Another cogent column by conservative columnist George F. Will, a winner of the Pulitzer Prize for commentary. He sees right through DONALD JOHN TRUMP, as do a majority of the American people.
In The Final Days of RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, our corrupt Republican President talked to paintings of dead Presidents.
We know to whom DONALD JOHN TRUMP talks: VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH PUTIN, President of Russia, ex-KGB agent and billionaire from corruption, possibly the world's richest man.
Then Presidential candidate DONALD TRUMP spoke here in St. Augustine at our Amphitheater on October 23, 2016. St. Augustine Police shut down our historic Bridge of Lions so TRUMP could drive across both lanes, as if he were Benito Mussolini or Adolf Hitler. Those dupes who attended his rally now regret it. One day, few of our friends and neighbors who were so deceived by this evil man will want to admit they voted for him.
From The Washington Post:
In The Final Days of RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, our corrupt Republican President talked to paintings of dead Presidents.
We know to whom DONALD JOHN TRUMP talks: VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH PUTIN, President of Russia, ex-KGB agent and billionaire from corruption, possibly the world's richest man.
Then Presidential candidate DONALD TRUMP spoke here in St. Augustine at our Amphitheater on October 23, 2016. St. Augustine Police shut down our historic Bridge of Lions so TRUMP could drive across both lanes, as if he were Benito Mussolini or Adolf Hitler. Those dupes who attended his rally now regret it. One day, few of our friends and neighbors who were so deceived by this evil man will want to admit they voted for him.
From The Washington Post:
The spiraling president adds self-impeachment to his repertoire
Oct. 10, 2019 at 1:22 p.m. EDT
Because frivolousness and stupidity are neither high crimes nor misdemeanors, his decision, however contemptible because it betrays America’s Kurdish friends, is not an impeachable offense. It should, however, color the impeachment debate because it coincides with his extraordinary and impeachment-pertinent challenge to Congress’s constitutional duty to conduct oversight of the executive branch.
Aside from some rhetorical bleats, Republicans are acquiescing as Trump makes foreign policy by and for his viscera. This might, and should, complete what the Iraq War began in 2003 — the destruction of the GOP’s advantage regarding foreign policy.
Democrats were present at the creation of Cold War strategy. From President Harry S. Truman and Secretary of State Dean Acheson through Sen. Henry Jackson and advisers such as Max Kampelman and Jeane Kirkpatrick, they built the diplomatic architecture (e.g., NATO) and helped to maintain the military muscle that won the war. But the party fractured over Vietnam, veering into dyspeptic interpretations of America’s history at home and abroad, and a portion of the party pioneered a revised isolationism. Conservative isolationism had said America was too virtuous for involvement in the fallen world. Progressive isolationism said America was too fallen to improve the less-fallen world.
Hence Republicans acquired a durable advantage concerning the core presidential responsibility, national security. Durable but not indestructible, if Democrats will take the nation’s security as seriously as Trump injures it casually.
Trump’s gross and comprehensive incompetence now increasingly impinges upon the core presidential responsibility. This should, but will not, cause congressional Republicans to value their own and their institution’s dignity and exercise its powers more vigorously than they profess fealty to Trump. He has issued a categorical refusal to supply witnesses and documents pertinent to the House investigation of whether he committed an impeachable offense regarding Ukraine. This refusal, which is analogous to an invocation of the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, justifies an inference of guilt. Worse, this refusal attacks our constitutional regime. So, the refusal is itself an impeachable offense.
As comparable behavior was in 1974. Then, the House articles of impeachment against President Richard M. Nixon indicted him for failing “without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by” a House committee, and for having “interposed the powers of the presidency against the lawful subpoenas” of the House.
If Trump gets away with his blanket noncompliance, the Constitution’s impeachment provision, as it concerns presidents, will be effectively repealed, and future presidential corruption will be largely immunized against punishment.
In Federalist 51, James Madison anticipated a wholesome rivalry and constructive tension between the government’s two political branches: “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected to the constitutional rights of the place.” Equilibrium between the branches depends on “supplying, by opposite and rival interests, the defect of better motives.” But equilibrium has vanished as members of Congress think entirely as party operatives and not at all as institutionalists.
Trump is not just aggressively but lawlessly exercising the interests of his place, counting on Congress, after decades of lassitude regarding its interests, being an ineffective combatant. Trump’s argument, injected into him by subordinates who understand that absurdity is his vocation, is essentially that the Constitution’s impeachment provisions are unconstitutional.
The canine loyalty of Senate Republicans will keep Trump in office. But until he complies with House committee subpoenas, the House must not limply hope federal judges will enforce their oversight powers. Instead, the House should wield its fundamental power, that of the purse, to impose excruciating costs on executive branch noncompliance. This can be done.
In 13 months, all congressional Republicans who have not defended Congress by exercising “the constitutional rights of the place” should be defeated. If congressional Republicans continue their genuflections at Trump’s altar, the appropriate 2020 outcome will be a Republican thrashing so severe — losing the House, the Senate and the electoral votes of, say, Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina and even Texas — that even this party of slow-learning careerists might notice the hazards of tethering their careers to a downward-spiraling scofflaw.