon and Regional Leadership Awards ceremony held yesterday, December 7, 2017.

# # #




St. Augustine Mayor Nancy Shaver (right) receives the Northeast Florida Regional Council’s Quality of Life Award for Excellence from the organization’s 1st Vice President, Catherine Robinson, Mayor of Bunnell (left) at the organization's 15th Annual Elected Officials Luncheon and Regional Leadership Awards ceremony held yesterday, December 7, 2017. (Photograph by NEFRC staff.)

We can pledge the income stream from bed tax revenue to build a nice new pier (or let the old one collapse into history)

$
0
0
Don't let the pier fade away.  Take steps to preserve our environmental heritage today.



Tell your St. Johns County Commissioners what you think. Don't take "no" as if it were an answer. We can pledge the income stream from bed tax revenue to build a nice new pier (or let the old one collapse into history).  Ask questions.  Demand answers . Expect democracy.  Support the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore.

Contact your Commissioners.


Click for Commissioner Johns' webpageJames K. Johns
Commissioner, District 1

P: (904) 209-0301
C: (904) 615-7437
E: bcc1jjohns@sjcfl.us
Commissioner Johns' web page

Click for Commissioner Smith's webpageJeb Smith
Commissioner, District 2

P: (904) 209-0302
C: (904) 325-4182
E:  bcc2jsmith@sjcfl.us
Commissioner Smith's web page.

Click for Commissioner Waldron's webpagePaul M. Waldron, Vice-Chair
Commissioner, District 3

P: (904) 209-0303
C: (904) 436-3973
E: bcc3pwaldron@sjcfl.us
Commissioner Waldron's web page

Click for Commissioner Morris' webpageJay Morris
Commissioner, District 4

P: (904) 209-0304
C: (904) 814-9403
E: bccd4@sjcfl.us
Commissioner Morris' web page.

Click for Commissioner Dean's webpageHenry Dean, Chair
Commissioner, District 5

P: (904) 209-0305
C: (904) 325-3924
E: bcc5hdean@sjcfl.us
Commissioner Dean's web page




Ask them to pledge the income stream from St. Johns County bed tax revenue to build a nice new pier (or let the old one collapse into history). Florida Statute 125.0104 allows us to use bed tax money "to acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, or promote one or more zoological parks, fishing piers or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public." Ask questions. Demand answers . Expect democracy. Support the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore.


Posted December 7, 2017 06:13 am
By JAKE MARTIN jake.martin@staugustine.com
St. Augustine Beach commissioners mull taking Pier Park off St Johns County’s hands


St. Augustine Beach Mayor Rich O’Brien and City Manager Max Royle met recently with St. Johns County Administrator Michael Wanchick and Commission Chair Henry Dean regarding the county’s Pier Park property, and what to do about it.


O’Brien and Royle recapped that discussion at the beach commission meeting Tuesday night.

According to Royle, the county wanted an official request from the city that the Wednesday farmers market be allowed to remain at the park an additional 90 days from the current expiration date, in order for the city to get its ducks in a row to possibly take over the property and any events there.

Wanchick and Royle have talked for months about transferring the title of the Pier Park property, including the parking lot, from the county to the city.

SEE ALSO

St. Augustine Beach commissioners mull taking Pier Park off St Johns County’s hands
POPE’S VIEW: Saving the pier, a goal for all?
A transfer of title would be contingent on the parking lot remaining a parking lot, and would exclude the actual pier and visitor information center, which would remain the county’s responsibility.

Whether the city will continue having a farmers market operated at that location by the not-for-profit St. Augustine Beach Civic Association, which currently holds the contract with the county, is a separate matter.

Royle said he and his staff would be crunching the numbers on costs of managing and maintaining the volleyball courts, pavilion and parking lot. He said the intent would be to keep the area “as it is today.”

“We can’t afford to do striping and painting, and landscaping and all that,” he said.

Royle said the city has to determine what it would charge the people using those facilities in order to recoup the costs and build up a reserve for larger capital expenses later on. Commissioners touched on the possibilities of charging for parking, reserving the volleyball courts or using the pavilion for special events.

O’Brien said the property in question has a market value of about $5 million, as well as an intrinsic value to residents and visitors. He said the property has “incredible” potential, with the right business model.

“I don’t want to see us five years from now, 10 years from now and have people say, ‘Why didn’t they take advantage of that opportunity?’” O’Brien said. “I think they would say that.”

Vice Mayor Undine George said her only concern is the long-term strategy, or lack thereof. She questioned the county’s willingness to take care of preservation of the pier once they’ve divested themselves of everything else around it.

O’Brien said the county’s made it clear they have no funding for the pier and no vision for the park.

Commissioner Donald Samora, sworn in on Monday, said it would be nice to have some more local control over the destiny of the park.

Commissioner Margaret England said the city should keep the county on the hook, somehow. She also expressed interest in taking the fire station property, adjacent, once the county builds a replacement facility. That could be years down the road, though.

Commissioner Maggie Kostka questioned why the county wasn’t negotiating the farmers market arrangement with the civic association directly, seeing as how they have a written agreement, at least for the time being.

George said she’d rather not get in the middle of that relationship and voiced her support for month-by-month renewals of the contract until the city takes over the property, at which point they could put out a request for proposals to operate the market. She said she didn’t want the city to come into the property with any standing long-term leases.

Royle suggested sticking with a letter to the county expressing interest, pending mutual agreeable terms, for the sake of continuing the process to the next step.

Commissioners ultimately provided consent to send a letter of continued interest in taking over the property.

At a joint meeting of the two local commissions in May, it was made clear the county doesn’t have the money for major upgrades to Pier Park, to say nothing of the pier itself. The county is operating with a deficit of more than $1 million in beach services funding, while facing a host of other financial hurdles.

Estimates for rebuilding the pier are between $10 million and $14 million. Officials from both governments said their agencies don’t have the money on their own to build a pier.

Spread the swamp? Trump administration wants to move government offices out of Washington (LA TIMES)

$
0
0
Not so fast. The costs vastly outweigh the benefits, reduce Congressional oversight, and threaten further corruption, as at the sleazy offices that romped with Big Oil lobbyists while failing to regulate offshore oil drilling properly.

Spread the swamp? Trump administration wants to move government offices out of Washington







Amid the talk of draining swamps, restoring political might to blue-collar America and turning off the spigot of taxpayer cash that showers Washington, a familiar battle cry is ricocheting through this city: Move the bureaucrats out.
It has the ring of a Trumpian fantasy. Dislodge arms of the federal government from Washington and reattach them in faraway places, spreading the wealth generated by these well-paid agency workforces and forcing senior bureaucrats to face the people they affect.
But the idea has established populist roots that spread across party lines, and they are reemerging at this unique political moment.
The swaggering Interior secretary from Montana is putting the finishing touches on his plan to move the headquarters of three large public lands agencies to the West. The Stanford economist representing Silicon Valley in Congress sees opportunity to strategically seed regions of the country with pieces of the federal bureaucracy that can benefit them — and that they can benefit. The unlikely prospect of locating the Department of Transportation in Los Angeles is dangled by Republicans eager to show this crusade has bipartisan cred.
There hasn't been so much buzz about getting "Washington" out of Washington since Franklin D. Roosevelt sent 30,000 federal workers to the Midwest after a presidential commission advised such moves would ensure the prototypical federal employee "remains one of the people in touch with the people and does not degenerate into an isolated and arrogant bureaucrat."
“We need to find out what we can move,” said Rep. Tim Ryan, a Democrat from Youngstown, Ohio, who is seeking to create a commission that would identify parts of the bureaucracy that could be moved to economically distressed regions like his. A fellow Ohio congressman and political rival, tea party activist Warren Davidson, has mounted a parallel bureaucracy migration push. He calls it the “Drain the Swamp Act.”
None of it is going over well with die-hard Washingtonians. Many scold that the idea will flame out the same way it did when the Clinton administration pondered and then dropped a big relocation initiative, and the Reagan administration did the same before it.
When the House Government Oversight Committee passed a “Divest D.C.” resolution earlier this year that calls on all agencies to investigate moving out, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the nonvoting House representative for Washington, warned that it would cost taxpayers a fortune, spread dysfunction throughout the bureaucracy and economically devastate the region.
Her Democratic allies on the committee were not impressed by the suggestion of the measure’s sponsor, former Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) that maybe it could lead to the Department of Transportation moving to the traffic capital of the nation, liberal Los Angeles.
Other Democrats, though, are intrigued by the possibilities of a redistributed bureaucracy.
“There is a lot of wisdom outside the Beltway,” said Rep. Ro Khanna, the Silicon Valley Democrat. He wants agencies to more aggressively tap into it, as the Defense Department did when it set up a shop in Silicon Valley. Khanna, a Stanford economist, is among several in Washington’s intellectual circles who say fading factory and farm towns are well positioned to benefit from the kind of relocations envisioned in plans like Ryan’s.
There are other reasons the movement has regained steam of late. While only 15% of the federal workforce is in Washington, it is where most of the top decision makers live and work. David Fontana, a professor at George Washington University Law School who is writing a book about decentralizing the federal government, says their bubble is growing evermore insulated from reality.
"When you have this concentration of important people all in a single place, they form their own tight networks immune to other influences," he said. Decentralizing that power away from the capital has long been a trend in other countries, Fontana said. "This is not a crazy idea."
The Trump administration will likely put it to the test soon. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, a Montanan, is aiming to move the headquarters of the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Reclamation out of Washington as soon as logistically possible. Western politicians like Sen. Corey Gardner (R-Colo.) are cheering him on.
“Ninety-nine percent of the nearly 250 million acres of land managed by BLM is west of the Mississippi River, and having the decision makers present in the communities they impact in Colorado or across the region will lead to better results,” Gardner wrote in an email.He wants the bureau headquartered in his state, and Colorado’s Democratic governor, John Hickenlooper, has joined Gardner’s lobbying campaign.
House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop (R-Utah), who held a hearing Thursday to examine Zinke’s plan, said in an interview that his constituents are so distrustful of what they see as a heavy handed National Park Service that he had to abandon his plan to elevate Dinosaur National Monument to a national park, a move that he hoped would lure a world-class research center to the state and boost tourism. He’s hopeful Zinke’s blueprint would ultimately ease those tensions by bringing more public lands management out west.
Some Democrats, though, see a sham at a time Zinke has also been unabashed about his plans to shrink the Interior Department’s workforce, which includes pushing workers out by relocating them. “This reorganization is an exercise in weakening the Department of Interior by driving employees out,” said Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.). “Once they’re gone, the extractive industries will be able to check off the top item on their wish list” — getting the stewards of public land out of their way.
A lot of the broader relocation debate is familiar. And some scholars project that while a few hundred jobs might get moved here or there, the broader vision of moving large pieces of Washington officialdom hundreds or thousands of miles away will end up in the shredder, as tends to happen with outsized plans to reinvent and reimagine government. The politics are messy, the logistics are tough, and the status quo is entrenched.
"While this has perennial appeal, it is hard to pull off," said Andrew Rudalevige, a professor of government at Bowdoin College in Maine.
There is also the danger of that it could create problems instead of solving them. Matt Lee-Ashley, a public lands expert at the liberal Center for American Progress, warns that accountability is undermined when agencies move away from the lawmakers and federal investigators who watch over them. He points to the scandal that enveloped the Minerals Management Service during the administration of George W. Bush. It had been set up in suburban Denver with a mandate to conduct the business of collecting $10 billion in royalties like a private company. It turned into a cesspool of corruption and bad behavior, according to federal investigators.
Of course, the argument that Washington is the cure for corruption and bad behavior can be a tough one to make. And the headaches and expense of shoehorning so many agency headquarters into this costly, congested town keep growing.
The projected costs of a new FBI headquarters in suburban Washington escalated until they hit close to $2 billion. The plug got pulled on the whole project over the summer amid the rising price and difficulties pulling off the land swap it was designed around.
"There is all this unused office space outside of Detroit where the FBI could build for not much money," said Paul Kupiec, a scholar at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute. That city, unlike suburban Washington, desperately needs the economic surge such an agency would bring, he said. "Why are we spending billions of dollars on these headquarters in Washington?"
evan.halper@latimes.com

Davenport, FL Mayor Faces Suspension, for Felony Forging and Using Dead Woman's Disabled Parking Placard

$
0
0
This arrest brings to mind the lackadaisical attitude of local law enforcement in St. Johns County, who repeatedly ignore violations of disabled parking laws (including alleged serial  violations by dodgy St. Johns County Sheriff's Civil Process Supervisor WILLIAM JONES, President of the controversial St. Augustine Beach Civic Association).  Kudos to the Polk County Sheriff for this righteous bust.

Ex-Mayor JOSEPH LESTER BOLES, JR. did not even sink this low (but he would use an official city business sign in the front window of his car to avoid parking regulations while he was on non-city business).


From THE LAKELAND LEDGER, GateHouse Media (A unionized Newspaper Guild paper)
Davenport commissioners want governor to suspend Mayor Darlene Bradley following arrest
By Suzie Schottelkotte
Posted Dec 7, 2017 at 5:37 PM
Updated Dec 8, 2017 at 8:22 AM


DAVENPORT — Commissioners in Davenport voted unanimously Thursday to ask Gov. Rick Scott to suspend Mayor Darlene Bradley following her arrest Tuesday on allegations she fraudulently used the handicapped placards of dead people to park in a handicapped space at City Hall.
Her lawyer, Rafael Echemendia of Lakeland, asserted in a statement read during the special meeting that the felony arrest was politically motivated.
“Unfortunately, when my client ran for office, she upset the political apple cart,” he wrote, “and this case is being handled in a manner that it would not normally be handled but for the politics involved,” he wrote.
“It is my understanding that Mayor Bradley was of the erroneous belief that the placards were associated with her husband’s visual disability, and did not have any information that the placards belonged to someone other than her husband,” Echemendia said. “This should have been a civil citation or a misdemeanor at best, but powerful interests are taking full advantage of a decision my client made due to her legitimate concerns for her safety.”
According to Bradley’s arrest affidavit, state records show neither she nor her husband, John Lepley, has been issued a disabled placard or handicapped license plate in Florida.
At Thursday’s meeting, City Attorney Andrew Hand told commissioner they didn’t have the authority to suspend Bradley, but could seek her resignation. Commissioners said they were concerned about the finality of that.
Related content
PCSO arrests Davenport mayor, says she was using dead people’s handicapped placards
December 6, 2017
An apology to the citizens of Davenport
“Once she resigns, that’s final,” Commissioner Tom Fellows said. “I think, in all reality, we would be better off to ask the governor to intervene and suspend her.”
If she’s exonerated, he said, she can be reinstated to her post.
Commissioner Barbara Pierson agreed, saying it would give Bradley the opportunity to address her legal issues while allowing the city to continue to function.
If Scott suspends her, the commission would appoint an interim mayor to fill the vacancy, according to the city’s charter.
She would be removed from office only if she’s convicted of a felony, the charter states.
Bradley, was first elected mayor in 2013 and re-elected in 2015 and in April. She’s registered as a Republican, but elections for the Davenport City Commission are non-partisan. The community in northeast Polk County totals about 2,900 residents.
She was arrested after Polk County sheriff’s deputies reviewed video surveillance of her car parking in a handicapped space at City Hall. The video showed her lifting a large, wheeled briefcase from her trunk before walking into the building.
Deputies discovered the parking placard displayed in Bradley’s car had been issued to a woman who died in 2012, and the expiration date on the placard had been altered to reflect a 2018 expiration date, according to the arrest report.
Further investigation revealed Bradley had additional placards, including one issued to someone who had died in 2015, the arrest affidavit states.
Bradley, 60, is charged with using a deceased person’s identification and possessing an altered or counterfeit decal on a handicapped placard, both of which carry a prison term up to five years if she’s convicted.
She was booked into the Polk County Jail on Tuesday and released after posting $2,250 bail.
In response to Echemendia’s comments regarding the decision to charge Bradley with a felony, Sheriff Grady Judd said Thursday he would expect her lawyer to defend her.
“She needs a good lawyer because she’s committed a felony. She has a handicapped placard with a falsified decal that she used to park directly in front of City Hall,” he said. “She will have her day in court to explain why she’s in possession of three handicapped placards from deceased people.”
He said he couldn’t speak to the politics in Davenport because he’s not familiar with it.
Late Thursday, Echemendia expanded on Bradley’s explanation for her actions in a four-page letter to the citizens of Davenport. He detailed how Bradley was carjacked in 2012 in Orlando and used the spare key in her pocket to narrowly escape her captors. Through Echemendia, Bradley touted her accomplishments as mayor and lauded Judd for his efforts to keep the county safe. The letter also stated Bradley recognized that parking in a handicapped space carries a $250 fine and “assumed that improper parking meant just what it said, and a $250 fine was the ultimate penalty and well worth paying if it saved a life.”
After Thursday’s meeting, Pierson said she was saddened by the incident, and she found it difficult to support seeking Bradley’s suspension.
“The moment we took the vote, it was hard for me because I feel her heart is for the city,” she said. “She has been doing wonderful things for the city, and I’m saddened for her tenure to be tainted by this, but I don’t believe there are political motivations behind it. I just think coming back from something like this is very difficult.”
Deborah Burress, a former Davenport commissioner, also supported Bradley’s suspension, telling commissioners Thursday it was making the city a laughingstock.
“This is very embarassing for Davenport,” she said after the meeting. “If she’s suspended, she won’t be in the limelight, creating more attention for the city.”
Vice Mayor Rob Robinson said he’s disappointed this incident has diminished the good things Bradley has done for Davenport.
“She’s a very dedicated public official,” he said. “We didn’t always agree, but that doesn’t do away with all that she has done for the city.”
He, too, said he doesn’t think the incident was politically motivated.
“I hope not, anyway,” he said. “I’ve made more people mad than her.”

Suzie Schottelkotte can be reached at suzie.schottelkotte@ theledger.com or 863-533-9070. Follow her on Twitter @southpolkscene.


For black women, #MeToo came centuries too late (Colbert King, WaPo)

$
0
0
Share this eloquent slave testimony with those who need their conscience (and consciousness) raised. Florida is damn lucky that Stetson Kennedy led the WPA's efforts here, interviewing slaves in the 1930s, the biggest trove of slave interviews in the Nation. Dr. Peggy Bulger's painstaking Ph.D. thesis is now available in paperback, documenting the work of my late friend and mentor, Wm. Stetson Kennedy.





Slave shackles on display at New Sardis Baptist Church in Memphis. Mike Brown/Asscoaited (sic) Press

By Colbert I. King Opinion writer December 8 at 7:28 PM
The reckoning with men who use their power to take what they want from women, as signified by Time magazine’s choosing the #MeToo movement — “The Silence Breakers” — as the 2017 Person of the Year, has been momentous.

But it comes centuries late for America’s original victims of grotesque sexual exploitation: black women, who suffered horribly, in forced silence, back in the day when it was considered quite all right for white folks to own people of a darker hue.

Memories of that repugnant era can be found in interviews of former slaves compiled in the 1930s by the Works Progress Administration Slaves Narrative Project. That legacy of pain and suffering remains with us today.

“Plenty of the colored women have children by the white men. She know better than to not do what he say. . . . Then they take them very same children what have they own blood and make slaves out of them. If the Missus find out she raise revolution. But she hardly find out. The white men not going to tell and the nigger women were always afraid to. So they jes go on hopin’ that thing[s] won’t be that way always.”

— W.L. Bost, enslaved in North Carolina, interviewed 1937.

“There was a doctor in the neighborhood who bought a girl and installed her on the place for his own use, his wife hearing it severely beat her. . . . I have had many opportunities, a chance to watch white men and women in my long career, colored women have many hard battles to fight to protect themselves from assault by employers, white male servants or by white men, many times not being able to protect [themselves], in fear of losing their positions.”


— Richard Macks, enslaved in Maryland, interviewed 1937.

“In them times white men went with colored gals and women bold[ly]. Any time they saw one and wanted her, she had to go with him, and his wife didn’t say nothin’ ’bout it. . . . Now sometimes, if you was a real pretty young gal, somebody would buy you without knowin’ anythin’ ’bout you, just for yourself. Before my old marster died, he had a pretty gal he was goin’ with and he wouldn’t let her work nowhere but in the house, and his wife nor nobody else didn’t say nothin’ ’bout it; they knowed better. She had three chillun for him and when he died his brother come and got the gal and the chillun.”

— Unnamed former slave, enslaved in Georgia, interviewed circa 1937.

“I was regarded as fair-looking for one of my race, and for four years a white man . . . had base designs upon me. I do not care to dwell upon this subject, for it is one that is fraught with pain. Suffice it to say that he persecuted me for four years, and I — I — became a mother. The child of which he was the father was the only child that I ever brought into the world. If my poor boy ever suffered any humiliating pangs on account of birth, he could not blame his mother, for God knows that she did not wish to give him life. He must blame the edicts of that society which deemed it no crime to undermine the virtue of girls in my then position.”


— Elizabeth Keckley, author of the autobiography “Behind the Scenes: Or, Thirty Years a Slave, and Four Years in the White House,” 1868.

“Mother said there were cases where these young girls loved someone else and would have to receive the attentions of men of the master’s choice . . . . The masters called themselves Christians, went to church worship regularly and yet allowed this condition to exist.”

— Hilliard Yellerday, enslaved in North Carolina, interviewed circa 1937.

Many of the light-skinned blacks of my generation and in generations before are descendants of Southern rural plantations. They and their children are living reminders of a time without safeguards or boundaries, and when black women had no choice — and white men faced no consequences.

This is the period that Roy Moore, the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate from Alabama, is nostalgic for. “I think it was great at the time when families were united — even though we had slavery — they cared for one another,” he said.


How different is it today? My Post colleague Karen Attiah noted this in an interview with NPR about the #MeToo movement:

“What ties all of this together, regardless of income, regardless of status, regardless of color, really, is about the abuse of power.” Women of color already have harder barriers in those professional circles, she said. “I think we absolutely do need to pay more attention to their stories, and part of that will be for us to start listening and to start taking women of color seriously.” And that, Lord knows, will be an American First.

I study liars. I’ve never seen one like President Trump. He tells far more lies, and far more cruel ones, than ordinary people do. (Dr. Bella DePaulo, WaPo)

$
0
0
This ethically-impaired bully and his local dotard toadies and enablers (like Sheriff DAVID SHOAR) need to be ousted from office.


 2:48
President Trump has made more than 1,318 false or misleading statements

  
Bella DePaulo is a social scientist who has published extensively on the psychology of lying. Her most recent book is "Alone: The Badass Psychology of People Who Like Being Alone."
I study liars. I’ve never seen one like President Trump.
He tells far more lies, and far more cruel ones, than ordinary people do.


By Bella DePaulo December 8 at 6:00 AM
The Washington Post
I spent the first two decades of my career as a social scientist studying liars and their lies. I thought I had developed a sense of what to expect from them. Then along came President Trump. His lies are both more frequent and more malicious than ordinary people’s.

In research beginning in the mid-1990s, when I was a professor at the University of Virginia, my colleagues and I asked 77 college students and 70 people from the nearby community to keep diaries of all the lies they told every day for a week. They handed them in to us with no names attached. We calculated participants’ rates of lying and categorized each lie as either self-serving (told to advantage the liar or protect the liar from embarrassment, blame or other undesired outcomes) or kind (told to advantage, flatter or protect someone else).

At The Washington Post, the Fact Checker feature been tracking every false and misleading claim and flip-flop made by President Trump this year. The inclusion of misleading statements and flip-flops is consistent with the definition of lying my colleagues and I gave to our participants: “A lie occurs any time you intentionally try to mislead someone.” In the case of Trump’s claims, though, it is possible to ascertain only whether they were false or misleading, and not what the president’s intentions were. (And while the subjects of my research self-reported how often they lied, Trump’s falsehoods were tallied by The Post.)

I categorized the most recent 400 lies that The Post had documented through mid-November in the same way my colleagues and I had categorized the lies of the participants in our study.

The college students in our research told an average of two lies a day, and the community members told one. more recent of the lies 1,000 U. S. adults told in the previous 24 hours found that people told an average of 1.65 lies per day; the authors noted that 60 percent of the participants said they told no lies at all, while the top 5 percent of liars told nearly half of all the falsehoods in the study.

In Trump’s first 298 days in office, however, he made 1,628 false or misleading claims or flip-flops, by The Post’s tally. That’s about six per day, far higher than the average rate in our studies. And of course, reporters have access to only a subset of Trump’s false statements — the ones he makes publicly — so unless he never stretches the truth in private, his actual rate of lying is almost certainly higher.


That rate has been accelerating. Starting in early October, The Post’s tracking showed that Trump told a remarkable nine lies a day, outpacing even the biggest liars in our research.

But the flood of deceit isn’t the most surprising finding about Trump.

Both the college students and the community members in our study served their own interests with their lies more often than other people’s interests. They told lies to try to advantage themselves in the workplace, the marketplace, their personal relationships and just about every other domain of everyday life. For example, a salesperson told a customer that the jeans she was trying on were not too tight, so she could make the sale. The participants also lied to protect themselves psychologically: One college student told a classmate that he wasn’t worried about his grades, so the classmate wouldn’t think him stupid.

Less often, the participants lied in kind ways, to help other people get what they wanted, look or feel better, or to spare them from embarrassment or blame. For example, a son told his mother he didn’t mind taking her shopping, and a woman took sides with a friend who was divorcing, even though she thought her friend was at fault, too.


About half the lies the participants told were self-serving (46 percent for the college students, 57 percent for the community members), compared with about a quarter that were kind (26 percent for the students, 24 percent for the community members). Other lies did not fit either category; they included, for instance, lies told to entertain or to keep conversations running smoothly.

One category of lies was so small that when we reported the results, we just tucked them into a footnote. Those were cruel lies, told to hurt or disparage others. For example, one person told a co-worker that the boss wanted to see him when he really didn’t, “so he’d look like a fool.” Just 0.8 percent of the lies told by the college students and 2.4 percent of the lies told by the community members were mean-spirited.

My colleagues and I found it easy to code each of our participants’ lies into just one category. This was not the case for Trump. Close to a quarter of his false statements (24 percent) served several purposes simultaneously.

Nearly two-thirds of Trump’s lies (65 percent) were self-serving. Examples included: “They’re  big tax cuts —— the biggest cuts in the history of our country, actually” and, about the people who came to see him on a presidential visit to  Vietnam  last month: “They were really lined up in the streets by the tens of thousands.”


Slightly less than 10 percent of Trump’s lies were kind ones, told to advantage, flatter or protect someone else. An example was his statement on Twitter that “it is a ‘miracle’ how fast the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police were able to find the demented shooter and stop him from even more killing!” In the broadest sense, it is possible to interpret every lie as ultimately self-serving, but I tried to stick to how statements appeared on the surface.

Trump told 6.6 times as many self-serving lies as kind ones. That’s a much higher ratio than we found for our study participants, who told about double the number of self-centered lies compared with kind ones.

The most stunning way Trump’s lies differed from our participants’, though, was in their cruelty. An astonishing 50 percent of Trump’s lies were hurtful or disparaging. For example, he proclaimed that John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey, all career intelligence or law enforcement officials, were  “political hacks.” He said that “the Sloppy Michael Moore Show on Broadway was a TOTAL BOMB and was forced to close.” Talking about green card applicants, he  insisted that other “countries, they don’t put their finest in the lottery system. They put people probably in many cases that they don’t want.” And he claimed that  “Ralph Northam, who is running for Governor of Virginia, is fighting for the violent MS-13 killer gangs & sanctuary cities.”

The Trump lies that could not be coded into just one category were typically told both to belittle others and enhance himself. For example: “Senator Bob Corker ‘begged’ me to endorse him for reelection in Tennessee. I said ‘NO’ and he dropped out (said he could not win without my endorsement).”

The sheer frequency of Trump’s lies appears to be having an effect, and it may not be the one he is going for. A Politico/Morning Consult poll from late October  showed that only 35 percent  of voters believed that Trump was honest, while 51 percent said he was not honest. (The others said they didn’t know or had no opinion.) Results of a Quinnipiac University poll from November were similar: Thirty-seven percent of voters thought Trump was honest, compared with 58 percent who thought he was not. 
For fewer than 40 percent of American voters to see the president as honest is truly remarkable. Most humans, most of the time, believe other people. That’s our default setting. Usually, we need a reason to disbelieve.

Research on the detection of deception consistently documents this “truth bias.” In the typical study, participants observe people making statements and are asked to indicate, each time, whether they think the person is lying or telling the truth. Measuring whether people believe others should be difficult to do accurately, because simply asking the question disrupts the tendency to assume that other people are telling the truth. It gives participants a reason to wonder. And yet, in our statistical summary of more than 200 studies, Charles F. Bond Jr. and I found that participants still believed other people more often than they should have — 58 percent of the time in studies in which only half of the statements were truthful. People are biased toward believing others, even in studies in which they are told explicitly that only half of the statements they will be judging are truths.

By telling so many lies, and so many that are mean-spirited, Trump is violating some of the most fundamental norms of human social interaction and human decency. Many of the rest of us, in turn, have abandoned a norm of our own — we no longer give Trump the benefit of the doubt that we usually give so readily.

DUNE DEFENDERS DEFEAT DEFIANT, DODGY DR. JAMES GRIMES -- ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH CITY COMMISSION WON'T JOIN APPLICATION FOR RETROACTIVE PERMIT FOR DESTRUCTION OF WHAT CONSULTANT CALLED "MONSTROUS OBNOXIOUS DUNE"

$
0
0
In September, Dr. JAMES GRIMES, M.D. et ux destroyed a dune after Hurricane Irma, a possible environmental crime investigated by the police and environmental regulators.  On December 6, DR. GRIMES asked City of St. Augustine Beach Commissioners to join in his demand for a retroactive permit.

The City Commissioners said NO WAY.

On December 6, 2017, he was turned down by St. Augustine Beach City Commissioners, led by Mayor-elect UNDINE PAWLOWSKI GEORGE, who said "I have zero appetite" for supporting an after-the-fact permit for a "free walkway," while reducing the dune height by another four feet, with "no science," just a one page document, no agreement by neighbors (or "buy-in") for an alley walkover only 150 feet from the next walkover, and no consultation with the County Engineer. "We don't need to stab them in the back," she said.

Mayor-elect GEORGE and Vice Mayor-elect MARGARET ENGLAND noted there were "no plans." Commissioners Margaret England, Maggie Kostka and Donald Samora agreed there was "no application" and "nothing to vote on."

"Sir, our number one priority is beach renourishment," Mayor-elect GEORGE said.  Nothing should be done that would risk U.S. Army Corps of Engineers support for renourishment for GRIMES' view.

Bruce Wright said, "leave the dunes alone," noting that "you're not even supposed to walk on them," while condemning GRIMES'"backhoe activity."

Ann Palmquist took offense at PARTEL's condemning "nature's creation" as "monstrous" and to GRIMES having "no remorse."

GRIMES then spoke to his alleged environmental crimes -- the 2 Twelfth Lane controversy -- demurely claiming there was "a lack of clarity about aha happened," saying "I wasn't there." Leon's Tractor Service, "good-ole-boys" did the work, but GRIMES was not present.   GRIMES claims "there was no intent." GRIMES claimed the SABPD and FDEP said, "Hmm.  Okay."

That bizarre claim is flatly contradicted by SABPD and FDEP paperwork. What a liar.

GRIMES never returned my telephone calls after the SABPD and FDEP investigated.  Coward?

Watch video here starting at 57:00 to  1:51:45.



I wanted to sing the Star Spangled Banner.

Thanks to St. Augustine Beach City Commissioners for their decisiveness, roundly rejecting the invitation of dastardly dune-destroying Dr. JAMES GRIMES, rejecting his demand to join with him in his application for a retroactive permit. GRIMES' crimes against nature have "zero" support here.

Flagler Hospital Chief of Medicine Dr. JAMES GRIMES, M.D. was unsworn, unapologetic, uncaring and unhanded.  So was GRIMES' consultant.

DR. GRIMES' oleaginous Coastal Consultants mouthpiece, former FDEP employee, KEVIN PARTEL, bragged of FDEP agreeing to the permit verbally (without evidence), as he actually attacked the dune as a "monstrous obnoxious dune," saying "there was no beach there" until 1988.  PARTEL said he and GRIMES wanted to provide the City with an unneeded "walkover" on a small lane where none is needed "out of the kindness of our hearts." I coughed (or laughed).

Only dune-destroying Mayor RICHARD BURTT O'BRIEN wanted to help Dr. GRIMES, but PARTEL admitted that O'BRIEN is a client of PARTEL.  I told O'BRIEN he would have to recuse himself  F.S. 112.313.

KEVIN PARTEL (rhymes with "cartel') publicly bragged to O'BRIEN that he'd been working "at your house for years."

PARTEL previously spoke to City Commissioners in 2015, called in by then-Mayor ANDREA SAMUELS (R-Key International), to speak about storm-proofing and the too-tall Embassy Suites Hotel.  Rather than call FDEP for a speaker, SAMUELS called PARTEL.  Why?

Note to DR. GRIMES:  The "monstrous obnoxious dune" was created by nature.  It shelters wildlife, it is legally protected and it protects homes and businesses from flooding in hurricanes and Nor'easters.

DR. GRIMES' alleged environmental crime, like Mayor O'BRIEN's alleged environmental crime, was "monstrous and obnoxious."

DR. GRIMES and KEVIN PARTEL, his pompous consultant deserve to be rejected by FDEP.  FDEP needs to investigate PARTEL's bragging about he "pushes through permits" at FDEP and USACE, claiming he spoke in Tallahassee with Tony McNeal of FDEP, overstating his case by implying inside influence and implying his expected approval -- yet wheedling for more than an hour in an attempt to make the City a "co-applicant."

You can reach Coastal Construction Control Line Program Administrator Tony McNeal, P.E. at 850-245-7665, Florida P.E. license no. xxx, state employee since11/05/1984, annual salary $75,976.56

I compared DR. GRIMES to the kid who kills his parents and throws himself on the mercy of the court as an orphan -- this shameless sawbones radiates chutzpa.  GRIMES said he was not present when the backhoe did its damage.

GRIMES' wife was apparently there when the damage, based on FDEP and news reports).   GRIMES was having a knee replacement (out of town -- wonder why?  What does he know.)

PZB Chair Jane West, an environmental attorney, was nowhere to be seen, having attended City Commission meetings two nights in a row on a bag ban, but taking a walk on the dune destruction.

Sad.

Read my prior coverage on GRIMES' environmental crimes on this blog:

September 29, 2017 (PHYSICIAN, HEAL THIS DUNE:  Bulldozer Damaged Dune, Homeowner Gets FDEP Ultimatum -- Flagler Hospital Medical Staff President, JAMES MICHAEL GRIMES, M.D.)
http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/10/doctor-grimes-alleged-criminal-dune.html











Two Florida Republicans Hatch Plans to Legalize Illegal Online Sports Gambling (SB 374 & HB 223)

$
0
0
Two leaders of Florida Republican legislators seek to legalize multibillion dollar illegal gambling schemes by DraftKings  and Fan Duel.  Watch these two other-directed as they attempt to justify immoral corporate oligarchs and their unethical marketing, addicting young people to online gambling.

While the Attorney General of New York State has shut them down, Flori-DUH legislators want to legalize them., despite investigative reporting by The New York Times and PBS Frontline.


State Senator Dana Young (R-Tampa)


State Rep. JASON BRODEUR (R-Sanford)


Two Florida Republican legislators seek to legalize multibillion dollar illegal gambling schemes by DraftKings  and Fan Duel.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman halted two multi-billion dollar online gambling schemes for lawbreaking, banning DraftKings and FanDuel from taking daily fantasy sports bets from New York residents. The order was the result of  The New York Times investigation headed by Assistant Editor for Investigative Reporting Walt Bogdanich. 

Here's NSOF's article:

Bill would clarify fantasy sports not subject to Florida gambling laws
News Service of Florida News Service of Florida
4:58 p.m Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017

TALLAHASSEE
Despite concerns raised by the Seminole Tribe of Florida, a Senate committee Thursday approved a bill that would make clear fantasy sports contests are not a type of illegal gambling.

Lawmakers in recent years have repeatedly considered such bills after questions were raised in Florida and other states about the legality of online fantasy-sports games.

In fantasy sports, participants typically select teams of actual athletes, with the teams winning or losing based on the athletes’ statistical performances. The Senate Regulated Industries Committee on Thursday voted 8-1 to back a measure (SB 374), filed by Sen. Dana Young, R-Tampa, that would seek to establish that the games are legal and are not subject to state gambling regulation.

“We’ve got 3 million Floridians that love playing these games, and they are looking to us to let them know that they are not engaging in some sort of criminal activity,” Young said.

The Seminole Tribe, however, sent a letter Tuesday to the Legislature expressing concerns about whether the proposal could violate a gambling agreement between the tribe and the state.

The agreement involves the tribe making payments to the state and receiving what is known as “exclusivity” in being able to offer certain types of games at its casinos.

In the letter, the tribe said it thinks the proposed fantasy-sports legislation would violate the exclusivity in the gambling agreement.

Young, however, disputed the tribe’s contentions before the Regulated Industries Committee approved the bill. Rep. Jason Brodeur, R-Sanford, has filed a similar bill (HB 223), though it has not been heard in House committees.

The bills are filed for the 2018 legislative session, which starts Jan. 9.
Viewing all 6438 articles
Browse latest View live